Greenlane Treasury's $70M BERA Position Ends Q2 Valued at $16M

cryptonews.ruPublicado a 2026-08-17Actualizado a 2026-08-17

Resumen

Greenlane Holdings' cryptocurrency treasury, focused on the $BERA token, ended Q2 with its portfolio valued at $16.4 million—a drop of over 76% from its $70 million cost basis, according to regulatory filings. The company held 81.3 million $BERA tokens as of June 30. This $53.8 million difference led to a non-cash impairment loss of $19.1 million for the quarter, contributing to a net loss of $24.8 million. The digital assets segment generated $309,000 in staking and yield income during the same period. Greenlane, a Nasdaq-listed firm that pivoted from cannabis accessories to a digital treasury strategy, designated $BERA as its primary reserve asset in October 2025. Despite increasing its holdings since March, the token's price has fallen about 75.9% this year, trading around $0.146 at the time of reporting.

Crypto treasury firm Greenlane Holdings, focused on $BERA, concluded the second quarter with a valuation of $16.4 million — less than a quarter of its $70 million cost basis, according to regulatory filings.

On Friday, the company stated it held 81.3 million $BERA and BERA-equivalent tokens as of June 30. With a $53.8 million difference between the portfolio's cost and fair value, its valuation was 76.6% below cost.

Greenlane reported a non-cash fair value revaluation loss on digital assets of $19.1 million for the quarter, increasing its net loss to $24.8 million. For the same period, its digital assets segment generated $309,000 in revenue from staking and yield operations.

Greenlane Holdings is a Nasdaq-listed company that previously sold cannabis accessories. It later pivoted to a digital treasury strategy centered on the $BERA token of the Berachain network.

The company selected $BERA as its treasury's primary reserve asset in October 2025 after completing a $110.7 million private placement. By the end of March, it held 77.7 million $BERA and equivalent tokens and subsequently increased its holdings despite their declining value.

Since the start of the year, $BERA has fallen 75.9% and was trading around $0.146 at the time of writing, according to CoinGecko. Earlier this year, the token briefly traded above $1.20 before gradually declining to around $0.15.

Related Content: Crypto Treasury Firm ZeroStack Warns of Going Concern Risk Amid $82.5M Loss

end-content

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the fair value of Greenlane Holdings' cryptocurrency treasury at the end of Q2, and how did it compare to its cost basis?

AThe fair value of Greenlane Holdings' treasury was $16.4 million at the end of Q2. This represented a 76.6% decrease compared to its cost basis of $70 million.

QWhich specific digital asset constitutes the primary reserve of Greenlane's treasury strategy?

AThe primary reserve asset of Greenlane's treasury strategy is the $BERA token of the Berachain network.

QWhat were the main financial results reported by Greenlane for the second quarter, specifically regarding net loss and revenue from its digital assets segment?

AFor Q2, Greenlane reported a net loss of $24.8 million. This included a non-cash loss of $19.1 million from fair value revaluation of digital assets. The digital assets segment generated $309,000 in revenue from staking and yield operations during the same period.

QHow has the price performance of the $BERA token been since the beginning of the year, and what was its approximate trading price at the time of the article?

ASince the beginning of the year, the $BERA token has depreciated by 75.9%. At the time of the article, it was trading at approximately $0.146.

QWhat is the previous business background of Greenlane Holdings, the Nasdaq-listed company mentioned in the article?

AGreenlane Holdings was previously a company that sold cannabis accessories before pivoting to a digital treasury strategy focused on the $BERA token.

Lecturas Relacionadas

20% of American Workers Are Offloading Tasks to AI, Where Tasks Are Replaced, Not Jobs

A recent survey by Epoch AI and Ipsos reveals that 20% of US workers report that AI has now fully or mostly taken over at least one task they previously outsourced to colleagues or contractors. The key finding is that AI is currently replacing specific *tasks*, not entire *jobs*. The study examined ten common knowledge-work tasks. While AI usage is widespread—ranging from 25% for maintaining records to 57% for software design—it rarely handles a task completely. In software design, for instance, only 10% of workers reported AI doing most or all of the work. AI's impact on time efficiency is mixed: 53% of tasks where AI does most of the work see reduced time, but about one-sixth of all AI-assisted tasks actually become *more* time-consuming. Furthermore, while 66% of AI outputs are used with little or no modification, this does not necessarily indicate high quality. Researchers note that clearly defined, deliverable tasks—traditionally suited for outsourcing—are most susceptible to AI takeover. This shift pressures task-based contractors more than it eliminates full-time roles. Adoption is also uneven, concentrated among higher-income, college-educated white-collar workers. The report concludes that the core dynamic is a reorganization of work between humans and AI. The critical question for workers is not "Will AI replace me?" but "How many of my job's components can be packaged as discrete, outsourceable tasks?"

