Global Long-Term Bonds Break Down: The Fiscal Illusion of the Low-Interest Era is Collapsing

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-19Actualizado a 2026-05-19

Resumen

Global long-term bonds are experiencing a widespread breakdown, as the fiscal illusion of the low-interest-rate era collapses. Sovereign yields are hitting multi-year highs in the US, UK, Japan, and France, signaling a market repricing driven by a common reality: unsustainable debt and deficits outpacing economic growth, compounded by renewed inflationary pressures from energy shocks. The direct trigger is the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed oil prices higher and reignited inflation fears. This squeezes central bank policy space, with expectations shifting from future rate cuts to potential hikes. The core "fiscal Ponzi scheme" is becoming evident—governments rely on new debt to service existing obligations, but as growth lags and borrowing costs rise, investors demand higher yields. Key developments include the US 30-year yield surpassing 5% for the first time since 2007, with tepid auction demand; Japan's 30-year yield reaching 4%, threatening its long-standing low-rate financial system; and political paralysis in the UK and France making meaningful fiscal consolidation unlikely. The marginal buyer for US debt is also shifting from foreign central banks to more price-sensitive private investors. While debt managers may adjust issuance, fundamental drivers—deteriorating fiscal paths, persistent inflation, and constrained central banks—remain. The market is conclusively repricing the end of the low-interest-rate financing model for highly indebted develo...

Author: Claude, Shenchao TechFlow

Shenchao Insight: Long-term bonds in developed countries are collectively faltering. The market is no longer repricing the fiscal surprise of a single country, but rather the reality of high debt, high deficits, and even higher interest rates coexisting in the long term. As debt growth persistently outpaces economic growth, energy shocks rekindle inflation, and central banks' room for rate cuts is compressed, the "low-interest rollover model" that has supported developed countries' financing for over a decade is developing cracks.

Over the past week, the yield on the UK 30-year government bond rose to 5.82%, the highest since 1998; Japan's 30-year government bond yield hit 4%, a record high since its inception in 1999; the US 30-year Treasury yield surpassed 5% for the first time since 2007; France's 10-year bond yield climbed above 3.8%, also returning to levels last seen in 2007. This sell-off has already weighed on global stock markets, prompting G7 finance ministers to specifically discuss this bond rout at their meeting this week.

According to a report dated May 18 by Ajay Rajadhyaksha, head of Fixed Income, FX, and Commodities Research at Barclays, "Long bonds didn't just sell off last week, they broke out of ranges everywhere." The core judgment is that with debt growing faster than the economy, inflation paths worsening, and no political will for fiscal reform, there is insufficient reason to extend duration even as long bonds have already sold off.

Priya Misra, Portfolio Manager at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, issued a similar warning: "Rates are rising in unison across the long end of the globe, and they tend to reinforce each other, and expectations of Fed rate hikes are now entering the market narrative."

Multi-Country Bond Markets Break Down Simultaneously, Collective "Fiscal Ponzi Scheme" Comes to Light

A decline in a single country's bond market can often be attributed to local inflation, fiscal policies, politics, or central bank communication. However, the near-simultaneous breakdowns in the UK, Japan, the US, and France indicate the market is now trading more than just local risks.

The commonality is clear: major developed economies generally have debt-to-GDP ratios above 100%, and fiscal deficits are not covered by nominal growth. The US deficit is approximately $2 trillion, about 6.5% of GDP, with nominal growth around 4.5% to 5%; France's nominal GDP grew 2.2% year-on-year for the quarter ending March 2026, with a deficit around 5%; the UK's deficit exceeds 4%.

This is the core contradiction pointed to by the "fiscal Ponzi scheme": governments continuously rely on new debt and rollover financing to sustain spending, but the pace of debt expansion exceeds economic growth, while interest costs are becoming more expensive again. As long as this combination persists, long-term bonds require higher yields to attract buyers.

New spending is adding further pressure. NATO agreed in The Hague last year to raise its defense spending target to 5% of GDP by 2035; European defense spending already grew by double-digit percentages last year and may continue for a decade; the US government is requesting a $1.5 trillion defense budget for the next fiscal year. These expenditures lack corresponding offsetting cuts.

Strait of Hormuz Blockade, Oil Price Shock Reignites Inflation

Debt and deficits were already fragile; an energy price shock is further tightening the policy space. The blockade of the Strait of Hormuz is the direct trigger for this bond market turmoil. The disruption of the world's most crucial oil shipping chokepoint has continuously pushed oil prices higher, reigniting inflation expectations.

