How Wagyu Is Changing the Monero Narrative: One Tool Lifting Years of Price Suppression

比推Publicado a 2026-01-14Actualizado a 2026-01-14

Resumen

Wagyu, a new exchange tool, is breaking years of price suppression on Monero (XMR) by addressing a critical flaw in its acquisition process. Since 2018, despite strong demand, XMR's price remained stagnant, primarily because major exchanges delisted it, forcing over 60% of users to rely on instant swap services. These offshore services charged exorbitant fees (effectively 3-4%) and often froze funds under "AML checks," creating constant sell pressure as they immediately converted XMR profits to stablecoins. This parasitic cycle drained an estimated $30,000-$100,000 daily from the market. Wagyu v2 routes orders to Hyperliquid, providing exchange-level pricing and near-zero fees, eliminating the need for exploitative swap services. By removing this sell pressure and allowing true price discovery, Wagyu has already processed millions in trades, contributing to XMR's recent breakout above $600. The tool is effectively saving Monero by connecting genuine demand directly to real market liquidity.

Written by: PerpetualCow.hl

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Original Title: How Wagyu Is Saving Monero: How One Tool Is Breaking Years of Price Suppression?


A few days ago, I exposed the trillion-dollar instant exchange industry. Today, I'm connecting the dots that haven't been pieced together yet on Crypto Twitter.

Since 2018, while almost every other cryptocurrency has been surging, the price of Monero (XMR) has been stuck in a range.

Most attribute this to exchange delistings, regulatory pressure, or the narrative that 'privacy coins are dead.'

They are all wrong.

To understand what's happening, you must first delve deep into the history of Monero XMR, including all the exchange delistings, and how most people actually buy this coin.

The Real Demand for Monero XMR

People have always wanted Monero, not just for privacy, but because it's seen as a store of value alternative to Bitcoin, like a 21st-century Swiss bank account.

Its utility didn't change just because exchanges got scared of regulation and delisted it.

This can be compared to illegal drug trade: when it's impossible to buy from a legitimate pharmacy, addicts will seek out more dubious channels, paying a higher price to get what they need.

As a result, the demand for Monero flowed to instant exchange services, not centralized exchanges.

Think from the perspective of an average user in 2024:

You want to buy Monero, but Binance just delisted it, and Coinbase won't touch it. Other small exchanges that still trade Monero are likely to freeze your funds for dealing with this coin.

You only have two choices:

Find a third-rate exchange that still lists Monero and pray they don't run off with the money.

Use an instant exchange service, pay high fees, and pray they don't freeze your funds indefinitely under the pretext of 'AML review'.

Over 60% of users chose the second path.

These services became the de facto on/off ramps for the Monero ecosystem.

They are, of course, unregulated and offer terrible exchange rates, but users have no other choice.

After all legitimate exchanges abandoned Monero, the instant exchange industry became the only channel, absorbing all Monero trading volume.

Tracking the Flow of Funds

All instant exchange services operate the same way:

The user sends Bitcoin and receives Monero, with the service secretly charging a 3-4% fee (while ostensibly only charging 0.5-1%).

But these fees are priced in Monero.

So how do these service providers handle the Monero they receive?

They don't hold it long-term; they are not believers. These are offshore companies chasing fiat profits, who immediately convert Monero to stablecoins and cash out.

Just like that, millions of dollars worth of Monero are sold into the market every day.

In market microstructure terms, this creates a persistent one-way outflow of funds. Regardless of overall market conditions, these services are constantly selling. While this is just their business model, the impact on price is devastating.

Quantifying the Capital Drain

In my previous article, I estimated the instant exchange industry handles about $1.5 trillion in transactions annually (across all chains), and that's just the on-chain verifiable part.

Monero's volume is invisible due to its privacy features, but industry estimates suggest it accounts for about 20% of total instant exchange flow.

Assume $30 billion worth of Monero is exchanged through these services annually.

Conservatively, the actual figure might be half of that, around $15 billion.

At an average fee of 0.75% (most actually charge 1%), the Monero fees collected annually are worth about $112.5 million.

All of this Monero is sold into the market.

This means over $300,000 in passive selling pressure every day. It's like an invisible pump constantly draining value from Monero.

And this is a conservative estimate. If Monero truly accounts for 20% of the volume and fees are 1%, that's $300 million annually, approaching $1 million in daily selling pressure.

But it doesn't end there; there's also the 'AML Trap'.

The AML Trap

This is the 'dirty secret' I exposed in my last article: these services, while advertising 'No KYC', arbitrarily freeze user funds under the pretext of 'AML review'.

It's estimated that 2-5% of transactions through instant exchange services get frozen. The rate is higher for large transactions.

This creates a vicious cycle:

Small transactions go through but are charged fees 10-20 times higher than normal

Large transactions are completely frozen, often permanently

Only a fraction of the actual buying demand actually reaches the market

This creates the most brutal price discovery barrier: buyers who could actually influence the price are systematically excluded from the market.

The real demand for Monero has always been far higher than its price reflects. The instant exchange industry either extracts from this demand or outright chokes it off.

