Full Text of the Fed Decision: 25 Basis Point Rate Cut, $40 Billion Treasury Bill Purchases Within 30 Days

比推Publicado a 2025-12-10Actualizado a 2025-12-10

Resumen

The Federal Reserve lowered the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 3.50%-3.75% on December 10, 2025, marking the third consecutive rate cut. The decision was approved by a 9-3 vote. The policy statement removed the description of unemployment as "low," and the latest dot plot maintained the projection of an additional 25 basis point rate cut in 2026. Additionally, the Fed will purchase $40 billion in Treasury bills over 30 days starting December 12 to maintain ample reserve levels. The policy stance reflects concerns over moderating economic activity, a rise in unemployment, and inflation that remains elevated. The committee emphasized its commitment to achieving maximum employment and a 2% inflation target, noting increased downside risks to employment. Voting against the decision were Stephen Miran, who preferred a 50 basis point cut, and Austan Goolsbee and Jeffrey Schmid, who favored no change. The Board also unanimously approved a reduction in the primary credit rate to 3.75%.

On December 10, 2025, local time, the Federal Reserve lowered the benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to 3.50%-3.75% in a 9-3 vote, marking the third consecutive meeting with a rate cut. The policy statement removed the description of the unemployment rate as "low." The latest dot plot maintains the forecast of a 25 basis point rate cut in 2026.

Additionally, the Federal Reserve will purchase $40 billion in Treasury bills within 30 days starting December 12 to maintain ample reserve supply.

Full Text of the Interest Rate Decision

Available data indicate that economic activity is expanding at a moderate pace. Job growth has slowed this year, and the unemployment rate has risen as of September. More recent indicators are consistent with this situation. Inflation has increased compared to the beginning of the year and remains elevated.

The Committee's long-term goals are to achieve maximum employment and 2% inflation. Uncertainty about the economic outlook remains high. The Committee is closely monitoring risks on both sides of its dual mandate and believes that downside risks in employment have increased in recent months.

To support these goals and considering changes in the risk balance, the Committee decided to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to 3.50% to 3.75%. In assessing the appropriate timing and magnitude of any further adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate, the Committee will carefully evaluate incoming data, the evolving economic outlook, and the balance of risks. The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2% target.

In evaluating the appropriate monetary policy stance, the Committee will continue to monitor the implications of incoming information for the economic outlook. The Committee would be prepared to adjust the stance of monetary policy as appropriate if risks emerge that could impede the attainment of the Committee's goals. The Committee's assessments will take into account a wide range of information, including labor market conditions, inflationary pressures and inflation expectations, and financial and international developments.

The Committee believes that reserve balances have declined to ample levels and will initiate purchases of short-term U.S. Treasury securities as needed to maintain ample reserve supply on an ongoing basis.

Voting in favor of this monetary policy action were: Chair Jerome H. Powell, Vice Chair John C. Williams, Michael S. Barr, Michelle W. Bowman, Susan M. Collins, Lisa D. Cook, Philip N. Jefferson, Alberto G. Musalem, and Christopher J. Waller. Voting against were Stephen I. Miran, who preferred to lower the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/2 percentage point at this meeting; and Austan D. Goolsbee and Jeffrey R. Schmid, who preferred to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate unchanged at this meeting.

Median Fed Dot Plot: Cumulative 25 Basis Point Rate Cut in 2026

Decisions Regarding Monetary Policy Operations

To implement the monetary policy stance announced in the Federal Open Market Committee's statement on December 10, 2025, the Federal Reserve makes the following decisions:

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System unanimously voted to lower the interest rate on reserve balances to 3.65%, effective December 11, 2025.

As part of the policy decision, the Federal Open Market Committee voted to direct the Open Market Trading Desk at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, until further notice, to execute transactions in the System Open Market Account in accordance with the following domestic policy directive:

"Effective December 11, 2025, the Federal Open Market Committee directs the Desk:

To conduct open market operations as necessary to maintain the federal funds rate in a target range of 3.50% to 3.75%.

To conduct standing overnight repurchase agreement operations at an offering rate of 3.75%.

To conduct standing overnight reverse repurchase agreement operations at an offering rate of 3.50%, with a per-counterparty limit of $160 billion per day.

To increase the System Open Market Account's holdings of securities by purchasing Treasury bills and, if necessary, other U.S. Treasury securities with remaining maturities of three years or less, to maintain ample levels of reserves.

