Hoskinson Confirms Midnight Mainnet Launch in March

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-12Actualizado a 2026-02-12

Resumen

Charles Hoskinson, founder of Input Output Global (IOG), announced that the Midnight privacy-focused blockchain will officially launch in the last week of March. The announcement was made during his keynote at Consensus Hong Kong. Midnight uses zero-knowledge proofs to enable selective data disclosure, allowing users to share specific information while keeping the rest private. It will function as a partner chain to Cardano, balancing privacy and regulatory compliance. Hoskinson also revealed the Midnight City Simulation, an interactive platform demonstrating how the network handles transaction privacy and scalability. The test involves AI-driven agents simulating real-world demand, proving the network’s readiness for mainstream use. Key partners include Google and Telegram.

Charles Hoskinson, the founder of a leading blockchain and research company, Input Output Global, publicised on February 12 that Midnight, the highly anticipated privacy-focused blockchain of the company, will officially roll out in the last week of March.

The announcement came amid the keynote speech of Hoskinson at Consensus Hong Kong, indicating a significant step forward in IOG’s efforts to take data protection and regulatory compliance to decentralised systems.

In the announcement, he stated that, “We have some significant partnerships to help us run it, and Google is one of them, and Telegram is another. We are highly excited there is more that will come.”

The Midnight City Simulation

Midnight leverages zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs to permit selective disclosure. Think of it as a smart curtain for blockchain data, permitting users to share only what they select while keeping the remainder private.

It acts as a partner chain to the smart contract platform Cardano and offers privacy and regulatory compliance for decentralised applications. Along with the mainnet timeline, Hoskinson revealed Midnight City Simulation, an interactive platform providing a glimpse of how Midnight offers scalable privacy via selective disclosure.

Rational privacy makes sure that transaction data is still private by default, while particular information can be shared with authorised parties when needed. This flexibility helps in balancing transparency and confidentiality on the blockchain via different disclosure views, specified as public, auditor, and god, each having a different access level.

The simulation, organised at Midnight City, became functional at 10:00 a.m. Hong Kong time Thursday; however, public access to the simulation stays prohibited until Feb 26, as per the press release.

The simulation, operating on the Midnight network and enrolling AI-driven agents that collaborate to make a steady flow of transactions, indicates how finely the blockchain can perform real-world demand and scales according to it.

IOG mentioned that this test shows the capability of the network to keep generating and processing proofs at scale, a significant step in proving it is ready for real-world use.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Human API Launches Platform Enabling Direct AI-to-Human Task Coordination

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhen is the Midnight mainnet scheduled to launch, according to Charles Hoskinson?

AThe Midnight mainnet is scheduled to officially roll out in the last week of March.

QWhat two major partnerships did Hoskinson announce to help run the Midnight blockchain?

AThe two major partnerships announced are Google and Telegram.

QWhat key technology does Midnight use to enable selective data disclosure?

AMidnight leverages zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs to permit selective disclosure.

QWhat is the name of the interactive platform that provides a glimpse into how Midnight offers scalable privacy?

AThe interactive platform is called the Midnight City Simulation.

QOn what date does the Midnight City Simulation become publicly accessible?

APublic access to the simulation will be available on February 26.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHace 32 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHace 36 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHace 36 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Trading

Spot