Has Elon Musk Completely Abandoned Dogecoin? Here’s The Last Time He Tweeted About It

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-13Actualizado a 2026-03-13

Resumen

Elon Musk, a key figure behind Dogecoin's massive 36,000% rally in 2021, has significantly reduced his public engagement with the meme cryptocurrency. His last direct tweet about Dogecoin was over a year ago, in November 2024, where he defended its flat inflation mechanism as a feature rather than a flaw. Although Musk still subtly endorses Dogecoin by liking and reposting related content, his direct mentions have ceased. Furthermore, the recent launch of X Money (formerly Twitter) shows no integration of Dogecoin, despite earlier hopes. The payment feature, along with previous initiatives like Tip Jar, supports only Bitcoin and Ethereum, signaling a shift away from Dogecoin in Musk’s ventures.

Elon Musk’s role in the growth of Dogecoin over the years cannot be overstated, as the billionaire served as the cornerstone of the 36,000% rally that caught attention back in 2021. The support for the meme coin also continued long after this, moving Dogecoin into the payments sector as well. However, following Musk’s acquisition of Twitter (now X) in 2023, his involvement and tweets about the meme coin began to decline, and have become nonexistent in the last year.

When Did Elon Musk Last Tweet About Dogecoin?

Doing a search on Elon Musk’s account on X shows that his last tweet directly mentioning Dogecoin was more than a year ago. The tweet, which was made back in November 2024, was explaining why the inflation mechanism used for the cryptocurrency was actually important.

According to Musk, Dogecoin having a flat inflation rate was actually a feature of its creation and not a bug. This is because the flat inflation rate translates to a decreasing percentage inflation, and is therefore a good thing for the digital asset to have.

Related Reading: Buying XRP At These Prices Is Like Buying Bitcoin At $200

Interestingly, this is the only tweet that mentioned Dogecoin directly that came up on Musk’s account for the year 2024. Other tweets were back in 2023, moving into 2022, when the billionaire was still very active in his support for Dogecoin. But despite not mentioning Dogecoin directly, Musk has continued to subtly show support for the meme coin by endorsing posts about DOGE, as well as reposting posts made by other X users.

No Sign Of DOGE In X Money

Even though Elon Musk has been vocal in the past about the merits of Dogecoin as a payment cryptocurrency, the launch of the new X Money feature could be the final nail in the coffin that suggests the X owner is moving away from the meme coin. There have been multiple leaks of the X Money feature from a closed testing phase, but none of them show or mention DOGE being used in the app.

Earlier in the week, Musk announced that the company was ready to launch early public access for X Money in April. But still, there has been no sign of DOGE. So far, there have been reports of X Money offering a card, allowing users to earn interest on cash, allowing direct deposits, cash backs, and easy money transfers between users, with the feature working like a bank. However, there has been no mention of DOGE or any cryptocurrencies for that matter.

Even with the launch of the Tip Jar feature, which allowed X users to send crypto to other X users, only the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum made the cut. So far, there has been no integration of Dogecoin into X, dashing the hopes that investors had when the billionaire had first acquired Twitter amid the hype.

DOGE begins another recovery trend | Source: DOGEUSDT on Tradingview.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhen was the last time Elon Musk directly tweeted about Dogecoin, and what did he say?

AElon Musk's last direct tweet about Dogecoin was on November 13, 2024. He stated that Dogecoin's flat inflation rate, which results in a decreasing percentage inflation, is a feature, not a bug.

QWhat evidence from the article suggests that Elon Musk might be moving away from Dogecoin?

AThe evidence includes his significant decline in tweets about Dogecoin, the lack of any mention or integration of DOGE in the new X Money feature, and the fact that only Bitcoin and Ethereum were included in X's Tip Jar feature.

QWhat is the 'X Money' feature, and how does its launch relate to Dogecoin?

AX Money is a new feature on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter) that offers banking-like services such as a card, earning interest on cash, direct deposits, cash back, and money transfers. Its launch is significant because there has been no mention or integration of Dogecoin or any other cryptocurrency, despite Musk's past promotion of DOGE for payments.

QBesides direct tweets, how has Elon Musk shown subtle support for Dogecoin on X?

AHe has shown subtle support by endorsing posts about DOGE and reposting content from other X users that is related to the meme coin.

QWhat was Elon Musk's historical role in the Dogecoin market according to the article?

AElon Musk's role was a cornerstone of Dogecoin's massive growth, being instrumental in its 36,000% rally in 2021. He continued to support the meme coin long after, helping to move it into the payments sector.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

United Stables' U token has surpassed $1 billion in market capitalization, with Chainlink Data Feeds providing the critical pricing and collateral data infrastructure across its deployment chains. This milestone highlights that robust oracle infrastructure is essential for stablecoin credibility, as DeFi protocols require reliable data for integration. Chainlink's role is foundational, enabling automated collateral auditing and pricing verification, which helps make the U token safer for the broader market to evaluate and use. While this strengthens Chainlink's position in the stablecoin infrastructure narrative, it does not directly guarantee increased fees or value for LINK token holders. The growth of U indicates both widening competition in the stablecoin sector and the increasing dependence of scalable stablecoins on dependable external data services.

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

United Stables Crosses $1B As Chainlink Data Feeds Secure U Token Collateral

bitcoinistHace 1 hora(s)

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

The BonkDAO treasury suffered an approximately $20 million drain due to a malicious governance proposal passed through the Realms platform on Solana. This incident highlights governance as a critical attack surface for DAOs, distinct from smart contract exploits. The attack leveraged the DAO's own voting mechanics to move funds, demonstrating that flawed governance design—such as weak proposal rules or voter weight calculations—can be exploited even when the underlying blockchain functions correctly. The event serves as a warning for Solana DAOs to rigorously review and strengthen their governance safeguards, including quorum thresholds, timelocks, and execution permissions. While damaging to community trust, especially for the prominent BONK meme ecosystem, the issue is not a failure of the Solana base layer but a widespread application-level risk common across blockchain ecosystems.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

BonkDAO Treasury Drain Shows Solana Governance Risk Is Real

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

Midnight's NIGHT token plummeted roughly 30% following a $13.2 million exploit on a Wanchain cross-chain bridge. The attacker drained 515 million NIGHT tokens by exploiting a signature reuse flaw in the bridge's infrastructure, not the core Cardano or Midnight networks. This incident highlights the persistent vulnerability of cross-chain bridges, which are critical for asset transfers but introduce complex security risks. While the underlying blockchains remained secure, the token's price suffered due to liquidity disruption and lost market confidence. The response from Wanchain, including pausing the affected bridge and providing clear communication on recovery efforts, will be crucial for stabilizing the situation. The event serves as a reminder for traders to factor in bridge-related risks when evaluating tokens reliant on cross-chain liquidity.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Midnight Token Falls After $13M Wanchain Bridge Exploit

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片