A Captive Market

Let me be clear about this vicious cycle:

The instant exchange industry did not win the market through competitiveness. They gained a monopoly position when all exchanges delisted Monero, and then proceeded to extract the maximum possible from users who had nowhere else to go.

1% fees plus terrible exchange rates, plus random fund freezes.

Users tolerate it because they have no choice, and these service providers know it.

This is what happens when an entire asset class is forced into a single channel controlled by anonymous offshore operators: they extract with an uncompetitive product.

Every cent they extract turns into selling pressure on Monero.

Wagyu's Solution

Two days ago, Wagyu v2 launched.

The core idea is simple: let Monero users enjoy the same pricing level as exchange traders.

When you exchange through Wagyu, your order is routed to @Hyperliquidx—where the most competitive market makers in crypto compete for orders.

These are the same market makers that provide liquidity for Binance, Bybit, and OKX, offering tiny spreads.

The result: you get exchange-level prices and fees. No more 1% or 0.5%, but ultra-low rates like professional traders.

For the first time since Monero was delisted from exchanges, users don't have to get 'ripped off' just for using their own assets.

A single $100,000 transaction prevents over $1,000 in selling pressure from hitting the market.

Within 48 hours of launch, Wagyu v2 has already processed millions in exchanges, offering the best market prices:

Trades that would have gone through traditional services, been charged over 1% in fees, and caused the market to instantly absorb tens of thousands in selling pressure, are now happening through Wagyu.

$1 million exchange through traditional services = $10,000 worth of Monero sold

The same $1 million exchange through Wagyu = Zero forced selling

Multiply this effect by every large Monero buyer who discovers they no longer have to be 'robbed'.

Reversing the Vicious Cycle

For years, Monero has been trapped in a negative feedback loop:

The instant exchange industry acted as a value extraction layer, sitting between buyers and the real price. They intercepted demand, extracted profits, and distorted price signals. Users couldn't bypass them because there was no alternative.

Now, that has changed.

Just two days after launch, volume is already migrating to Wagyu. People are realizing they can get Binance-level pricing for an asset Binance won't even list, and the word is spreading fast.

The cycle is reversing:

It's no coincidence that Monero broke through $600 and began its first price discovery in years.

Wagyu Is Saving Monero

I'm not going to be modest about this:

Every exchange made through Wagyu instead of a traditional service is real buying pressure that reaches the market.

Every million-dollar trade that flows through us means over $10,000 won't be sold onto other holders.

We are not extracting from the Monero ecosystem; we are plugging it directly into real liquidity.

The parasitic layer that has suppressed Monero for years has finally met its competitor. And we are not competing on their terms—we are making their entire model obsolete.

When users can get exchange-level pricing with zero freeze risk through Wagyu, who will pay 1% fees to anonymous offshore services that might freeze their funds?

No one will.

What This Means

I'm not here to give price predictions. I don't know if Monero will go to $1,000, $2,000, or fall back to $400.

But I know for sure: for the first time since being delisted from exchanges, demand for Monero can truly translate into price.

We've been live for only two days and are already processing millions in trades—trades that would have continuously 'bled' the market.

With the 'ceiling' removed, Monero at $600 is still undervalued. At least now, the market will truly decide its value.

Price discovery is finally possible, and Wagyu is making it happen.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7602589

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason the author argues that Monero's price was suppressed for years?

AThe author argues that Monero's price was suppressed due to the parasitic extraction by instant exchange services, which acted as the primary on/off-ramp after centralized exchanges delisted XMR. These services charged high fees (effectively 3-4%) and immediately sold the XMR fees for stablecoins, creating constant sell pressure of an estimated $30,000 to $100,000 daily.

QHow did the instant exchange industry impact Monero's price discovery according to the article?

AThe instant exchange industry severely distorted Monero's price discovery by intercepting demand, charging exorbitant fees, and systematically freezing large transactions. This created a one-way outflow of value, preventing genuine buy-side demand from reaching the market and influencing the price.

QWhat solution does Wagyu v2 provide to the problem described in the article?

AWagyu v2 routes user orders to the Hyperliquid exchange, where professional market makers provide highly competitive, exchange-level pricing and minimal fees. This allows users to trade XMR without the excessive fees and freezing risks of traditional instant exchanges, eliminating the forced selling pressure those services created.

QWhat was the estimated annual volume of Monero processed by instant exchanges, and what was the resulting sell pressure?

AThe article estimates that instant exchanges processed approximately $150 billion to $300 billion in annual Monero volume. With an average fee of 0.75% to 1%, this resulted in $112.5 million to $300 million worth of XMR being sold annually, creating a daily sell pressure of over $300,000 to nearly $1 million.

QHow does the author describe the change in the market cycle for Monero after the introduction of Wagyu?

AThe author states that the negative feedback loop, where instant exchanges extracted value and suppressed the price, is now reversing. With Wagyu providing a efficient, non-extractive on-ramp, genuine buy-side demand can finally reach the market, allowing for true price discovery for the first time since XMR was delisted from major exchanges.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ONE

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Harmony (ONE) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Harmony (ONE) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Harmony (ONE)Después de comprar tu Harmony (ONE), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Harmony (ONE)Tradear fácilmente con Harmony (ONE) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

365 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.12Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar ONE

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ONE (ONE).

活动图片