Grayscale Files to List Aave ETF on NYSE Arca

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-16Actualizado a 2026-02-16

Resumen

Grayscale has filed with the SEC to convert its Aave Trust into an ETF, to be listed on NYSE Arca under the ticker "GAVE." The proposed fund would hold AAVE tokens directly and charge a 2.5% sponsor fee. This move signals continued institutional interest in altcoins and decentralized finance, despite recent market volatility. Aave is the largest decentralized lending protocol by total value locked, with over $27 billion across multiple blockchains. Grayscale joins Bitwise, which filed for a similar Aave ETF in December, in seeking regulatory approval. If approved, this would be one of the first U.S.-listed ETFs offering direct exposure to Aave, expanding access for investors preferring regulated products.

Grayscale has filed to convert its Aave trust into an exchange-traded fund, signaling renewed institutional interest in altcoins. The crypto asset manager submitted a Form S-1 registration statement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Friday, seeking approval to rename the product the Grayscale Aave Trust ETF.

The firm plans to list the ETF on NYSE Arca under the ticker “GAVE.” Grayscale will charge a 2.5% sponsor fee based on net asset value, payable in AAVE tokens. Coinbase will act as custodian and prime broker for the proposed fund.

The filing reflects growing competition in altcoin investment products. Grayscale now aims to offer direct exposure to Aave, the leading decentralized lending protocol.

This push comes despite broader market volatility. Investors have cooled toward speculative tokens in recent months. However, Grayscale’s filing suggests Wall Street still sees long-term value in DeFi exposure.

Aave’s DeFi Dominance Drives Interest

Aave ranks as the largest decentralized lending protocol by total value locked. According to data from DefiLlama, the platform holds more than $27 billion across multiple blockchains. Users lend and borrow digital assets while earning yield, and the AAVE token supports staking and governance.

The token currently trades near $126, well below its all-time high of nearly $662 reached in May 2021. Despite the steep drawdown, asset managers continue betting on its long-term utility. Grayscale’s proposal would hold AAVE tokens directly rather than using derivative exposure. That structure mirrors its earlier trust-to-ETF conversions, including its landmark Bitcoin trust case that opened the door for spot crypto ETFs in the United States.

Bitwise Already in the Race

Grayscale joins Bitwise in seeking regulatory approval for a standalone Aave ETF. Bitwise filed paperwork in December for its AAVE Strategy ETF, alongside proposals tied to Uniswap and Zcash.

Bitwise’s structure differs slightly. It’s proposed fund plans to hold up to 60% of assets directly in AAVE tokens and at least 40% in securities, including ETFs with Aave exposure. Grayscale, in contrast, intends to maintain direct token holdings.

The race reflects broader institutional appetite for structured crypto products. The SEC has yet to approve a U.S.-listed Aave ETF, but overseas markets already host similar offerings. In Europe, 21Shares and Global X launched Aave exchange-traded products, offering regulated exposure to investors.

If approved, Grayscale’s ETF would mark one of the first U.S. vehicles providing direct Aave exposure through traditional brokerage accounts.

Market Implications and Investor Outlook

Altcoin ETFs expand access for institutional and retail investors who prefer regulated products over direct token custody. An approved Aave ETF could deepen liquidity and enhance price discovery.

However, regulatory uncertainty remains a key variable. The SEC continues reviewing multiple crypto ETF applications. Approval could signal greater acceptance of DeFi-linked assets within U.S. markets.

For now, Grayscale’s filing underscores one clear trend: institutional players continue building infrastructure around decentralized finance, even during market downturns.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Jake Paul Associate Claims “Zero Rug Pull Risk” for New Memecoin, Analysts Push Back

TagsAAVEAltcoinsETFGrayscaleNYSE

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the Grayscale Aave Trust ETF planning to list under and what is its proposed ticker symbol?

AThe Grayscale Aave Trust ETF is planning to list on NYSE Arca under the ticker symbol 'GAVE'.

QWhat is the sponsor fee that Grayscale will charge for the proposed Aave ETF and how is it paid?

AGrayscale will charge a 2.5% sponsor fee based on the net asset value, and it is payable in AAVE tokens.

QHow does Grayscale's proposed Aave ETF structure differ from Bitwise's AAVE Strategy ETF?

AGrayscale's ETF intends to hold AAVE tokens directly, while Bitwise's proposed fund plans to hold up to 60% of assets in AAVE tokens and at least 40% in securities, including other ETFs with Aave exposure.

QWhat role will Coinbase play in the proposed Grayscale Aave ETF?

ACoinbase will act as the custodian and prime broker for the proposed Grayscale Aave Trust ETF.

QWhat is the significance of Aave's position in the DeFi ecosystem as mentioned in the article?

AAave is the largest decentralized lending protocol by total value locked, holding more than $27 billion across multiple blockchains, which drives institutional interest.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片