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

20% of American Workers Are Offloading Tasks to AI, Where Tasks Are Replaced, Not Jobs

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Sam Altman Names Him: The Most Important Researcher in AI, But Almost No One Knows Him

In a recent interview, Sam Altman gave a rare and high praise, calling Alec Radford "perhaps the most important, yet least known, researcher in AI history." Widely regarded as the true father of GPT, Radford is the lead author of foundational papers including GPT-1, GPT-2, CLIP, and Whisper, and contributed significantly to GPT-3, DALL·E, Scaling Laws, and GPT-4. Despite this monumental impact, Radford remains highly private, holds no PhD, and rarely gives interviews. Altman credits OpenAI's rise to hiring the then-23-year-old in 2016. Radford's early experiments, like training a model on Amazon reviews, led to the discovery of the "unsupervised sentiment neuron," revealing that models can learn unintended capabilities from simple next-token prediction. His pivotal move was applying the Transformer architecture to language modeling, creating GPT-1 in 2018. This established the "scaling" direction—focusing on increasing model size, data, and compute—which became OpenAI's core strategy, leading to GPT-2, GPT-3, and beyond. Radford later applied the same principles beyond text. His early work on DCGAN laid groundwork for image generation. At OpenAI, he contributed to Image GPT, DALL·E, and CLIP, demonstrating that a simple, scalable training task (like matching images to text) could yield powerful, general capabilities. His work on Whisper applied this to robust speech recognition. Described by colleagues as a "once-in-a-generation genius" and exceptionally kind, Radford is known for his low profile. In late 2024, he left OpenAI for independent research. His latest project, "Talkie," is a 13-billion parameter language model trained *only* on texts published before 1931. This experiment tests if a model with no modern knowledge can quickly learn new skills (like basic Python) from few examples, probing the boundary between memorization and true learning. True to form, as the world catches up, Radford is likely already working on the next big question.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Sam Altman Names Him: The Most Important Researcher in AI, But Almost No One Knows Him

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Cursor Disappears Completely

On August 15th, Cursor, the AI-powered code editor, officially ceased to exist as an independent company after being acquired by SpaceX for a historic $60 billion. The move, announced by Cursor's own account stating it is now "part of SpaceX," marks the end of a journey that began with four MIT students building the tool in their dorm room. The acquisition grants Elon Musk's ecosystem a crucial component: vast amounts of real-world programming data and workflow from Cursor's 5 million enterprise users. This data will integrate with SpaceX's infrastructure (like the Colossus supercomputer), xAI's Grok models, Tesla's autonomous driving data, and data from X, creating a formidable, vertically-integrated data moat for developing Artificial Superintelligence (ASI). A key immediate outcome is the enhancement of xAI's recently launched "Grok Bot," a persistent AI agent capable of multi-step tasks. Cursor serves as its primary delivery platform, combining cloud computing, multi-agent collaboration, and advanced coding capabilities. This positions the Grok Bot + Cursor combo to compete directly with offerings like Claude Cowork and ChatGPT Work in the enterprise AI agent market. The deal, stemming from a clause in an earlier partnership agreement, represents a complete absorption. Cursor will be dismantled, with its assets, team, and technology folded into SpaceXAI. The beloved Cursor brand itself will be retired in favor of the "Grok" umbrella (e.g., Grok Bot, Grok Build), signaling the end of its identity as a neutral, developer-centric platform. This acquisition signifies a pivotal shift in the AI landscape. It demonstrates that powerful AI applications face a binary fate: become a giant or be consumed by one. The era of neutral, model-agnostic tools may be closing, giving way to a future dominated by a few integrated super-entities like the SpaceXAI empire, Microsoft/OpenAI, and others, all competing in a "winner-takes-most" battle for ASI supremacy. Cursor's story, once a fairy tale for startups building on top of foundational models, concludes as a gear in a much larger machine.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Cursor Disappears Completely

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Is OpenRouter Worth $70 Billion?

Payment giant Stripe has reportedly finalized the acquisition of AI infrastructure startup OpenRouter for over $7 billion, significantly higher than its $1.3 billion valuation from a funding round just months prior. This has sparked intense debate over whether the platform is worth the high price tag. Opponents argue that OpenRouter’s core service — a unified API router that directs user requests to various AI models (like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) while handling load balancing and cost optimization — is easily replicable and lacks a deep technical moat. With an estimated annual revenue of $50 million, the $7B price implies a staggering 140x price-to-sales multiple. Critics question if OpenRouter is merely a transitional middleman in the evolving AI infrastructure landscape, vulnerable to being bypassed as model providers and cloud platforms integrate similar routing capabilities directly. Proponents, however, see beyond a simple API proxy. They view OpenRouter as a critical and growing "toll booth" for AI inference traffic. While it currently charges only a 5.5% platform fee on user credits, its real value lies in the aggregated user base, payment relationships, traffic data, and distribution power it has amassed. For Stripe, which processes OpenRouter's payments, this acquisition is seen as securing a strategic gateway into the future AI economy, analogous to how it built the payment "toll booth" for the internet commerce era. Ultimately, the debate centers not on OpenRouter's current financials but on two future unknowns: the ultimate size of the AI inference market and OpenRouter's ability to maintain its position as a dominant traffic orchestrator within it. Whether Stripe overpaid or has shrewdly purchased a key to the next era of AI infrastructure remains to be seen.

Odaily星球日报Hace 18 min(s)

Is OpenRouter Worth $70 Billion?

Odaily星球日报Hace 18 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar BERA

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Berachain (BERA) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Berachain (BERA) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Berachain (BERA)Después de comprar tu Berachain (BERA), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Berachain (BERA)Tradear fácilmente con Berachain (BERA) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

443 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.02.07Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar BERA

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BERA (BERA).

活动图片