How Far is the Current U.S. Stock Bull Market from Historical Bubble Peaks?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-09Actualizado a 2026-06-09

Resumen

Title: How Far Is the Current U.S. Stock Bull Market from Historical Bubble Peaks? Summary: According to Goldman Sachs' chief U.S. equity strategist, current market exuberance ranks at the 86th historical percentile. While approaching, this level remains notably below the extremes seen at the peaks of the 2000 dot-com bubble (100th percentile) and the 2021 bull market (95th percentile). The recent 15% surge in the S&P 500 over two months represents one of the strongest volatility-adjusted rallies in over 50 years, primarily fueled by AI-related enthusiasm and backed by significant upward revisions to earnings estimates, providing a more fundamental basis than past momentum-driven peaks. Key risk signals—speculative frenzy, deteriorating growth, heavy equity issuance, and Federal Reserve tightening—are all closer to their historical triggers than a few months ago but are not yet fully activated. For instance, IPO activity is recovering, and market breadth remains narrow, though not at dot-com bubble extremes. The strategist cautions that while the current cycle may not replicate past peaks exactly and a downturn does not require extreme euphoria, risks are accumulating. The overall assessment is that the bull market still has room to run, but the window of opportunity is gradually narrowing.

Original Author: Zhao Ying

Original Source: Wall Street News

The latest assessment from Goldman Sachs' chief U.S. stock strategist shows that the current market euphoria has climbed to the 86th historical percentile, approaching but not yet reaching the extreme levels seen at the peaks of the 2000 dot-com bubble and the 2021 bull market.

Over the past two months, the S&P 500 index surged 15% before Friday's pullback, a gain ranking in the 99th percentile of historical data since 1980. In his latest report, Goldman Sachs' chief U.S. stock strategist Ben Snider pointed out that, although the four historical signals of a bull market peak — speculative frenzy, deteriorating growth, massive equity issuance, and Fed tightening — are not fully in place yet, each is closer to its trigger threshold than it was a few months ago.

For the market, this judgment means there is still room for the current bull market, but risks are accumulating. Snider explicitly stated "we're not there yet," while also warning that markets don't need investors to be extremely euphoric to decline, and historical patterns may not repeat themselves in this cycle.

The Strength of the Rally: The Strongest Volatility-Adjusted Rebound in 50 Years

The speed of this rebound has already left its mark in history. According to Goldman Sachs data, the S&P 500's roughly 15% gain over about two months, relative to realized volatility, yields a return/volatility ratio near 4, the highest level in over 50 years.

Artificial intelligence is the core theme driving this market phase. AI concept stocks, the momentum factor, and major indices are rising in sync, forming a high level of resonance.

Snider notes that unlike similar momentum-driven rallies in the past (such as late 1999 and late 2021), the main support for this round of gains comes from substantial recent upward revisions to earnings expectations, rather than a pure sentiment bubble. This provides a somewhat more solid fundamental backing for the current upswing.

Euphoria Indicator: 86th Percentile, Below Two Historical Peaks

To quantify current market sentiment, Snider constructed a comprehensive evaluation framework covering four categories and nine indicators. Historical data shows that at the peak of the 2000 dot-com bubble, the median ranking of these indicators reached the 100th historical percentile; at the 2021 bull market high, it was the 95th percentile. The current reading is the 86th percentile — above the historical average, but still significantly short of the previous two extreme peaks.

Specifically, Goldman Sachs' speculative trading indicator has risen in recent months but remains below levels at the end of 2025 and far below the peaks of 2000 and 2021. Among various speculative trading activities, the trading volume of high-valuation stocks has increased significantly recently, while the trading activity of unprofitable stocks is relatively mild. In addition, both equity call option volume and retail margin balances are trending upward, indicating investor sentiment is heating up.

Notably, the market breadth of this rally is extremely narrow, but it has not yet reached the extreme concentration seen during the dot-com bubble.

Four Risk Signals: Not Triggered Yet, but Distance is Shortening

Goldman Sachs' analytical framework attributes the end of historically high-valuation, high-concentration bull markets to four types of factors: speculative frenzy, deteriorating growth prospects, extremely bloated equity issuance, and Federal Reserve policy tightening. Snider points out that none of these four conditions fully matches the current environment, but each is closer to its warning line than at the beginning of the year.

