Gold beats Bitcoin in the ‘safe-asset’ debate once again: ‘Get out while you still can!’

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-30Actualizado a 2026-03-30

Resumen

The ongoing debate between Gold and Bitcoin as safe-haven assets continues, with recent developments favoring gold. While Bitcoin initially outperformed gold during U.S.-Iran geopolitical tensions in early March 2026—even nearing $74,000—it has since lost momentum, struggling to maintain levels above $67,000. The XAU/BTC chart shows green candles on the 4-hour timeframe, indicating gold's current outperformance, though the bounce remains minimal and lacks clear trend reversal signals, with RSI in overbought territory. The correlation between Bitcoin and Gold stands at -0.47, reflecting opposing price movements. On-chain analysis reinforces Bitcoin's perception as a riskier asset compared to gold, a view echoed by critic Peter Schiff. Market cap rankings further highlight gold’s dominance, placing first while Bitcoin ranks 12th. At press time, Bitcoin traded around $67,258 and gold at $4,536. Despite Bitcoin briefly acting as a safe haven during gold’s worst five-day drop since 1983, the market remains divided heading into Q2 2026. The key takeaway is that both assets exhibit strength under different conditions, with no consensus yet on the true safe-haven asset.

The good old debate between Gold [XAU] and Bitcoin [BTC] never seems to conclude. Earlier in March, after the U.S.-Iran escalations, Bitcoin started outperforming gold. It even climbed back to around $74,000, acting as a hedge during geopolitical tensions.

But as we move towards the end of the month and the end of the first quarter of 2026, Bitcoin is losing its charm.

Gold vs. Bitcoin: An analysis

At the time of reporting, the XAU/BTC chart was showing green candles on the 4-hour time frame, indicating that gold was performing better than Bitcoin again. At the same time, Bitcoin was struggling to stay above the important $67,000 level.

Looking back, one can see that earlier this month, the chart dropped sharply. That meant Bitcoin was doing much better than Gold. Thereafter, both assets moved sideways for a while, showing a balance between them, but now things have shifted.

However, it’s also important to note that this bounce is currently minimal and does not hint at a real trend change. That said, the RSI was also around 72, in the overbought zone, which further confirmed the sentiment.

Bitcoin-Gold correlation hits rock bottom

At press time, Bitcoin and Gold’s price correlation stood at -0.47, meaning that both assets were moving in opposite directions.

So, according to on-chain analysis, Bitcoin is still being considered a risky asset in comparison to gold.

Bitcoin’s all-time critic, Peter Schiff, echoed this sentiment, noting,

Schiff’s narrative was further supported by the asset market cap chart, which showed that Bitcoin was ranking 12th, whereas gold was at the top.

This comes as Bitcoin was trading around $67,258, and gold was priced at $4,536 at press time.

However, when you zoom out and look at the full month, Bitcoin was acting as a ‘safe haven’ when gold was witnessing its worst five-day drop since 1983.

Thus, as we move to Q2 of 2026, it remains to be seen whether the market is still divided or there is some agreement in terms of the actual ‘safe haven’ notion.

Final Summary

The Gold vs. Bitcoin debate continues to unfold, as both assets show strength at different times under different market conditions.
The negative correlation metric further confirms that both assets are not moving in the same direction.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the price correlation between Bitcoin and Gold at the time of reporting, and what does it indicate?

AThe price correlation between Bitcoin and Gold was -0.47, indicating that the two assets were moving in opposite directions.

QAccording to the article, which asset was performing better on the XAU/BTC 4-hour chart at the time of reporting?

AGold was performing better than Bitcoin, as indicated by the green candles on the XAU/BTC 4-hour chart.

QWhat did the RSI level of 72 suggest about the market sentiment for the assets discussed?

AThe RSI level of 72 was in the overbought zone, which confirmed the sentiment that the bounce was minimal and not indicative of a real trend change.

QWho is cited in the article as a major critic of Bitcoin, and what was his stance?

APeter Schiff is cited as a major critic of Bitcoin, echoing the sentiment that Bitcoin is a risky asset compared to gold and advising people to 'get out while you still can'.

QHow did Bitcoin's role as a 'safe haven' asset compare to Gold's during the worst five-day drop for gold since 1983?

ABitcoin acted as a 'safe haven' asset during gold's worst five-day drop since 1983, outperforming gold and providing a hedge during that period of market stress.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Trade XYZ Compensated After Mass Liquidation of $60 Million Positions

Cryptocurrency platform Trade XYZ has compensated traders following a technical failure on July 27, 2026, that triggered the mass liquidation of long positions valued between $57 million and $80 million. The incident, affecting approximately 960 accounts, was caused by an abnormal order on the Korean pre-market platform NXT, which disrupted the oracle system used to calculate mark prices. This led to unwarranted liquidations despite no corresponding market conditions. In response to community outcry, Trade XYZ's team conducted an internal investigation, confirmed the technical error, and announced full compensation for all affected traders. The reimbursements were issued in tokens of equivalent value. The platform also committed to auditing its systems to prevent future occurrences, emphasizing client trust as a top priority. These actions were seen by the market as a transparent and responsible step to address the infrastructure failure and partially restore the platform's reputation.

