From Power Infrastructure to Token Economy: The 'Seven-Layer Cake' of the AI Industry Chain

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-26Actualizado a 2026-05-26

Resumen

From Power Grid to Token Economy: The AI Industry's "Seven-Layer Cake" The AI industry is shifting from a "model-centric" paradigm focused on massive training to a "token-centric" industrial era driven by inference demand. This new phase revolves around the production, distribution, scheduling, and consumption of tokens—the units of computation used by AI agents for every interaction and task. The article proposes a "seven-layer cake" framework for the AI economy: 1. **Power**: The foundational energy source, with competition shifting to securing stable, low-cost electricity. 2. **AIDC (AI Data Centers)**: Large-scale "Token factories." A trend toward smaller, modular, and regionally deployed AI Factories is emerging for efficiency and proximity to users. 3. **GPU**: The core production hardware for tokens. While NVIDIA dominates, competition exists from AMD, ASIC makers, and Chinese chipmakers, with a growing focus on inference efficiency. 4. **LLMs**: The "engines" that generate tokens. The competition is evolving beyond model size to prioritize factors like token cost, inference efficiency, and operational synergy with infrastructure. 5. **Token Distribution**: The "grid" that allocates and rents out compute resources, led by cloud giants and specialized AI-native platforms. 6. **Token Optimization & Intelligent Scheduling**: The critical "brain" layer that intelligently routes tasks (e.g., to local, cloud, or edge models) for optimal cost, latency, and privacy—ma...

Over the past two years, the narrative logic of the AI industry's first half primarily revolved around the 'large model war' initiated by major tech giants. Model parameters progressed from hundreds of billions to trillions, training costs rose from tens of millions to hundreds of millions of US dollars, and GPU clusters expanded from thousands to tens of thousands of cards. Everyone discussed whose model was more powerful, who was closer to AGI, as if the endpoint of AI competition was determined solely by the performance metrics of the large models themselves.

By 2026, the driving logic of the AI industry has shifted. JPMorgan's latest report suggests that what will truly drive the continued expansion of AI infrastructure in the future is no longer model training, but the massive demand for AI inference. The largest consumer of computing power will no longer be just training large models, but the ubiquitous AI Agents scattered across the globe. Every call, every interaction, every task execution is essentially consuming Tokens. The AI industry is transitioning from the 'Model Era' to the 'Token Industry Era.'

Because what will truly power the future AI world is not just the models themselves, but the entire system of Token production, distribution, scheduling, and consumption that forms around them. Especially with the large-scale emergence of AI Agents, how Tokens are generated in real-time, distributed across regions, dynamically scheduled, and efficiently consumed will become the core new challenge for the entire AI industry.

As Jensen Huang recently proposed, AI is not a simple software industry but an infrastructure system akin to electricity and the internet. In his 'five-layer cake' architecture, the AI industry is divided into five structural layers: Energy, Chips, Infrastructure, Models, and Applications. As the AI industry gradually shifts from the 'Training Era' to the 'Inference Era,' GoodVision AI prefers to conceptualize the entire AI economic industrial chain as a 'seven-layer cake structure' revolving around Tokens:

First Layer: Electricity – The Energy Foundation of the AI Era
Second Layer: AIDC – The Token Factory
Third Layer: GPU – The Token Production Equipment
Fourth Layer: LLM – The Token Production Engine
Fifth Layer: Token Distribution – The 'Power Grid' of the AI Era
Sixth Layer: Token Optimization & Intelligent Scheduling – The Brain of the AI Era
Seventh Layer: AI Agent – The Token Consumption Terminal

From energy and GPUs to AIDCs, edge nodes, model inference, and intelligent scheduling, the AI industry is forming an unprecedented 'Token Industrial System.'

However, this system is still far from mature.