To reinvest all principal payments from the Federal Reserve's holdings of U.S. Treasury securities at auction. To roll over all principal payments from the Federal Reserve's holdings of agency securities into Treasury bills."

In related actions, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System unanimously voted to approve a 25 basis point reduction in the primary credit rate to 3.75%, effective December 11, 2025. In taking this action, the Board approved requests submitted by the Boards of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks of New York, Philadelphia, St. Louis, and San Francisco to set this rate.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594706

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the new target range for the Federal Funds Rate after the December 10, 2025, Fed decision?

AThe new target range for the Federal Funds Rate is 3.50% to 3.75%.

QHow many members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted against the policy action, and what were their preferred actions?

AThree members voted against the policy action. Stephen I. Miran preferred to lower the target range by 1/2 percentage point, while Austan D. Goolsbee and Jeffrey R. Schmid preferred to maintain the target range unchanged.

QWhat specific action did the Fed announce regarding its balance sheet and Treasury securities?

AThe Fed announced it will purchase $40 billion in Treasury bills over 30 days starting December 12 to maintain ample reserve supplies. It will also reinvest principal payments from its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and agency securities into Treasury bills.

QAccording to the latest dot plot, what is the median projection for interest rate changes in 2026?

AThe median projection from the latest dot plot is for a cumulative 25 basis point rate cut in 2026.

QWhat changes were made to the policy statement regarding the description of the labor market?

AThe policy statement removed the description of the unemployment rate as 'low'.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

The prediction market industry has grown significantly, with trading volumes exceeding $20 billion monthly by mid-2026, driven by sports, politics, and macroeconomics. Success now depends heavily on platform choice and execution logistics. This guide compares five leading networks: **Polymarket**: A high-volume, decentralized platform on Polygon, using USDC for international and crypto-native users. It offers diverse markets but lacks built-in risk tools. **Kalshi**: A CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange for institutional traders, using direct fiat. It leads in regulated volume, especially for major sports and economic events, but has limited contract listings. **Outpoll**: A CeDeFi platform for advanced traders, focusing on professional tools. It uniquely features built-in stop-loss/take-profit orders, 0.1% fees, and full API support, with settlement in USDC. **OG Predictive**: A CFTC-regulated, sports-focused platform from Crypto.com. It offers granular player props and a flat fee structure, appealing to long-term position traders. **Manifold Markets**: A play-money, no-KYC platform for casual users and developers. It allows user-generated markets on any topic with zero fees, serving as a sandbox for strategy testing. Key differentiators include regulatory models (regulated vs. decentralized), funding (fiat vs. crypto), order types, risk management features, API access, and mobile support. The conclusion emphasizes that in today's event trading, profitability hinges not just on accurate predictions but on optimizing execution through platform infrastructure, liquidity, fees, and risk tools.

TheNewsCryptoHace 9 min(s)

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

TheNewsCryptoHace 9 min(s)

Why Are Large-Scale Crypto Conferences No Longer Glamorous?

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Allure? A growing sense of fatigue surrounds large in-person crypto conferences, with many founders and investors now avoiding events they would never have missed just two years ago. While complaints cite declining ROI and information quality, the root causes are more structural. Crypto, global from inception, once relied on these mega-conferences as neutral hubs for essential face-to-face connections. However, their core value has been fragmented. High-quality participants—developers, investors—have largely migrated to smaller, private side-events, leaving main stages for repetitive content already shared online. The main conference often just becomes the excuse for being in the same city, with attendees scrambling between exclusive dinners and micro-events. While these intimate gatherings offer signal-rich conversations, they lose the "serendipitous encounters" of large conferences and can create insular echo chambers, especially as talent concentrates in hubs like New York. Meanwhile, invite-only, high-caliber summits are rising, offering quality and scale but at the cost of accessibility and crypto's early egalitarian ethos. This shift isn't unique to crypto; AI events in San Francisco show a similar trend. The perception of higher-value interactions drives core groups towards smaller, private settings, potentially creating a vicious cycle that drains larger events of their vitality. Yet, a more optimistic view exists. The apparent decline of crypto-centric events may signal industry maturation. Leading projects are now focused outward—on stablecoins for traditional finance, consumer-facing digital banks, or real-world assets. Crypto topics are increasingly integrated into mainstream finance and tech conferences. Just as dedicated "internet conferences" faded, dedicated crypto summits may become redundant as the technology embeds into every sector. The future likely holds far fewer large, inward-looking crypto conferences. The industry has moved past needing frequent self-congratulatory gatherings. True growth lies in engaging with the broader economy. This evolution towards private networking and mainstream integration, for better or worse, is a mark of the industry coming of age.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Why Are Large-Scale Crypto Conferences No Longer Glamorous?