Barclays' base case assumes Brent crude will average $100 in 2026, a 50% increase from the 2025 average. This would directly worsen the inflation outlook, compress central banks' room for rate cuts, and could even force them to hike rates. Higher rates mean existing debt interest payments will continue to rise, which in turn makes reducing deficits even more difficult. This resembles a fiscal ratchet mechanism—with each forward turn, the government's maneuvering room shrinks, and bond investors demand greater compensation.

J.P. Morgan Managing Director Priya Misra stated bluntly: "Unless the strait reopens, the rate range has shifted higher overall."

Looking at short-term data, the US 2-year yield briefly rose to 4.09%, the highest since February 2025; the 10-year yield stood at 4.58%, near a one-year high; US Treasuries overall have recorded negative returns year-to-date, whereas gains were nearly 2% as of late February.

Inflation Narrative Dominates the Market, Term Premium Being Repriced

The judgment from Karen Manna, Fixed Income Strategist and Portfolio Manager at Federated Hermes, is: "We are seeing a world that is truly dealing with a new inflation wave."

Kevin Flanagan, Head of Investment Strategy at WisdomTree, anticipates the next Consumer Price Index report may show annual inflation reaching 4%, the highest level since 2023. He directly points out the market logic: "The inflation narrative is dominating the market. The bond market is demanding a higher premium to hold newly issued Treasuries."

Last week's Treasury auctions confirmed this pricing: The 30-year auction rate hit 5%, the first since 2007, but demand was tepid; investor demand for the 3-year and 10-year auctions was also lukewarm. Even the rise in long-term bond yields to year-to-date highs is not, in itself, a sufficient reason to add duration.

Fed Path Completely Reverses, Bets Shift from Two Cuts to a March Hike

The inflation storm is reshaping expectations for the Federal Reserve's policy path. The environment facing incoming Fed Chairman Kevin Warsh is far from the "easing channel" envisioned by the market at the start of the year.

Traders now see a March hike next year as highly probable, with the odds of a hike by December around three-quarters; back at the end of February, the market was expecting two rate cuts in 2026. US Treasury yields are now about 50 basis points or more higher than their late-February levels.

Official commentary has further cemented hawkish pricing. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee said last week that broad price pressures might even signal an overheating economy; Fed Governor Michael Barr called inflation the "overwhelming" risk facing the economy. The Fed's April meeting minutes will be released this Wednesday, and the market will closely watch how much support dissenting members garnered among officials.

The latest J.P. Morgan US Treasury Client Survey shows net short positions on Treasuries have risen to their highest level in 13 weeks, indicating a clear increase in market bets for further bond market declines.

Japan's Low-Rate System Being Repriced

Japan's 30-year government bond yield touching 4% may not be extreme in the US or UK, but it holds different significance for the Japanese market. For the past 20 years, Japan's long-term interest rates have hovered near zero, and the balance sheet structures of pension funds, insurance companies, and regional banks were built around this environment.

The Bank of Japan's policy rate is currently 0.75%. At the April policy meeting, three out of nine board members opposed the current stance; market pricing shows a 77% probability of a June rate hike. Even if the BOJ raises rates to 1%, real rates would remain significantly negative.

The rise in Japan's long-term yields can be interpreted as monetary policy normalization: the end of deflation, real wage growth, and the economy returning to a more normal state. However, the issue is that normalization may not be gentle for an economy with debt exceeding twice its GDP. A 4% yield on a 30-year Japanese bond is not just a change in a yield figure; it signifies the repricing of the entire low-interest-rate financial system.

UK, France: Political Structures Make Deficit Reduction Almost Impossible

The UK Labour government has a working majority of over 150 seats in the 650-seat parliament, theoretically possessing the capacity for fiscal adjustment. However, last summer, proposed savings of just £1.4 billion related to winter fuel subsidies sparked a backlash within the Labour parliamentary party.

Political pressure is mounting. Ninety-seven Labour MPs have demanded the Prime Minister resign or provide a departure timeline; main challenger Andy Burnham once argued fiscal policy should not submit to the bond market, later clarifying he would not completely ignore investors. The UK has had four prime ministers and five chancellors of the exchequer in the past four years. Bond market pricing indicates over 60 basis points of further rate hike potential for the Bank of England by year-end, although Governor Bailey may prefer to wait and see.

