Hawk Tuah Influencer Says Memecoin Collapse Left Her Traumatized, But Critics Push Back

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-23Actualizado a 2026-03-23

Resumen

Hawk Tuah influencer Hailey Welsh says the collapse of the HAWK memecoin in December 2024 left her traumatized. The token surged to a $490 million market cap before crashing over 90% the next day. Welsh claims she was only a promoter, received no profits, and faced death threats after the incident. She was cleared by an FBI investigation and excluded from an investor lawsuit targeting the token’s creators. Despite warnings from the crypto community, she launched the token without fully understanding the risks. Welsh now advises others to avoid crypto entirely. Estimated losses from the failed launch are around $200,000.

Her lawyer puts the total losses from the botched HAWK token launch at roughly $200,000 — a figure that, in the world of crypto, barely registers. But for Hailey Welsh, better known online as the “Hawk Tuah Girl,” the fallout from that December 2024 disaster was anything but small.

Hawk Tuah: Death Threats And Silence Followed The Crash

Welsh told YouTube channel Channel 5 that she went into hiding for months after the token’s collapse, driven there by a wave of death threats and public anger.

“I’m sitting here, and I’m the one getting hit for this,” she said. “It’s rough.” She described pulling her head down whenever she stepped outside, bracing for hostility wherever she went. The experience, she said, left her traumatized.

The HAWK memecoin launched in December 2024 and exploded almost immediately. Within hours, its market cap surged past $490 million. Then it collapsed just as fast — down more than 90% the next day, bottoming out around $40 million.

It has since fallen to just over $1 million. The crash was widely labeled a rug pull, though Welsh insists she had no hand in engineering it.

She told Channel 5’s Andrew Callaghan that she was approached and agreed to promote the coin without fully grasping what she was getting into.

She said she received none of the proceeds and lacked the technical knowledge to launch a token in the first place. A Federal Bureau of Investigation probe examined her role in 2025. Investigators cleared her of any wrongdoing.

Lawsuit Targets Creators, Not Welsh

An investor lawsuit filed in December 2024 named the team and entities behind the coin — not Welsh. The suit alleged those parties sold unregistered securities.

Welsh was kept out of the legal action entirely, which tracks with her account of being a public face rather than a decision-maker.

BTCUSD now trading at $68,777. Chart: TradingView

Still, not everyone is moved by her version of events. Onchain analyst ZachXBT said the broader crypto community had warned Welsh repeatedly not to move forward with a token launch.

She launched one anyway. When it collapsed, he said, she went quiet while investors absorbed the losses.

Hawk Tuah Girl Now Tells Others To Avoid Crypto Entirely

More than a year after the incident, Welsh says she still does not understand the crypto industry. Her advice to anyone considering getting involved: stay out.

She told Callaghan that people need to be careful about what they attach their name to — a lesson she learned the hard way.

Whether Welsh was a victim, a willing participant, or something in between remains a matter of debate. What is not in dispute is that the coin was launched, it failed, and real people lost money.

Her lawyer’s $200,000 estimate of retail losses may sound modest against the token’s once-massive valuation, but it was real money that belonged to real people who bought in on her name.

Featured image from Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total estimated loss from the HAWK token launch as stated by Hailey Welsh's lawyer?

AHer lawyer put the total losses at roughly $200,000.

QWhat was the peak market capitalization of the HAWK memecoin and what did it fall to the next day?

AIts market cap surged past $490 million and then collapsed by more than 90% the next day, bottoming out around $40 million.

QWhat was the outcome of the Federal Bureau of Investigation probe into Hailey Welsh's role in the token launch?

AInvestigators cleared her of any wrongdoing.

QAccording to onchain analyst ZachXBT, what did the crypto community do before the token launch?

AZachXBT said the broader crypto community had warned Welsh repeatedly not to move forward with a token launch.

QWhat is Hailey Welsh's current stance on the crypto industry after the incident?

AHer advice is for anyone considering getting involved to stay out of crypto entirely.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHace 33 min(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 43 min(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片