Hester Peirce Urges Early SEC Talks on Tokenized ETFs

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-17Actualizado a 2026-03-17

Resumen

Hester Peirce, a commissioner at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has urged asset managers and crypto companies to engage with regulators early in the development of tokenized ETFs and other blockchain-based products. She emphasized that the SEC is open to discussing product design proactively rather than taking enforcement action after launch. Peirce encouraged direct submissions of proposals and highlighted the agency’s willingness to consider tailored exemptions for crypto firms. She also addressed the growing interest in tokenization and clarified that the SEC’s role is to ensure compliance with disclosure rules and legal limits, not to judge investment quality. The shift reflects changing perspectives on blockchain technology within the financial industry.

Hester Peirce has urged asset managers to engage regulators to clear a path for new exchange-traded structures and tokenized products.

As per the latest remarks to media and industry audiences, Peirce has publicly invited asset managers and crypto companies to come in and talk as they advance tokenized asset products, indicating that the agency is willing to engage early in product design instead of waiting until later to take enforcement action.

This quick move induced various reporters to reach out to the commissioner for further clarification. Replying to the request, Peirce mentioned that the agency wants companies to submit proposals directly as markets evolve.

Adding more to this, she highlighted the intentions of the agency for a more tailored revolution exemption for crypto firms and discussed oversight of leveraged ETFs. This was after Peirce suggested that companies advancing tokenized instruments involve the SEC during early advancement.

To break down her point for clear understanding, the commissioner further mentioned that they really want crypto firms to actively engage in dialogue with the agency regarding their intention.

The Changed Perspectives

Eventually, she made public the commitment of the SEC to collaborate with sponsors to assess market demand for these products. As per Peirce, blockchain-based securities are still under consideration by asset managers for inclusion in ETFs.

Adding more to this, she highlighted that the SEC prefers direct communication over informal compliance assumptions, further mentioning that staff expect more legal and technical questions as tokenisation surges.

Peirce evaluated that various companies showed heightened interest in tokenisation by submitting constant tokenisation proposals to the SEC. In this situation, she mentioned the perspectives of the people on blockchain technology have changed prominently recently, accepting that many individuals have approached them to highlight various advantages of tokenisation.

Regarding the focus of the SEC on highly leveraged exchange-traded funds, Peirce mentioned that the agency does not judge whether products are good investments but must make sure they comply with disclosure regulations and legal limits.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Zcash (ZEC) Jumps 12%: Can the Momentum Fuel a Bigger Weekly Run?

TagsETFHester PeirceSEC

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat has Hester Peirce urged asset managers to do regarding tokenized products?

AHester Peirce has urged asset managers to engage with regulators early to clear a path for new exchange-traded structures and tokenized products, and to submit proposals directly as markets evolve.

QHow does the SEC prefer to engage with companies developing tokenized asset products?

AThe SEC prefers direct communication and early engagement during product design, rather than waiting until later to take enforcement action.

QWhat did Peirce highlight about the SEC's approach to crypto firms and exemptions?

APeirce highlighted the SEC's intention to provide a more tailored revolution exemption for crypto firms and discussed oversight of leveraged ETFs.

QAccording to Peirce, how have perspectives on blockchain technology changed recently?

APerspectives on blockchain technology have changed prominently, with many individuals approaching the SEC to highlight various advantages of tokenization, and companies have shown heightened interest by submitting constant tokenization proposals.

QWhat is the SEC's focus regarding highly leveraged exchange-traded funds?

AThe SEC does not judge whether products are good investments but ensures they comply with disclosure regulations and legal limits.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Reddit Crypto Discussion: Tech Stocks Surge for 8 Months, Is the Crypto Community Starting to 'Accept Fate'?

Reddit Crypto Discussion: Has the Community 'Given Up' as Tech Stocks Soar? A recent post on Reddit's r/CryptoMarkets asking if the crypto market feels "dead" compared to surging tech stocks has sparked intense debate. The discussion highlights a community grappling with underperformance: Bitcoin is down ~44% from its October 2025 high and ~20% YTD in 2026, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 have gained significantly. The debate features classic opposing views. Some users, citing Bitcoin's history, are "cycle believers" who anticipate a return to form, arguing it has "died" many times before. Others counter that crypto's narratives keep shifting without delivering a stable, compelling real-world use case beyond speculation. A prevalent third view pinpoints AI as the core issue: the tech sector's transformative boom is absorbing all attention and capital, while crypto lacks a comparable, impactful utility. Data supports the pessimistic mood. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw their largest monthly net outflow in May 2026 (~$2.3B), indicating institutional de-risking. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index has fallen to "Fear" levels. When asked about the timing of a potential market rotation back to crypto, answers are uncertain. A key practical point raised is the current high-interest-rate environment, which makes stable yields from cash and bonds attractive, reducing incentive to move into volatile assets like crypto. The underlying anxiety, as one user summarized, is "opportunity cost"—the worry about missing gains elsewhere while waiting for a crypto revival.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Reddit Crypto Discussion: Tech Stocks Surge for 8 Months, Is the Crypto Community Starting to 'Accept Fate'?

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Chatbot has been burning money for three years, is it still the 'New Continent' of the AI era?

For years, the AI industry has been guided by a singular "map" — the belief that the AI era's "new continent" would be found in the Chatbot, a super-app akin to the mobile internet's super-apps. This belief was fueled by ChatGPT's explosive 2022 debut. However, three years of heavy investment reveal a different reality: the Chatbot-as-ultimate-entry-point model is struggling. The core issue is economic. Chatbots defy traditional internet economics. Unlike apps with near-zero marginal cost, each AI query consumes significant, expensive compute. More users mean higher costs, not profits. OpenAI, despite ~900M weekly active users, reportedly loses money. The expected network effects and data flywheels that power internet giants are weak in Chatbots, as one user's interactions don't improve another's experience. Monetization is a major hurdle. The subscription model faces low conversion rates, especially in China where users expect AI to be free. The "free + ads" model also struggles. Chatbot interactions often lack commercial intent, and inserting ads compromises the trust essential for an answer engine. Perplexity's minimal ad revenue and subsequent pivot away from ads highlight this difficulty. Switching between Chatbots is easy, making user loyalty low and competition a potential race to the bottom on price. Data suggests the standalone Chatbot's growth is slowing, and user engagement (avg. ~6 mins/day) pales compared to apps like TikTok. The product form itself is limiting; studies show nearly half of interactions are simple Q&A, trapping AI's potential in a passive, single-turn "cage." A contrasting, more successful path is emerging, exemplified by Anthropic. With over 85% of its ~$30B annualized revenue from enterprises, it focuses on AI as a productivity tool, not a companion. The rise of AI Agents (like OpenClaw) and the integration of AI into existing workflows (e.g., Google's AI Overviews, Apple Intelligence in OS) signal a shift. The future may not be a dominant Chatbot app, but AI embedded seamlessly into social apps, operating systems, and hardware — a capability-layer revolution, not a new distribution container. The conclusion is clear: the old "map" centered on a standalone Chatbot super-app is leading to a dead end. To find the true valuable "continent" of the AI era, the industry must update its navigation to prioritize deep integration, practical utility, and sustainable economics over a generic conversation window.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Chatbot has been burning money for three years, is it still the 'New Continent' of the AI era?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片