Grayscale-Linked Firms Sell XRP and Solana Holdings as ETF Outflows Rise

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-03Actualizado a 2026-02-03

Resumen

Grayscale's parent company, Digital Currency Group (DCG), and its affiliate, DCG International Investment Ltd., are selling their holdings in Grayscale's Solana and XRP ETFs. This was disclosed in recent SEC filings and coincides with a broader crypto market decline of approximately $5 billion. DCG sold 26,000 shares of the Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) as Solana's price fell below $100. Simultaneously, DCG International sold 15,000 shares of the Grayscale XRP ETF (GXRP), contributing to significant outflows from these funds. These sales are presented as portfolio adjustment moves in response to market conditions rather than a shutdown of the products, signaling a cautious institutional sentiment towards these major altcoins.

Grayscale-linked companies are quietly selling their exposure to XRP and Solana when the crypto market is under pressure. The investors started pulling money out of the Altcoin ETFs, according to the recent U.S. regulatory filings. The sales come after the crypto market is wiping out around $5 billion in value, and ETF outflows signal weakening institutional confidence in some major altcoins.

The two key firms, such as Digital Currency Group (DCG), which is Grayscale’s parent company, and DCG International Investment Ltd, which is the DCG-linked investment entity, are the sellers. Both companies disclosed their sales through official U.S SEC Form 144 filings, which are required when insiders sell securities.

DCG reduces Solana Exposure

DCG sold 15,000 shares of the Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) for about $115,440. This sale happened on Feb 2, and the trade was handled by Canaccord Genuity. These shares were originally bought in January 2025, and over the past week, DCG has sold 26,000 GSOL shares in total. This activity coincides with Solana’s price dropping below $100 with 16% dip in one week, which caused around $5.5 million to be left from the Solana ETF.

DCG International cuts XRP ETF holdings

DCG International Investment Ltd sold 3,620 shares of the Grayscale XRP ETF (GXRP) worth around $115,070. The sale took place on February 2, and these shares were acquired in September 2024. The firm sold 15,000 GXRP shares last week alone. XRP ETFs faced strong selling pressure, and the price dropped below $1.60. The grayscale XRP ETF alone lost $98.39 million, with total XRP ETF outflows reaching $92.92 million.

These moves do not mean Grayscale is shutting down XRP or Solana products. They show that the firms are adjusting their positions according to market conditions. ETF outflows suggest that investors are becoming more cautious, and insider sales usually reflect portfolio adjustments.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Chainlink Slips Below $10 as Selling Pressure Continues

TagsGrayscaleSolanaxrp

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhich Grayscale-linked firms are selling their XRP and Solana holdings according to the article?

ADigital Currency Group (DCG), which is Grayscale's parent company, and DCG International Investment Ltd, a DCG-linked investment entity.

QWhat was the value of the GSOL shares sold by DCG on February 2nd?

ADCG sold 15,000 shares of the Grayscale Solana Staking ETF (GSOL) for about $115,440.

QHow much did the Grayscale XRP ETF (GXRP) lose, according to the regulatory filings?

AThe Grayscale XRP ETF alone lost $98.39 million.

QWhat do the ETF outflows and insider sales signal about institutional confidence?

AThe ETF outflows signal weakening institutional confidence in some major altcoins, and the insider sales reflect portfolio adjustments in response to market conditions.

QDoes the selling activity mean that Grayscale is shutting down its XRP or Solana products?

ANo, the moves do not mean Grayscale is shutting down XRP or Solana products. They show that the firms are adjusting their positions according to market conditions.

