Hackers and Scammers Stole $4 Billion in Cryptocurrencies in 2025

RBK-cryptoPublicado a 2026-01-13Actualizado a 2026-01-13

Resumen

In 2025, hackers and fraudsters stole over $4 billion in cryptocurrencies, a 34.2% increase compared to the $3.01 billion stolen in 2024, according to analytics firm PeckShieldAlert. The total damage exceeded $4.04 billion, with $2.67 billion (a 24.2% annual increase) attributed to hacks and $1.37 billion (a 64.2% increase) to fraud cases. A strategic shift was noted towards a rise in scams utilizing social engineering methods, such as psychological manipulation to trick victims into revealing confidential information, which accounted for 12% of the losses. The most significant single incident was the $1.4 billion hack of the Bybit exchange in February of the previous year. An additional 22% of losses came from scams, including 'rug pulls' and pseudo-crypto investment schemes. Another key change was the increasing share of centralized services among the affected platforms. Their share of losses grew from just over 35% in 2023 to around 45% in 2024, and exceeded 70% in 2025. Only about $334.9 million of the stolen funds were frozen or returned during the year, a decrease from the $488.5 million recovered in 2024.

Damage to crypto industry participants increased by 34% compared to 2024

Due to hacks and fraud with cryptocurrencies in 2025, more than $4 billion was lost, according to analysts at PeckShieldAlert. According to their data, this is 34.2% more than in 2024, when $3.01 billion worth of cryptocurrency was stolen.

Damage from hacks and fraud with cryptocurrencies in 2025. Source: PeckShield

The total damage in 2025 exceeded $4.04 billion. Of this, $2.67 billion came from losses due to hacks (a 24.2% year-on-year increase) and $1.37 billion was attributed to cases of fraud (a 64.2% increase).

rbc.group

RBC-Crypto Telegram Channel — subscribe and stay up to date with the most important and relevant news about cryptocurrencies.

Join the RBC-Crypto forum on Telegram to discuss news and trends in the crypto world.

The report emphasizes that a strategic shift is occurring — the number of thefts using social engineering methods (psychological techniques and manipulations that force the victim to disclose confidential information that the attacker could use to steal funds) is growing. Analysts attributed 12% of the losses in 2025 to incidents where such methods were used.

66% of the total damage came from hacks, the most serious being the theft of $1.4 billion from the Bybit exchange in February of last year. Another 22% of losses came from scams, including "rug pulls" (when developers withdraw liquidity at the price peak) and pseudo-cryptoinvestments.

Another important change was the increase in the share of centralized services among the affected platforms. If in 2023 they accounted for just over 35%, in 2024 it was already around 45%, and in 2025 — over 70%.

Over the year, only about $334.9 million of the stolen funds was frozen or returned. PeckShield noted a decrease compared to 2024, when $488.5 million was recovered.

Cardano Founder: Trump's Policy Pushed Suburbs Away from Cryptocurrency

Former New York 'Bitcoin Mayor' Faces Charges in Crypto Fraud

The First Bitcoin Transaction Was Executed 17 Years Ago. Who Received These Coins

Criptos en tendencia

Haedal ProtocolHAEDAL

Preguntas relacionadas

QHow much was stolen in cryptocurrencies due to hacks and fraud in 2025 according to PeckShieldAlert?

A$4 billion was stolen in cryptocurrencies in 2025.

QWhat was the percentage increase in losses from crypto hacks and fraud in 2025 compared to 2024?

ALosses increased by 34.2% in 2025 compared to 2024.

QWhat was the largest single crypto theft incident mentioned in the report for 2025?

AThe largest single theft was the $1.4 billion hack of the Bybit exchange in February of the previous year.

QWhat significant shift in attack methods did the PeckShield report highlight for 2025?

AThe report highlighted a strategic shift towards an increase in the number of scams using social engineering methods, which accounted for 12% of the losses.

QWhat percentage of the total losses in 2025 were attributed to centralized services?

AOver 70% of the total losses in 2025 were attributed to centralized services.

Lecturas Relacionadas

It was revealed that 92.7% of institutional bitcoin (BTC) reserves are held by companies based in the USA

Institutional Bitcoin reserves held by publicly traded companies are overwhelmingly concentrated in the US, according to data from Unfolded. US-based firms hold 1.24 million BTC, accounting for a staggering 92.7% of the global total held by such entities. Over the past 12 months, these companies added 510,000 BTC to their portfolios, a purchasing rate that vastly outpaced new supply. Their acquisitions were more than triple the number of new BTC mined during the same period, significantly impacting the asset's supply dynamics. This trend, heavily influenced by firms like MicroStrategy, reflects a growing institutional adoption of Bitcoin as a long-term reserve asset across sectors like energy, technology, and finance. Analysts warn this sustained institutional demand, especially after the upcoming halving which will reduce new supply, could further strain the supply-demand balance and influence long-term price trends.

cryptonews.ruHace 5 min(s)

It was revealed that 92.7% of institutional bitcoin (BTC) reserves are held by companies based in the USA

cryptonews.ruHace 5 min(s)

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ruHace 5 min(s)

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ruHace 5 min(s)

Reddit Triples Profit to $253 Million, But Notes Search Query Volatility

Reddit reported second-quarter 2026 net income of $253 million, roughly triple the $89 million from a year earlier. Revenue surged 61% year-over-year to $805 million, marking the eighth consecutive quarter of over 60% growth. Advertising revenue jumped 64% to $762 million, driven by higher ad prices and increased impressions. The company's weekly active unique users surpassed 500 million for the first time, reaching 514.6 million. However, executives flagged a concern: traffic from search engines became volatile toward the end of the quarter, creating headwinds for converting its large audience into daily users. CEO Steven Huffman noted that "AI overviews have not yet had a similarly positive impact" on search referrals compared to traditional links. Other highlights include adjusted EBITDA rising 43% to $343 million, operating cash flow of $262 million for the quarter, and the launch of Reddit's first shareholder return program with $235 million spent on share repurchases. For the current quarter, Reddit forecasts revenue between $860 million and $870 million.

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

Reddit Triples Profit to $253 Million, But Notes Search Query Volatility

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar 4

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar 4 (4) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar 4 (4) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu 4 (4)Después de comprar tu 4 (4), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear 4 (4)Tradear fácilmente con 4 (4) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

835 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.10.20Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de 4 (4).