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

Coin & Stock Compass: Global Listed Companies Net Sold $85.45 Million in BTC Last Week, Strategy's Dollar Reserves Scale Up to $3 Billion (July 14)

Global Public Companies Net Sell $85.45 Million in BTC; Strategy's Dollar Reserves Hit $3 Billion (July 14) Last week saw a significant net sell-off of Bitcoin by global public companies, excluding miners, totaling $85.45 million—a 908.42% decrease from the prior week. Major buyers like Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) and Japan's Metaplanet were notably absent from the market. However, two companies, Brazil's OrangeBTC and asset manager Strive, made purchases, adding 8 and 18 BTC, respectively. The aggregate BTC holdings of tracked public companies now stand at 1,139,635 BTC, valued at approximately $71.38 billion and representing 5.7% of Bitcoin's circulating market cap. In corporate updates, Strategy announced its dollar reserves have grown by $450 million to reach $3 billion, while its BTC holdings remain at 843,775 coins. Hyperscale Data increased its BTC reserves past 1,000 coins. Strategy will report its Q2 2026 financial results on July 30. Mining firm Cleanspark added 454 BTC, bringing its total to 13,924 BTC. Conversely, BitFuFu sold 184 BTC, Bitdeer maintained zero net BTC holdings after selling its weekly production, and Empery Digital sold 1,400 BTC to fund an AI data center project and repay debt. Overall, public companies purchased 110,000 BTC in Q2 2026, 1.8 times the volume of the previous two quarters combined. In other cryptocurrency-related corporate news, Ethereum treasury company Bitmine increased its ETH holdings by 27,801 coins, with total staked ETH exceeding 4.9 million. Solana-focused company DFDV transferred daily operations of its meme coin DONT to an independent team. BNB treasury company BNB Plus was delisted from Nasdaq for failing to meet the $1 minimum bid price and moved to trade on the OTCQB market under the symbol BNBX. The broader equity markets showed mixed signals. Bank of America warned that bullish investor positioning indicated a potential pullback risk for stocks. In contrast, Morgan Stanley predicted the ongoing earnings season could broaden market gains beyond tech giants. Specific regional highlights included continued foreign investor outflows from South Korean stocks, pressure on US equities, and the upcoming IPO of Chinese memory chip maker ChangXin Memory. Most crypto-linked stocks remained in a downtrend.

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Coin & Stock Compass: Global Listed Companies Net Sold $85.45 Million in BTC Last Week, Strategy's Dollar Reserves Scale Up to $3 Billion (July 14)

marsbitHace 34 min(s)

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Luster?

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Appeal? A growing sense of fatigue surrounds large-scale offline crypto conferences. Participants complain of declining returns and less substantial information, but the root cause is deeper. Initially, these global summits were vital for a decentralized industry without a physical hub, enabling crucial face-to-face connections. However, the value of large main-stage events has been eroded. High-quality developers and investors have migrated to exclusive, invitation-only side events and private dinners. While these offer focused networking, they lose the "serendipitous encounters" of larger gatherings and can create elitist barriers, contradicting crypto's open ethos. This fragmentation triggers a vicious cycle: as key people leave main events, their value diminishes further. Simultaneously, the industry's focus is shifting outward. Leading crypto firms are now engaging with traditional finance and real-world applications like stablecoins, digital banking, and prediction markets. Consequently, crypto-specific topics are increasingly integrated into mainstream financial conferences, making dedicated crypto summits potentially redundant. Looking ahead, the frequency of top-tier crypto conferences will likely decrease significantly. The industry has moved past its inward-looking phase. The migration of quality discourse to private settings and the push for mainstream adoption, while diluting the large conference model, are ultimately signs of the sector's maturation.

Foresight NewsHace 46 min(s)

Why Are Major Crypto Conferences Losing Their Luster?

Foresight NewsHace 46 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片