Hoskinson Confirms Midnight Mainnet Launch in March

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-12Actualizado a 2026-02-12

Resumen

Charles Hoskinson, founder of Input Output Global (IOG), announced that the Midnight privacy-focused blockchain will officially launch in the last week of March. The announcement was made during his keynote at Consensus Hong Kong. Midnight uses zero-knowledge proofs to enable selective data disclosure, allowing users to share specific information while keeping the rest private. It will function as a partner chain to Cardano, balancing privacy and regulatory compliance. Hoskinson also revealed the Midnight City Simulation, an interactive platform demonstrating how the network handles transaction privacy and scalability. The test involves AI-driven agents simulating real-world demand, proving the network’s readiness for mainstream use. Key partners include Google and Telegram.

Charles Hoskinson, the founder of a leading blockchain and research company, Input Output Global, publicised on February 12 that Midnight, the highly anticipated privacy-focused blockchain of the company, will officially roll out in the last week of March.

The announcement came amid the keynote speech of Hoskinson at Consensus Hong Kong, indicating a significant step forward in IOG’s efforts to take data protection and regulatory compliance to decentralised systems.

In the announcement, he stated that, “We have some significant partnerships to help us run it, and Google is one of them, and Telegram is another. We are highly excited there is more that will come.”

The Midnight City Simulation

Midnight leverages zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs to permit selective disclosure. Think of it as a smart curtain for blockchain data, permitting users to share only what they select while keeping the remainder private.

It acts as a partner chain to the smart contract platform Cardano and offers privacy and regulatory compliance for decentralised applications. Along with the mainnet timeline, Hoskinson revealed Midnight City Simulation, an interactive platform providing a glimpse of how Midnight offers scalable privacy via selective disclosure.

Rational privacy makes sure that transaction data is still private by default, while particular information can be shared with authorised parties when needed. This flexibility helps in balancing transparency and confidentiality on the blockchain via different disclosure views, specified as public, auditor, and god, each having a different access level.

The simulation, organised at Midnight City, became functional at 10:00 a.m. Hong Kong time Thursday; however, public access to the simulation stays prohibited until Feb 26, as per the press release.

The simulation, operating on the Midnight network and enrolling AI-driven agents that collaborate to make a steady flow of transactions, indicates how finely the blockchain can perform real-world demand and scales according to it.

IOG mentioned that this test shows the capability of the network to keep generating and processing proofs at scale, a significant step in proving it is ready for real-world use.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Human API Launches Platform Enabling Direct AI-to-Human Task Coordination

TagsCharles HoskinsonHong KongMainnet Launch

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhen is the Midnight mainnet scheduled to launch, according to Charles Hoskinson?

AThe Midnight mainnet is scheduled to officially roll out in the last week of March.

QWhat two major partnerships did Hoskinson announce to help run the Midnight blockchain?

AThe two major partnerships announced are Google and Telegram.

QWhat key technology does Midnight use to enable selective data disclosure?

AMidnight leverages zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs to permit selective disclosure.

QWhat is the name of the interactive platform that provides a glimpse into how Midnight offers scalable privacy?

AThe interactive platform is called the Midnight City Simulation.

QOn what date does the Midnight City Simulation become publicly accessible?

APublic access to the simulation will be available on February 26.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片