Hong Kong Unveils New Rules To Allow Crypto Margin Financing And Perpetual Contracts

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-02-12Actualizado a 2026-02-12

Resumen

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has introduced new rules allowing licensed virtual asset brokers to offer crypto margin financing and perpetual contracts to professional investors. Under the ASPIRe roadmap's Pillar P, eligible clients with strong credit and sufficient collateral can use Bitcoin and Ether as collateral for margin trading. The move aims to enhance market liquidity, provide risk management tools, and strengthen Hong Kong's position as a global virtual asset hub. The SFC emphasized the need for robust risk controls, as these products carry distinct risks. Executive Director Eric Yip stated that these measures are part of a broader strategy to cultivate market depth and investor confidence through regulated innovation.

Hong Kong financial authorities have announced new rules to expand the scope of product offerings, allowing the integration of crypto margin financing and perpetual contracts into the local virtual assets market.

Hong Kong Approves Crypto Margin Financing, Perps

On Wednesday, Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) unveiled a framework for licensed corporations that provide virtual asset dealing services (VA brokers) to offer virtual asset financing.

According to the SFC’s circular, the financial watchdog will permit VA brokers to extend credit to margin clients with strong credit profiles and sufficient securities collateral, under Pillar P of its Access, Safeguards, Products, Infrastructure and Relationships (ASPIRe) roadmap.

This will allow eligible margin clients to “increase their participation in VA trading, which can enhance the liquidity of Hong Kong’s VA market. At the same time, this can also facilitate the development of VA financing in a risk-controlled environment.”

Under the new guidance, only the two leading cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH), will be eligible as VA collateral. The regulator also released a high-level framework for licensed virtual asset trading platforms to offer crypto perpetual contracts to professional investors.

“Under the ASPIRe roadmap, Pillar P reflects the SFC’s commitment to expanding the scope of product offerings, including Perps. This initiative aims to deepen market liquidity, broaden risk management tools for investors, and further strengthen Hong Kong’s position as a leading global virtual asset hub,” the watchdog affirmed.

The SFC emphasized that the introduction of Perps will bring new opportunities to the market, but noted that it also carries “a range of risks that are distinct from those associated with traditional futures or spot trading of virtual assets.”

Therefore, the framework requires platform operators to have robust management measures and transparent processes governing valuation, margining, collateralization, and liquidation management.

Hong Kong Digital Landscape In ‘Defining Stage’

Speaking at Consensus Hong Kong 2026 on Wednesday, Eric Yip, SFC’s Executive Director of Intermediaries, shared his views on the watchdog’s regulatory enhancements for the next phase of Hong Kong’s crypto assets ecosystem.

Yip affirmed that Hong Kong’s crypto asset development has entered a “defining stage, shaped by the SFC’s ASPIRe roadmap that outlines a future-proof regulatory framework aimed at deepening market quality, resilience, and global competitiveness.”

He emphasized this year’s focus on liquidity, “cultivating market depth, strengthening price discovery, and building investor confidence through a strategic blend of expanded access and responsible product innovation.”

As the executive explained, the SFC is expanding the city’s crypto product suite under Pillar P while maintaining regulatory guardrails aligned with traditional financial market standards.

Notably, Yip highlighted the SFC’s greenlight of crypto margin financing, which will be anchored to the existing securities margin financing framework. He noted that it will provide clarification on the use of crypto assets as collateral, “enabling responsible leverage that supports liquidity without undermining financial stability.”

In addition, he also outlined the new high-level framework for leveraged perpetual contracts for professional investors, which sets out a principles-based model.

Discussing how to bridge innovation and regulatory clarity, he pointed to the upcoming Digital Asset Accelerator to be set up under Pillar Re, which will serve as a structured communication channel between the regulatory agency and industry innovators.

He concluded that “liquidity does not emerge organically; it must be cultivated through openness, strong governance, and a purposeful regulatory design. Through targeted access reforms, product expansion, and structured innovation support, Hong Kong is well-positioned to become a leading global digital assets centre where liquidity thrives on a foundation of integrity, resilience, and international cooperation.”

Bitcoin trades at $68,307 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat new financial products has Hong Kong's SFC approved for the virtual assets market?

AHong Kong's SFC has approved crypto margin financing and perpetual contracts for professional investors.

QWhich two specific cryptocurrencies are eligible to be used as collateral under the new margin financing rules?