France's problem is less eye-catching than UK gilts, but its fiscal structure is equally tricky. France has had five prime ministers in less than three years. The current government has survived two no-confidence votes to push through a budget targeting a 5% of GDP deficit. The 2023 reform raising the retirement age to 64 is under attack, even though 64 is still below most Western economies. France's deficit is already significantly higher than its nominal GDP growth, voters will harshly punish austerity attempts, and constitutional arrangements make it easier for parliament to block spending cuts. Everyone knows the deficit must fall, but no one is willing to bear the political cost of reducing it.

US Buyer Structure Has Changed: Foreign Central Banks Turn to Gold, Private Investors Demand Higher Prices

The US 30-year Treasury yield surpassing 5% is the first time since 2007. The direct causes are rising inflation, fiscal expansion, and high deficits, but this is not new. The deeper change lies in the shifting marginal buyers.

The US federal deficit is approximately $2 trillion. The Congressional Budget Office projects that federal debt held by the public will rise from its current level of over 100% of GDP to 120% by 2036. However, this forecast may still be optimistic. A key variable is tariff revenue: The US effective tariff rate has fallen from a peak of 12% to between 7% and 8%, below the CBO's assumption of 15%. Even if it eventually rises to 10%, tariff revenue over the next decade would only be about 60% of the roughly $3 trillion deficit reduction assumed in its projections. Assumptions for defense spending and interest costs may also be too low.

The dollar's reserve currency status remains a structural advantage for the US, allowing it to finance at rates that peer debtors struggle to obtain. However, this does not mean a 6.5% deficit ratio is sustainable. Foreign central banks were once stable buyers of duration assets, but since the West froze Russia's foreign reserves, central bank allocations have shifted towards gold. Last year, gold's share in central bank reserves surpassed that of US Treasuries. Japan, the largest holder of US Treasuries, finds its domestic market rates more attractive. The Fed is still in quantitative tightening mode. Those stepping in to buy long-term bonds are price-sensitive private investors demanding higher term premiums.

The Fed is Not a "Fuse" for Long Bonds

Debt management offices have relatively reduced long-term bond issuance in recent years and may continue adjusting issuance structures, but this can only ease supply pressure, not change the fiscal and inflation direction.

Some in the market discuss whether the Fed might be forced to restart large-scale asset purchases to prevent long-end rates from rising further. However, Warsh's previous statement regarding the Fed's balance sheet was, "A bloated balance sheet could be meaningfully reduced," which is not language suggesting preparation for a US version of Yield Curve Control.

Faced with the ongoing sell-off, some investors choose to stay on the sidelines. WisdomTree analyst Kevin Flanagan said he currently maintains holdings in floating rate notes and keeps interest rate exposure low, "preferring to buy later rather than too early." He views the 4.5% level on the 10-year yield as "more of a psychological barrier," and if Middle East tensions escalate again and push oil prices higher, yields could retest last year's high of 4.62%. Hank Smith, Head of Investment Strategy at Haverford Trust, holds a more cautious view, stating that it remains an unresolved question whether the rise in consumer and producer prices is temporary "or will persist into 2027."

The forces driving the sell-off—fiscal deterioration, increased defense spending, sticky inflation, and constrained central banks—are not disappearing in a week or two. Unless economic data weakens significantly or credible changes emerge in fiscal paths, developed market long bonds are still trading on the same issue: the low-interest financing model of the high-debt era is being repriced by the market.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core reason for the simultaneous sell-off in long-term bonds across major developed economies like the US, UK, Japan, and France, according to the article?

AThe article argues the core reason is a market reassessment of the 'low-interest-rate rolling model' due to a common reality of high debt, high deficits, and persistent higher interest rates. Key drivers are debt growing faster than economic growth, energy shocks reigniting inflation, and central banks having less room to cut rates, which forces markets to demand higher yields to compensate.

QHow did the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz contribute to the bond market turmoil described in the article?

AThe blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil transit route, pushed oil prices higher, reigniting inflation expectations. This energy price shock further compressed the policy space for central banks, potentially forcing them to raise rates. Higher interest rates increase government debt servicing costs, widening deficits and forcing bond investors to demand even higher yields, creating a vicious cycle.