Some possess the most advanced GPUs but are constrained by energy supply; some have built massive AIDCs but lack efficient scheduling; some develop powerful AI Agents but face high inference costs and latency; some control edge nodes but cannot form a unified, collaborative network. Although the entire industrial chain is developing rapidly, there remains significant fragmentation, redundancy, and efficiency bottlenecks between layers.

Only when these seven layers of infrastructure are truly interconnected, coordinated, and integrated will the AI industry transition from today's 'Tool Era' to the true 'Mass Adoption Era' belonging to the intelligent world.

First Layer Cake: Electricity – The Energy of the AI Era

The Industrial Revolution competed for coal and oil, the Internet era competed for traffic and servers, and the AI era sees the most fundamental war returning to energy.

Because AI ultimately consumes electricity. The power consumption of a large AI data center is already comparable to that of a medium-sized city. Newly built AIDCs (AI Data Centers) worldwide are facing the same problem: GPUs can be purchased, land can be acquired, but power supply and grid scheduling lag behind.

This is why more and more AI companies are refocusing on energy infrastructure. At GTC 2026, Jensen Huang even defined the future data center as a 'Token Factory.' The upstream of this factory will give rise to a super energy industry.

In the Chinese market, companies like China Yangtze Power, China National Nuclear Power, CGN Power, China Three Gorges Renewables, Longyuan Power, and Huadian New Energy represent core energy directions including hydropower, nuclear power, wind power, and photovoltaics. Among these, nuclear and hydropower, with their stable supply capabilities, are becoming the most important foundational energy sources for AIDCs; while wind and solar benefit from the AI industry's demand for green power and ESG standards. With the advancement of 'East Data West Computing' and large-scale AI data center construction, the synergy between new energy bases and computing power centers is rapidly strengthening.

In the US market, traditional energy giants like NextEra Energy, Dominion Energy, Duke Energy, Southern Co., and Exelon are also benefiting from the expansion of AI data centers. Among them, NextEra is a leader in North American green power; Dominion controls core transmission resources in Northern Virginia's 'Data Center Corridor'; Exelon, with its stable nuclear power supply, is becoming a key beneficiary of the AI era's demand for 'all-weather high-stability power.' Overall, the global power industry is gradually upgrading from a traditional utility to a core resource layer in the AI infrastructure era.

Overall, the competitive landscape at this layer is shifting from the traditional 'electricity price competition' among energy companies to a 'power locking right competition' between downstream AI data centers, cloud providers, and energy companies. Whoever can secure long-term, stable, low-cost energy holds the first dragon ball for Token production.

Second Layer Cake: AIDC – The Raw Token Factory

A single GPU is meaningless; what truly matters is the scaled cluster. Hence, the emergence of the AIDC.

It is like the steel mills, power plants, and assembly line factories of the industrial era, concentrating thousands of GPUs to form stable Token production capacity. But factory problems are also emerging: traditional AIDC construction cycles often last 18 to 36 months, with grid expansion taking even longer. When AI demand grows exponentially, the construction speed of the old-era IDC can no longer meet the needs of the new Token economy.

In the US stock market, Equinix is one of the world's leading data center operators, with over 240 data centers in more than 30 countries. Its core advantage is not just the number of facilities but its global interconnectivity and low-latency network resources, making it a crucial infrastructure node for AI compute deployment.

Digital Realty, through its PlatformDIGITAL, enters the AI infrastructure market, serving large cloud service providers and financial institutions.

In the Chinese market, Runtze Technology is one of the most typical AIDC operators listed on the A-share market. Its core business has gradually upgraded from traditional IDC to AI computing centers, with core competencies lying in large-scale facilities, power resources, and AIDC operational capabilities. Companies like OFFLINE Data and Beijing Sinnet Technology Group are expanding in areas such as regional data centers, cloud infrastructure, and AI compute hosting. Sugon leans more towards government, enterprise, and research collaborations in its AIDC business.