Lecturas Relacionadas

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

**From Survival to Accelerated Growth: Zcash Founder Details the 3-Year Rise** Three years ago, Zcash (ZEC) was a struggling pioneer in privacy technology, with a price near $30, low shielded supply (11%), and a community mired in governance disputes. Today, ZEC trades around $600, with over 31% of its supply (~$3B) in user-controlled shielded pools. This transformation resulted from breaking key constraints. First, **governance shackles were removed**. The old model guaranteed funding to two entities (ECC and ZF) regardless of performance, creating a monopoly. In 2024, ECC rejected further direct funding, forcing a change. The NU6 upgrade ended direct funding, allocating 8% to community grants and 12% to a protocol-controlled treasury for retroactive rewards, expiring in 2028 unless renewed by overwhelming consensus. The entities also relinquished their trademark-based veto power, freeing community governance. Second, the **product focus shifted** from pure cryptography to user growth. Previously, engineering excelled at privacy tech but failed to attract users. In early 2024, the team (later ZODL) pivoted to building products users wanted, like the Zodl wallet (default privacy, hardware support, cross-asset swaps). This drove shielded supply to grow over 400% in ZEC terms, with 86.5% of recent transactions being shielded, representing real user adoption. Third, the **narrative evolved** from the limiting "privacy coin" label to "unstoppable private money." This clarified Zcash's value proposition: a Bitcoin-like monetary policy with verifiable private payments via advanced cryptography. This structural narrative—protocol (Zcash), asset (ZEC), gateway (Zodl)—enabled broader exchange listings, institutional interest, and ETF filings. Finally, **organizational constraints were broken**. In early 2026, the ECC team left its non-profit structure after disputes over control, forming Zcash Open Development Lab (ZODL). ZODL raised $25M from top VCs (Paradigm, a16z, etc.), gaining the capital and agility of a startup to scale consumer products. Current metrics show strong momentum: social discussion volume for ZEC surged 15,245% in a year, with 81% positive sentiment. The focus is now on enhancing user experience (Zodl wallet), scalability (Tachyon project targeting Visa-level throughput with 25-second blocks), and post-quantum security (quantum-recoverable wallets coming soon). Zcash is positioned to become faster, more usable, scalable, and quantum-resistant.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

From Survival to Accelerated Growth: The Journey of Zcash's Three-Year Rise as Told by the Founder of ZODL

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

**Summary:** This companion piece reframes the five TradFi-on-crypto exchange architectures, previously classified by "architectural fingerprint," through the lens of counterparty risk. The core question is: whose balance sheet bears the loss first in a stress scenario, and has it historically done so? Each of the five models corresponds to a distinct risk holder with its own documented failure modes. * **Model 1 (Stablecoin-Settled CEX Perpetuals):** Risk is held by the stablecoin issuer (e.g., reserve composition, bank connectivity) and the CEX's own book. History includes Tether's banking disconnections (2017) and reserve misrepresentations (CFTC 2021 Order). * **Model 2 (CFD Brokers):** Risk resides on the broker's balance sheet (B-book model). Regulatory differences (e.g., ESMA's mandatory negative balance protection vs. Mauritius FSC's lack thereof) define loss allocation rules, as seen in the 2015 SNB event (Alpari UK insolvency). * **Model 3 (Off-Chain Custody & Transfer Agent Chain):** Risk lies with the off-chain custodian/platform. User asset recovery depends on Terms of Use and corporate structure, exemplified by the Celsius bankruptcy ruling (2023) where Earn Account assets were deemed property of the estate. * **Model 4 (DEX Perpetual Protocols):** No single balance sheet bears risk. Loss absorption relies on a protocol's insurance fund and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL) mechanism, as demonstrated in the GMX V1 (2022) and dYdX v3 YFI (2023) incidents. * **Model 5 (Regulated CCP - DCM-DCO-FCM):** The most institutionalized model concentrates risk in the Central Counterparty (CCP). However, history shows CCPs can employ non-standard tools under extreme stress, such as mass trade cancellation (LME Nickel, 2022) or enabling negative price settlements (CME WTI, 2020). The report argues that regulatory choices and counterparty risk structures are co-extensive, not in an upstream-downstream relationship. It concludes with five separate observation checklists (not predictions) for monitoring the structural vulnerabilities of each risk model.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Five Counterparty Risk Architectures: A Settlement-Layer Methodology for Classifying TradFi Models in Crypto Exchanges

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片