IPO activity is reviving, with pressure beginning to show on the equity issuance side; rising input costs are compressing corporate profit margins, posing a potential threat to growth prospects; interest rate market pricing has started to reflect an increased probability of Fed rate hikes, although Goldman Sachs economists believe actual hikes are unlikely.

Snider also emphasizes that market declines do not require investors to be extremely euphoric as a precondition, and the euphoric characteristics seen at past bull market peaks may not reappear in identical form in this cycle. This means that even though current indicators have not yet reached historical extremes, investors should not view this as a sufficient guarantee of a safety margin.

Overall, Goldman Sachs' assessment offers a cautious but not pessimistic judgment: the euphoria level of this bull market is "getting closer and closer" to the historical peak range, but has not arrived yet. The key support for this judgment is that the current gains still have improving earnings expectations as fundamental backing, rather than being purely sentiment-driven. However, with the momentum factor remaining strong, market concentration high, and some risk signals quietly intensifying, Snider's report essentially serves as a reminder to investors: the window is still open, but it is slowly narrowing.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the Goldman Sachs report, how does the current market euphoria level compare to historical bubble peaks like 2000 and 2021?

AThe current market euphoria level is at the 86th percentile historically. This is above the historical average but still significantly below the peaks of the 2000 dot-com bubble (100th percentile) and the 2021 bull market (95th percentile).

QWhat is unique about the recent rally in the S&P 500 compared to historical momentum-driven rallies?

AUnlike previous momentum-driven rallies (e.g., late 1999 and 2021), the recent surge is primarily supported by significant upward revisions to near-term earnings expectations, providing a more solid fundamental foundation rather than being driven purely by sentiment.

QWhat are the four classic risk signals that historically signaled the end of high-valuation, concentrated bull markets, according to Goldman Sachs?

AThe four classic risk signals are: 1) Speculative fervor, 2) Deteriorating growth prospects, 3) Extremely high levels of equity issuance, and 4) Federal Reserve policy tightening.

QWhat is the status of these four risk signals in the current market environment?

ANone of the four risk signals are fully met in the current environment. However, Goldman Sachs notes that each one is closer to its triggering threshold than it was several months ago.

QWhat is Goldman Sachs' overall assessment of the current bull market's stage?

AGoldman Sachs' assessment is cautiously optimistic. They believe the bull market still has room to run as it is not yet at an extreme peak, but they warn that risks are accumulating, the window of opportunity is still open but is gradually narrowing.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: Losses Mount Due to Vulnerable Seed Generation A critical vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets has led to a continued wave of fund thefts. According to Galaxy Research, the total stolen has reached 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $88.6 million) from 4,585 addresses, a significant increase from the initial 594.5 BTC reported on July 30, 2026. Most of the stolen funds remain on the attackers' addresses. The issue is not with the current firmware, which Coinkite has updated, but with seed phrases generated on vulnerable devices between March 2021 and the release of fixed firmware versions. Due to a programmer error, devices switched from using a hardware random number generator to the software-based Yasmarang generator, which was initialized with publicly accessible data like the chip's serial number. This made the seed phrases predictable through offline brute-force attacks, meaning wallets remain at risk until funds are moved to a new wallet generated with the patched firmware. Affected devices include Mk2/Mk3 with firmware 4.0.1–4.1.9 (and up to 5.0.3), Mk4/Mk5 up to version 5.6.0, and Q models up to 1.5.0Q. The only exceptions are seeds created with a high-entropy method like at least 50 independent dice rolls or a strong unique BIP-39 passphrase. All other owners must generate a new seed on the fixed firmware and transfer their assets. A case highlighting the human impact involves a 39-year-old long-term investor who lost 2 BTC (approx. $130,000) in minutes. He had accumulated the Bitcoin over eight years through physical labor, viewing it as a financial lifeline and a retirement plan in a country suffering from hyperinflation. His story underscores that even conservative "buy and hold in cold storage" strategies can be compromised by such underlying technical flaws. From a technical perspective, this incident echoes historical failures where weak random number generators undermined cryptographic security, challenging the assumption that offline storage is automatically foolproof.

cryptonews.ruHace 4 hora(s)

Bitcoin Withdrawals Continue: 8 Years of Storage in a Coldcard Cold Wallet Ended in Zero

cryptonews.ruHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片