Another category of players comes from 'mining farm transformations.' Companies like CoreWeave, IREN, Applied Digital, and Cipher Mining were originally related to cryptocurrency mining. However, with the explosive demand for AI GPUs, they have rapidly pivoted to AI compute infrastructure. IREN promotes a 'Green Power + AI Compute' model, building high-density GPU data centers using renewable energy. Applied Digital and Cipher Mining are also transitioning from traditional mining farms to high-performance AI computing infrastructure.

Furthermore, decentralized, smaller-scale, modular AI Factories are becoming a new trend. Just as the internet era moved from mainframes to cloud computing, AI compute needs to diffuse from super-large central nodes to regional edge nodes.

Therefore, GoodVision AI has chosen a different path: building more lightweight, modular, and rapidly replicable AI Factories. Compared to traditional large-scale AIDCs, GoodVision AI emphasizes regional deployment capability, high-density GPU cluster efficiency, and integrated synergy between energy and compute power.

Its core logic is not to build a single mega data center, but to rapidly deploy AI Factory nodes in high-density population areas globally, typically small-scale inference compute facilities of 2-4MW. This model not only allows for quicker access to local energy resources but is also more suitable for the trend of future AI inference demand spreading to the edge.

If traditional AIDCs resemble the large steel mills of the industrial era, then what GoodVision AI is building is more akin to the 'regionalized Token factories' of the AI era – lighter, more flexible, closer to users, and better suited for the development direction of a future globally distributed inference network.

Third Layer Cake: GPU – The Token Production Equipment

If electricity is the energy, then the GPU is the production equipment. In the initial years of the AI boom, GPUs primarily served training; but in the future, the larger demand will come from inference. Because training belongs to only a few leading companies, while inference will permeate every application, every device, every terminal. Robots need inference, autonomous driving needs inference, AI glasses need inference, and even future collaboration between every AI Agent consumes Tokens in real-time.

NVIDIA remains the absolute core of the global AI chip industry. Its H100, B200, Blackwell, and other GPU products almost define the current global standards for AI training and inference. More importantly, NVIDIA doesn't just sell chips; it has built a complete ecosystem through software and hardware systems like CUDA, TensorRT, DGX, and HGX. Therefore, its competitors must challenge not only GPU performance but the entire AI software ecosystem.

AMD is currently the primary GPU challenger, with core products including the MI300X and other AI GPUs. Compared to NVIDIA, AMD emphasizes an open ecosystem and the ROCm software platform, hoping to attract AI developers and enterprise customers through a more open approach.

Broadcom and Marvell represent another route – ASIC and high-speed interconnects. As AI inference scenarios become increasingly complex, more companies are experimenting with custom ASIC chips to achieve higher energy efficiency and lower costs.

Intel is entering the AI market through server CPUs and Gaudi AI accelerators, hoping to leverage its CPU ecosystem to re-engage in AI infrastructure competition.

In the Chinese market, Cambricon is one of the most representative domestic AI chip companies, primarily promoting its Siyuan series AI chips and building its self-developed AI framework, Neuware. Hygon Information has AMD Zen architecture licensing, focusing on DCU and the AI inference market.

Domestic GPU companies like Moore Threads, Enflame Technology, MetaX, and Biren Technology represent the direction of 'domestic substitution' for Chinese AI chips. They generally emphasize compatibility with the CUDA ecosystem while attempting to build domestic GPU clusters.

From the CUDA ecosystem to HBM memory to Tensor Cores, the core of the entire AI industry is actually continuously improving 'the efficiency of Token generation per unit time.' Simultaneously, GPUs and their underlying infrastructure—servers, optical modules, liquid cooling, switches, etc.—are also closely related to Token production efficiency.

These elements are not as dazzling as companies like NVIDIA, OpenAI, or AI application developers, but they determine whether the entire AI world can truly function. Just as the Industrial Revolution needed not only steam engines but also railways, power grids, and ports. The AI Revolution will not be just a software revolution. It is a global industrial chain upgrade covering energy, chips, networks, cloud computing, and infrastructure.

