Hong Kong to Allow Institutional Crypto Perpetual Futures Under New Rules

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-11Actualizado a 2026-02-11

Resumen

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is set to introduce a new regulatory framework allowing licensed trading platforms to offer cryptocurrency perpetual futures contracts. Initially limited to institutional investors, these contracts enable traders to speculate on crypto prices without an expiry date. Platforms must demonstrate robust risk management and disclosure practices. Brokers will be permitted to use Bitcoin and Ethereum as collateral for client financing, subject to strict credit standards. The SFC is also implementing measures to prevent conflicts of interest, requiring exchanges to separate market-making activities into independent units. This cautious, step-by-step approach aims to balance innovation with credibility, attract global institutions, and enhance liquidity while prioritizing transparency and risk management.

Hong Kong is planning to become a leading regulated hub for digital assets. Julia Leung, SFC Chief Executive, speaking at CoinDesk, says that the watchdog will soon publish a high-level regulatory framework that allows licensed trading platforms to offer perpetual futures contracts tied to cryptocurrencies.

Initially limited to institutional investors

Under the upcoming framework, perpetual futures allow traders to speculate on prices without an expiry date. Leung says that initially, it will be allowed only for institutional investors, and platforms must prove they can manage and disclose the risk properly. SFC will remain focused on the fair market rules for the customers.

On the other hand, regulators will allow brokers to finance the clients using selected digital assets as collateral. As the crypto markets have high volatility, the eligibility starts only with Bitcoin and Ethereum. Borrowers must meet strict credit standards. The regulators are moving cautiously with the most stable and established tokens.

SFC is also refining the exchanges that want to run market-making operations; they must separate those activities into independent units and maintain clear conflict of interest controls. This is aimed at preventing exchanges that might see the users’ trading activity and can use that information to make money.

Reason behind this move

The SFC is trying to balance innovation and credibility. The official wants more sophisticated products and greater participation from global institutions. Instead of approving everything at once, the regulators are widening the access step by step.

If this move has been implemented, then Hong Kong could attract hedge funds and trading firms that rely on perpetuals and will increase liquidity in local regulated venues. But the regulator’s goal is clear: that innovations will be welcomed within a framework that prioritizes transparency and risk management.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Ethereum Remains Under Pressure as Price Consolidates Near $2,000

TagsCryptoCryptocurrencyHong Kong

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat new type of cryptocurrency product will Hong Kong allow under its upcoming regulatory framework?

AHong Kong will allow licensed trading platforms to offer perpetual futures contracts tied to cryptocurrencies.

QWho will be permitted to trade these crypto perpetual futures initially?

AInitially, trading will be allowed only for institutional investors.

QWhich two cryptocurrencies are eligible to be used as collateral for client financing under the new rules?

ABitcoin and Ethereum are the eligible cryptocurrencies that can be used as collateral.

QWhat is one of the key requirements for exchanges that want to run market-making operations?

AThey must separate their market-making activities into independent units and maintain clear conflict of interest controls.

QWhat is the primary goal of the SFC in implementing these new regulations, according to the article?

AThe SFC is trying to balance innovation and credibility, welcoming innovations within a framework that prioritizes transparency and risk management.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

NVIDIA's Rubin Ultra, the top-tier variant of the newly announced Rubin AI accelerators, has reportedly seen significant specification downgrades, according to an industry report from SemiAnalysis. Initially designed with four compute dies (4-die), the Rubin Ultra is now said to be reduced to a 2-die design. Key changes highlighted in the report include: * **No increase in peak theoretical compute performance**, remaining at 35 PFLOPs like the standard Rubin. * **Severe reduction in memory capacity** to 192GB using 8-Hi HBM stacks, which is less than the standard Rubin's 288GB using 12-Hi stacks. * **Negligible memory bandwidth improvement** of only 1 TB/s. * **Slightly higher chip-level power consumption**. * The **primary upgrade is a massive increase in scale-up interconnect capacity**, supporting connections for up to 576 GPUs via NVLink, compared to 72 for the standard Rubin. The report suggests the redesign is primarily a cost-optimization move driven by the sharp rise in HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) prices. By reducing the expensive HBM content and shifting investment towards enhanced system-scale networking, NVIDIA aims to maintain the platform's value for large-scale AI training clusters while managing soaring material costs. The news reportedly triggered a sell-off in South Korean memory stocks, with SK Hynix and Samsung shares falling around 8%, as markets grew concerned that NVIDIA—a major HBM buyer—might be reducing its reliance on high-capacity memory, potentially capping future pricing power for memory makers.

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

Odaily星球日报Hace 11 min(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片