QWhat significant shift has occurred in the market's expectation for Federal Reserve policy, as mentioned in the text?

AThe market's expectation for the Federal Reserve's policy path has completely reversed. At the end of February, the market anticipated two rate cuts in 2026. Now, traders view a rate hike in March of the coming year as highly likely, with about a 75% probability of a hike by December. This shift is driven by renewed and persistent inflation pressures.

QWhy is Japan's 30-year government bond yield reaching 4% considered particularly significant, despite being lower than similar yields in the US or UK?

AA 4% yield for Japan's 30-year bond is highly significant because Japan's financial system has been built around near-zero interest rates for over two decades. Pensions, insurers, and regional banks structured their balance sheets based on this environment. Therefore, this rise represents a fundamental repricing of Japan's entire low-interest-rate financial architecture, which is challenging for an economy with debt exceeding 200% of GDP.

QAccording to the article, what are the two key changes in the buyer structure for US Treasury bonds that are contributing to higher long-term yields?

ATwo key changes in the US Treasury buyer structure are: 1) Foreign central banks, traditional stable buyers of duration, are shifting reserves towards gold and away from US Treasuries, partly due to geopolitical factors like the freezing of Russian reserves. 2) The marginal buyers are now more price-sensitive private investors who demand higher term premiums (compensation for holding long-term debt), as opposed to less price-sensitive official buyers. The Fed is also reducing its balance sheet (quantitative tightening).

Lecturas Relacionadas

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

On his first day in office, newly inaugurated Federal Reserve Chairman Warsh received a stark market warning, with expectations now fully pricing in a 25-basis-point interest rate hike this year. The shift was triggered by hawkish remarks from Fed Governor Waller, who stated that inflation is now the key policy "driver" and that the odds of a hike or cut are evenly split. This sent short-term Treasury yields higher. Waller signaled a significant pivot in his stance, citing disappointing inflation and labor data. He suggested removing "easing bias" language from Fed statements and did not rule out future rate increases if inflation fails to recede, though he noted immediate action isn't warranted without signs of unanchored inflation expectations. Chairman Warsh faces immediate pressure at his first FOMC meeting in June. With the preferred inflation gauge at a three-year high, analysts warn that failing to hike could be interpreted as an implicit easing of policy. The geopolitical situation in the Middle East is adding to existing price pressures. The market's expectation for a hike contrasts sharply with earlier forecasts for multiple cuts. While long-term Treasury yields have been contained by lower energy prices recently, analysts note they remain under structural upward pressure. Warsh's swearing-in at the White House highlights political scrutiny over Fed independence. However, the market has made it clear that inflation is the most urgent challenge, leaving the new chairman little time to settle in.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

Microsoft, once seen as an early AI frontrunner due to its investment in OpenAI, is navigating a strategic shift amid increased competition. Its initial reliance on OpenAI’s GPT models has been complicated by OpenAI’s growing ambitions as a direct competitor, rapid advancements from rivals like Claude and Gemini, and the disruptive rise of AI agents, which challenge its traditional SaaS business model. These factors contributed to stock declines and slower-than-expected adoption of its flagship Copilot products. In response, CEO Satya Nadella has taken a hands-on role in product development, signaling the urgency of change. Microsoft is pivoting from a model-centric strategy to a "model-agnostic" enterprise platform approach. It aims to become the foundational layer connecting various AI models—from OpenAI, Anthropic, or its own new "Superintelligence" team—with enterprise workflows, data, security, and cloud services. Recent organizational changes merged consumer and enterprise Copilot teams to accelerate innovation, exemplified by new products like Copilot Tasks and Copilot Cowork. However, this transformation comes at a high cost. Microsoft faces massive capital expenditures, potentially reaching ~$190 billion by 2026, to support AI infrastructure. While its platform strategy shows early signs of traction with growing Azure AI revenue, it must balance startup-like agility with the reliability expected by enterprise clients. The core challenge is no longer being the sole AI winner but defending its position as the essential enterprise software entry point amidst rapid technological commoditization and the shift towards always-on AI agents.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手Hace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar ERA

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Caldera (ERA) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Caldera (ERA) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Caldera (ERA)Después de comprar tu Caldera (ERA), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Caldera (ERA)Tradear fácilmente con Caldera (ERA) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

357 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.07.17Actualizado en 2025.07.17

Cómo comprar ERA

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de ERA (ERA).

活动图片