Vertiv is a global leader in data center UPS and power management, providing data center power supply, cabinet power distribution, and precision air conditioning systems.

Envicool is the A-share market leader in liquid cooling and temperature control systems, with clients including BAT and other large internet companies. As GPU power consumption increases, liquid cooling is becoming a crucial standard feature for AIDCs.

Companies like Hangzhou Zhongheng Electric, Kehua Data, and KSTAR have important positions in UPS, power supply systems, and IDC power provision.</p

In the network and optical module sector, companies like Zhongji Innolight, Eoptolink Technology, and TFC Optical Communication benefit from the surging demand for high-speed communication within AI clusters.

In the server OEM direction, companies like Dell, HPE, Supermicro, Lenovo, and Inspur Information are responsible for the large-scale assembly and delivery of AI servers.

This layer, though not directly facing end-users, determines whether AI infrastructure can truly operate stably. Liquid cooling, UPS, optical modules, switches, energy storage, and server OEMs are becoming the true 'pickaxe sellers' of the AI world, just like the railways, power grids, and ports of the industrial era.

Fourth Layer Cake: LLM – The Token Production Engine

LLMs (Large Language Models) determine how Tokens are understood, generated, and organized. Over the past two years, companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, xAI, and DeepSeek have ignited a global 'large model competition.' Parameters have scaled from hundreds of billions to trillions, and model capabilities have expanded from text generation to multimodal, reasoning, coding, Agent collaboration, and long-term memory.

However, as the industry develops, the market is beginning to realize: what will truly matter in the future is no longer just 'who has the largest model,' but who can run models continuously at lower costs and higher efficiency. Because the model itself does not directly create value; the real value is created through the inference process of the model being called repeatedly.

This also means that LLMs are evolving from their past role of 'showcasing model capabilities' to becoming the 'Token production engines' in the AI world.

Closed-source and open-source models like OpenAI's, Anthropic's, Google Gemini, and Meta Llama are vying for the future AI ecosystem entry point; while emerging players like DeepSeek are reshaping the competitive landscape through lower costs and higher inference efficiency. Competition in the LLM layer is also gradually shifting away from a pure pursuit of parameter count, with evaluation criteria increasingly turning to comparisons across multiple dimensions:


Token Cost
Inference Efficiency
Context Capability
Multi-Agent Collaboration
Long-Term Memory
Model & Infrastructure Synergy Capability

Because what truly matters in the AI era is not just how 'smart' a large model is, but whether the model can be operated continuously, at scale, and at low cost globally. GoodVision AI also has its optimization approach at this layer: by collaborating with large model vendors, deploying large models within its AI Factory facilities, transitioning from traditional compute rental business to directly providing Token services; this not only improves business gross margin but also offers a more user-friendly experience.

Fifth Layer Cake: Token Distribution – The 'Power Grid' of the AI Era

After AIDCs are built, the next question arises: How is this compute power used by the world?

Thus, compute rental platforms have emerged. They function like the 'power grid system' of the AI era, splitting up and distributing originally centralized GPU resources, then renting them on-demand to developers, enterprises, and AI applications.

AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud, and Tencent Cloud remain the most powerful players in this layer. They possess the world's largest cloud computing infrastructure and are gradually integrating AI GPU resources into their IaaS systems.

However, simultaneously, a batch of 'AI-native clouds' are rapidly rising. Companies like CoreWeave, Nebius, and Nscale build GPU cloud platforms specifically around AI training and inference needs. Compared to traditional cloud providers, they are more flexible, more focused on AI tasks, and more skilled at GPU cluster optimization.

CoreWeave is one of the most representative companies in the current NeoCloud scene. It initially focused on Ethereum mining, then pivoted entirely to AI GPU cloud services, and is now a key AI infrastructure company supported by NVIDIA.

Lightweight cloud platforms like DigitalOcean and Vultr target small-to-medium developers and startups, emphasizing rapid deployment and low-cost GPU services.