AOnly Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) are eligible as virtual asset collateral under the new guidance.

QWhat is the name of the SFC's roadmap that outlines this new regulatory framework?

AThe regulatory framework is part of the SFC's ASPIRe (Access, Safeguards, Products, Infrastructure and Relationships) roadmap.

QAccording to the SFC executive, what stage has Hong Kong's crypto asset development entered?

AAccording to Eric Yip, Hong Kong's crypto asset development has entered a 'defining stage'.

QWhat is the primary goal of introducing these new products like margin financing and perpetual contracts?

AThe primary goals are to enhance market liquidity, broaden risk management tools for investors, and strengthen Hong Kong's position as a leading global virtual asset hub.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

**Title: Analyzing AI's Impact on Economic Growth and Productivity** This article examines three contrasting views on AI's influence on economic growth and productivity. **The Optimistic View** posits that AI, especially through automating R&D ("recursive self-improvement"), could dramatically accelerate growth, even triggering a technological "singularity" with explosive, potentially infinite, economic expansion. **The Moderate/Mainstream View** acknowledges AI's productivity benefits but emphasizes significant real-world constraints that could limit its impact. These include: limited cost savings per task, structural ceilings on which jobs and industries are "exposed" to AI, adoption bottlenecks (e.g., compute, energy, regulatory hurdles), and the "weak link" effect where non-automatable tasks cap overall gains. Consequently, the realized AI dividend may be far lower than optimistic projections, with estimates typically ranging from 0.1% to 1.3% annual productivity growth. **The Pessimistic View** stems from two strands. The first aligns with the moderate view but applies extremely conservative assumptions about task exposure and efficiency gains, yielding minimal projected impact. The second introduces a demand-side critique: if AI primarily replaces rather than augments labor, it could depress labor's share of income, weaken consumer demand, and create a "demand trap" that ultimately stifles growth, unless offset by redistribution policies. **The authors' assessment** is nuanced: * **Short-term (1-2 years):** AI will support growth primarily through investment spending, not significant productivity gains. * **Medium-term (3-5 years):** Three potential paths emerge based on AI demand and bottleneck severity: 1. **"Optimistic Path":** High demand, few bottlenecks. Rapid productivity gains but risk of major job displacement and social conflict without redistribution. 2. **"Moderate Path" (most likely):** High demand but significant, surmountable bottlenecks. Leads to moderate productivity gains, financial market volatility (K-shaped returns), and sectoral job losses. 3. **"Pessimistic Path":** Low demand or severe bottlenecks. Minimal productivity and growth impact, triggering financial market corrections but allowing a smoother societal transition with less labor disruption. * **Long-term:** AI holds potential for a major productivity revolution and prosperity. The conclusion stresses that no path is smooth. Technologically "optimistic" outcomes could be socially detrimental, while "pessimistic" technological diffusion might be more socially stable. Policymakers must monitor developments and prepare balanced responses to manage economic, financial, and social sustainability.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Analyzing the Impact of AI on Economic Growth and Productivity

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War The article argues that the contemporary geopolitical and economic rivalry between the US and China represents a "New Cold War," but one fundamentally fought through technology and financial markets, not physical barriers or conventional trade. Historically, US dominance was secured through financial systems. The Soviet Union, reliant on the rigid "Transferable Ruble," was ultimately undermined by its dependency on the US dollar for oil trade. Later, Japan's semiconductor challenge was countered not just by tariffs (e.g., Plaza Accord, 301 investigations) but by binding it to US Treasury bonds. China presents a more complex, "embedded" challenger. While it holds vast dollar reserves and US debt like Japan, its industrial base is stronger and more diversified than the Soviet Union's. Surviving the initial 2018 trade war phase, the conflict has evolved into a "tech-financial war." The core battlefield is now the stock market. US tech stocks (AI, semiconductors) are treated as sovereign assets, buoyed by bipartisan national will. China is pushing to strengthen its own financial markets to convert industrial strength into financial power and fund its tech ambitions. Companies like ChangXin (semiconductors), Moonshot AI, and DJI compete not just for market share but as financial proxies for their respective systems. The new paradigm is moving from globally efficient monopolies (Apple, Google) towards companies that achieve monopolistic profits within their respective geopolitical spheres. This competition over "pricing power" and financial valuation in segmented markets defines the current era, making the stock market the primary arena for this tech-centric struggle.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

The New Cold War is a Tech Stock War

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片