cryptonews.ruHace 1 min(s)

Trade XYZ Compensated After Mass Liquidation of $60 Million Positions

cryptonews.ruHace 1 min(s)

Pump.fun Platform Laid Off Employees Weeks Before PUMP Token Distribution

Pump.fun reportedly laid off over 40 employees in April, just weeks before they were scheduled to receive allocations of the platform's $PUMP tokens. According to an investigation by Sandmark, which accessed internal documents, the dismissals were explained by co-founder Noah Tweedale as due to the company "growing too quickly." The affected employees had signed agreements in mid-2025 stipulating they would receive their token grants by June 2026. Following the layoffs, they received severance pay based on tenure, but their unvested $PUMP allocations were canceled. One former employee allegedly lost a seven-figure dollar sum as a result, even though the token's price is currently down approximately 79% from its 2025 peak. At the time of reporting, the $PUMP token was trading at $0.002188, having risen nearly 8% in 24 hours and 21% over the past week, despite being down 26% year-over-year.

cryptonews.ruHace 2 min(s)

Pump.fun Platform Laid Off Employees Weeks Before PUMP Token Distribution

cryptonews.ruHace 2 min(s)

Did AI Actually Help Discover a Security Vulnerability in Coldcard?

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to a theft of approximately 1,128.5 BTC ($71.1 million at the time). The issue stemmed from a five-year-old firmware configuration error affecting certain Mk3, Mk4, Mk5, and Q devices. This bug caused the devices to use a weak pseudo-random number generator during seed phrase creation, reducing effective entropy to as low as 40 bits instead of the intended 128 bits. This made it computationally feasible for an attacker to brute-force seeds by comparing derived addresses with the Bitcoin blockchain. Manufacturer Coinkite issued an emergency firmware patch and advised affected users to generate a new seed using the fixed software and transfer their funds. Coinkite's CEO suggested that AI code analysis tools might have been used to discover this long-hidden vulnerability, highlighting a new paradigm in security auditing. However, critics emphasized that the root cause was a human engineering error that traditional code reviews could have caught. The incident underscores the challenges of open-source security, where visibility does not guarantee timely discovery of subtle flaws.

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

Did AI Actually Help Discover a Security Vulnerability in Coldcard?

cryptonews.ruHace 7 min(s)

Sygnum's B2B Bank Model Fuels Cryptocurrency Boom in Switzerland

Swiss digital asset bank Sygnum's B2B model is enabling a cryptocurrency boom in Switzerland by providing integrated infrastructure to traditional banks. Its partnership with Bancastato, a regional bank, allows clients to seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Solana directly within their existing bank apps. This eliminates the friction of using separate platforms. Under this model, Sygnum handles the backend trading infrastructure, custody, compliance, and regulatory licenses, while partner banks maintain their customer relationships and branding. This "infrastructure-as-a-service" approach allows banks to offer crypto services faster and more safely than building them in-house. Over 25 Swiss financial institutions, including Zuger Kantonalbank and PostFinance, now use Sygnum's B2B platform, making regulated digital asset services accessible to over a third of Switzerland's population. The trend reflects a shift where Swiss banks view crypto as another mainstream asset class rather than a niche product. Sygnum, a licensed bank itself with operations in Zurich, Singapore, and Abu Dhabi, leverages Switzerland's mature regulatory framework, which has integrated crypto into existing banking supervision. This environment, along with the concentration of blockchain firms in "Crypto Valley," is helping mainstream cryptocurrency adoption in the country, with an estimated 18-23% of Swiss residents already owning crypto assets.

cryptonews.ruHace 8 min(s)

Sygnum's B2B Bank Model Fuels Cryptocurrency Boom in Switzerland

cryptonews.ruHace 8 min(s)

US Department of Justice Files Lawsuit to Recover $47,000 in Cryptocurrency in ATM Fraud Case

The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a civil forfeiture complaint seeking $47,461.73111 in USDT (Tether). Prosecutors allege the cryptocurrency was obtained through a fraud scheme where scammers tricked victims, including a Massachusetts woman, into withdrawing cash from their bank accounts and depositing it into crypto ATMs. In this case, the victim followed instructions after seeing a fake tech support pop-up, depositing funds into a Bitcoin Depot ATM. Authorities later traced a portion of the funds to a specific wallet, seized the assets, and linked the address to other victims. This action is part of a broader crackdown on crypto ATM fraud. In response to such scams, which the FBI reports cost Americans over $333 million in 2025, a bipartisan "Stop Crypto ATM Scams Act" has been introduced in Congress. The proposed bill would impose daily and initial deposit limits, mandate fraud warnings, and strengthen anti-money laundering requirements for operators. Regulatory bodies like FinCEN have also increased scrutiny of crypto kiosks. The Massachusetts case follows other recent forfeiture actions, including one targeting approximately $3.4 million in crypto linked to an investment scam and another for about $327,829 connected to a romance fraud scheme. Civil forfeiture allows the government to seize assets and, if successful, potentially return them to identified victims.

cryptonews.ruHace 11 min(s)

US Department of Justice Files Lawsuit to Recover $47,000 in Cryptocurrency in ATM Fraud Case

cryptonews.ruHace 11 min(s)

Trading

Spot