In the Chinese market, apart from the giants, companies like UCloud, Kingsoft Cloud, and Beijing Sinnet Technology Group are major suppliers in the GPU cloud and AI compute rental market. The competitive landscape in this layer is very similar to the early power grid era: how to efficiently distribute decentralized compute power.

Sixth Layer Cake: Token Optimization & Intelligent Scheduling – The Brain of the AI Era

This is perhaps the most underestimated yet most critical 'cake' layer. With the explosion in AI Agent usage, it became apparent that not all tasks warrant calling the most expensive large model. Many simple tasks can be handled by local models; many real-time tasks are better suited for edge inference; many privacy-sensitive tasks cannot even be uploaded to the cloud. After the question of 'Is there compute power?' comes another: 'How to use compute power more intelligently?'

As Token demand grows exponentially, 'Having the right model, on the right compute, handle the right task.' is key to ensuring Tokens are used rationally and efficiently. This is precisely one of the directions GoodVision AI is pursuing besides building AI Token factories.

It's like today's power system: some demand comes from the large grid; some comes from rooftop solar. What's truly important is the intermediate 'intelligent scheduling system.'

The future of AI will follow a similar structure: simple tasks handled by local small models, complex tasks calling cloud-based large models, high-privacy tasks processed at the edge, and high-concurrency tasks dynamically scheduled through hybrid clouds.

Besides GoodVision AI, companies like QingCloud Technology, Lambda, OpenRouter, and Fireworks AI are also leaders in Token optimization and intelligent scheduling.

This 'cake' layer overlaps significantly with the previous two layers—AIDC and Compute Rental. As GPU resources, regional nodes, and inference task scales continue to expand, merely 'owning compute' is no longer sufficient to build long-term barriers. More and more AIDC operators and GPU cloud platforms are realizing that what will truly determine efficiency and profit margins in the future is not just the number of GPUs, but how to dynamically schedule models, compute power, and Token traffic.

Therefore, many platforms originally focused on AIDC and GPU cloud are also extending into the 'intelligent scheduling layer.' For example, in the Chinese market, companies like UCloud, Beijing Sinnet Technology Group, and Sugon are attempting to integrate their own GPU cloud facilities, multi-cloud resources, and inference scheduling capabilities, gradually shifting from 'selling compute' to 'optimizing compute.'

Seventh Layer Cake: Models & Agents – The Token Consumers

This layer is closest to users and最容易获得流量(easiest to gain traffic), but the competition is also the fiercest. At GTC 2026, Jensen Huang proposed this view: In the future, every company will become a 'Token producer and Token consumer.'

An AI Agent might simultaneously call multiple models, multiple tools, multiple APIs, and continuously perform reasoning, planning, and execution. This means the volume of Tokens consumed by future AI will far exceed the scale of human-AI conversations today. Some current heavy AI users, building systems with multi-agent concurrency and inter-calls, can easily consume 1 billion Tokens per day.

The future is not 1 billion people using AI, but 10 billion, or even 100 billion AI Agents working simultaneously, calling each other. And the real bottleneck will shift from 'model capability' to 'Token scheduling efficiency.'

The tech giants naturally go without saying. Microsoft, Google, Meta, Amazon, etc., are gradually embedding AI capabilities into all their products through office systems, search, social networks, and cloud services.

Enterprise software companies like Adobe, Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Palantir are rapidly advancing in enterprise-grade AI Agents and automated workflow directions. Meanwhile, Hugging Face is becoming the 'GitHub' of the AI era. It's not just a model community but a crucial piece of infrastructure for the global AI development ecosystem.

In the Chinese market, companies like iFLYTEK, Kunlun Tech, 360 Security, Kingsoft Office, and SenseTime are making layouts around AI assistants, AI office tools, and AI Agents.

When the 'Seven-Layer Cake' Truly Takes Shape, the AI World Will Truly Begin

Today's AI industry actually still operates within an infrastructure system that is not yet fully mature.

Some possess the most advanced GPUs but are constrained by energy; some have built massive AIDCs but lack efficient scheduling; some develop powerful models and Agents but face high inference costs and latency; some control edge nodes but cannot form a unified, collaborative network.

From electricity, AIDC, GPU to LLM, Token distribution, intelligent scheduling, and AI Agent, although the entire AI industrial chain is developing rapidly, significant fragmentation, redundancy, and efficiency bottlenecks still exist between layers.

Only when this 'seven-layer cake' is fully constructed and begins to operate efficiently and synergistically will the AI industry transition from today's 'Tool Era' to the true 'Mass Adoption Era' belonging to the intelligent world.

The future AI world will no longer be just about a few tech giants training large models, but about tens of billions of AI Agents being continuously online, collaborating, and calling compute and Tokens. Every conversation, every inference, every tool call, every automated task execution corresponds to the coordinated operation of energy, GPUs, networks, scheduling systems, and inference nodes.

This also means the AI industry is evolving from its past 'software logic' into a super industrial system covering energy, chips, cloud computing, edge networks, and intelligent scheduling.

Just as the Industrial Revolution needed not only steam engines but also railways, power grids, and ports; just as the Internet Revolution needed not only PCs but also fiber optics, data centers, and cloud computing. The true hallmark of the AI Revolution's maturity will not be just one killer application, but the formation, on a global scale, of an 'intelligent infrastructure network' capable of continuously producing, distributing, scheduling, and consuming Tokens.

And when these seven layers of infrastructure are finally truly connected, the competitive logic of the AI industry will be completely restructured. The most important companies of the future might no longer be those with the largest models, but those capable of connecting energy, compute, networks, models, and Token flow.































Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what is the key driver of AI infrastructure expansion in 2026, shifting away from the previous focus?

AAccording to the article, the key driver of AI infrastructure expansion in 2026 is no longer model training but massive AI inference demand. Future computational power will primarily be consumed by AI Agents performing tasks, interactions, and calls worldwide.

QWhat is the core idea behind GoodVision AI's proposed "seven-layer cake" structure for the AI economy?

AThe core idea behind GoodVision AI's "seven-layer cake" structure is to frame the AI economy as a Token-centric industrial system. It moves from foundational energy (Layer 1) up through Token production (Layers 2-4), distribution and intelligent scheduling (Layers 5-6), to the final consumption by AI Agents (Layer 7).

QHow does the article describe the role and evolution of AIDCs (AI Data Centers) in the "Token Industrial Era"?

AThe article describes AIDCs as "Token factories," evolving from traditional, large-scale, centrally-located facilities to more modular, lightweight, and regionally-deployed "AI Factory" nodes. This shift aims for faster deployment, better local energy integration, and alignment with the trend of AI inference moving to the edge.

QWhat new competitive dimension is emerging in the LLM (Large Language Model) layer beyond just model size and capability?

ABeyond model size and capability, the new competitive dimensions for LLMs include Token cost, inference efficiency, context handling capability, multi-Agent collaboration, long-term memory, and the model's ability to synergize with underlying infrastructure for large-scale, low-cost, and continuous operation.

QWhat does the article identify as the ultimate sign of the AI industry reaching maturity and entering the "Mass Adoption Era"?

AThe article identifies the ultimate sign of AI industry maturity as the formation of a fully connected and efficiently协同运转的 "intelligent infrastructure network." This network seamlessly integrates all seven layers—from energy and chips to models, token调度, and agents—enabling the continuous production, distribution,调度, and consumption of Tokens on a global scale.

Lecturas Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitHace 7 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar LAYER

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Solayer (LAYER) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Solayer (LAYER) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Solayer (LAYER)Después de comprar tu Solayer (LAYER), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Solayer (LAYER)Tradear fácilmente con Solayer (LAYER) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

340 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.02.11Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar LAYER

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de LAYER (LAYER).

活动图片