From 'Criminal Cycle' to Value Return: Four Major Opportunities in the 2026 Crypto Market Outlook

深潮Publicado a 2025-12-09Actualizado a 2025-12-09

Resumen

The crypto market is undergoing a necessary "purification" phase, shifting from a "crime cycle" of high-FDV, low-utility projects and pump-and-dump schemes towards value-driven growth. Key 2025 trends included maturation of regulated stablecoins (with over $100B in net growth), the rise of PerpDEXs (reaching $230B open interest), and Digital Asset Trusts (DATs) attracting TradFi interest. However, many DATs and airdrops faltered, highlighting the need for real utility and sustainable tokenomics. Looking ahead to 2026, four major opportunities are identified: 1. **Prediction Markets:** Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, backed by institutional interest and mainstream distribution, are set to grow significantly. 2. **Stablecoin Payments:** Supported by clear regulations (e.g., the Genius Act) and adoption by giants like Visa and Stripe, stablecoin transaction volumes are surging. 3. **Mobile dApps:** With improved user onboarding and growing mobile transaction trends, apps like Fomo App are driving accessibility and adoption. 4. **Real Revenue and Value Accrual:** Protocols generating actual income (e.g., via buybacks) and sharing profits with token holders will thrive. The focus shifts from speculation to sustainable business models in trading, yield, and payments. The industry is evolving towards practical applications, genuine revenue, and clearer value propositions, making 2026 a pivotal year for crypto's maturation.

Author:Poopman

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Ansem announced the market peak, and CT called this cycle "criminal."

Projects with high FDV (Fully Diluted Valuation) but no real applications have squeezed the last penny out of the crypto space. Memecoin pump-and-dump schemes have tarnished the industry's reputation in the public eye.

To make matters worse, almost no funds have been reinvested into the ecosystem.

On the other hand, almost all airdrops have turned into "pump-and-dump" scams. The sole purpose of Token Generation Events (TGE) seems to be providing exit liquidity for early participants and teams.

Dedicated holders and long-term investors are suffering heavy losses, and most altcoins have never recovered.

The bubble is bursting, token prices are crashing, and people are furious.

Does This Mean It's All Over?

Tough times create strong players.

To be fair, 2025 wasn't a bad year.

We witnessed the birth of many excellent projects. Projects like Hyperliquid, MetaDAO, Pump.fun, Pendle, and FomoApp have all proven that there are still genuine builders in this space working hard to push development in the right way.

This is a necessary "purification" to weed out bad actors.

We are reflecting and will continue to improve.

Now, to attract more capital inflow and users, we need to demonstrate more practical applications, real business models, and revenue that can bring actual value to tokens. I believe this is the direction the industry should move in for 2026.

2025: The Year of Stablecoins, PerpDex, and DATs

Stablecoins Mature

In July 2025, the Genius Act was officially signed, marking the first regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, requiring them to be 100% backed by cash or short-term Treasury bonds.

Since then, traditional finance (TradFi) interest in the stablecoin space has grown daily, with net inflows into stablecoins exceeding $100 billion this year alone, making it the strongest year in stablecoin history.

RWA.xyz

Institutions favor stablecoins and see great potential in replacing traditional payment systems for reasons including:

  • Lower cost and more efficient cross-border transactions

  • Instant settlement

  • Low transaction fees

  • 24/7 availability

  • Hedging against local currency volatility

  • On-chain transparency

We witnessed major M&A moves by tech giants (like Stripe acquiring Bridge and Privy), Circle's IPO being oversubscribed, and multiple top banks collectively expressing interest in launching their own stablecoins.

All this indicates that stablecoins have indeed been maturing over the past year.

Stablewatch

Beyond payments, another major application for stablecoins is earning permissionless yield, which we call Yield Bearing Stablecoins (YBS).

This year, the total supply of YBS actually doubled, reaching $12.5 billion, driven primarily by yield providers like BlackRock BUIDL, Ethena, and sUSDs.

Despite the rapid growth, recent events like the Stream Finance incident and broader weak crypto market performance have dampened sentiment and reduced yields on these products.

Nonetheless, stablecoins remain one of the few truly sustainable and growing businesses in crypto.

PerpDex (Perpetual Decentralized Exchanges):

PerpDex was another star this year.

According to DeFiLlama, PerpDex open interest (OI) grew on average 3–4x, from $3 billion to $11 billion, and even peaked at $23 billion.

Perpetual trading volume also surged massively, skyrocketing 4x since the start of the year from an astonishing $80 billion weekly volume to over $300 billion weekly volume (partly fueled by points farming), making it one of the fastest-growing sectors in crypto.

However, both metrics have started to show signs of slowing down since the market correction on October 10th and the subsequent market downturn.

PerpDex Open Interest (OI), Data Source: DeFiLlama

The rapid growth of Perpetual Decentralized Exchanges (PerpDex) poses a real threat to the dominance of Centralized Exchanges (CEX).

Take Hyperliquid, for example; its perpetual trading volume has reached 10% of Binance's, and the trend continues. This is not surprising, as traders can find advantages on PerpDex that CEX perpetuals cannot offer:

  1. No KYC (Know Your Customer)

  2. Decent liquidity, sometimes comparable to CEX

  3. Airdrop speculation opportunities

The valuation game is another key point.

Hyperliquid demonstrated that Perpetual DEXs (PerpDex) can achieve extremely high valuation caps, attracting a wave of new competitors into the arena.

Some new competitors are backed by large VCs or CEXs (like Lighter, Aster, etc.), while others try to differentiate through native mobile apps, loss compensation mechanisms (like Egdex, Variational, etc.).

Retail investors had high expectations for the high FDV at the launch of these projects, coupled with anticipation for airdrop rewards, leading to the "POINTS WAR" we see today.

Although PerpDex can be highly profitable, Hyperliquid chose to buy back $HYPE through an "Assistance Fund," reinjecting profits back into the token (accumulating to 3.6% of the total supply).

This buyback mechanism, by providing actual value flowback, became a major driver of the token's success and effectively pioneered the "buyback meta" trend—prompting investors to demand stronger value anchors, not high-FDV governance tokens with no real utility.

DAT (Digital Asset Trusts):

Due to Trump's pro-crypto stance, we saw massive institutional and Wall Street capital flowing into crypto.

DATs, inspired by MicroStrategy's strategy, have become a primary way for TradFi to gain indirect exposure to crypto assets.

Over the past year, approximately 76 new DATs were created. Currently, DAT treasuries hold $137 billion worth of crypto assets. Over 82% is Bitcoin (BTC), about 13% is Ethereum (ETH), and the rest is scattered among various altcoins.

See the chart below:

Bitmine (BMNR)

Bitmine (BMNR), launched by Tom Lee, became an iconic highlight of this DAT frenzy and the largest ETH buyer among all DAT participants.

However, despite early hype, most DAT stocks experienced "pump-and-dump" patterns within the first 10 days. Since October 10th, inflows into DATs plummeted 90% from July levels, and the market NAV (mNAV) for most DATs has fallen below 1, indicating premiums have vanished, and the DAT frenzy is largely over.

In this cycle, we learned the following:

  • Blockchain needs more real-world applications.

  • The primary use cases in crypto remain trading, yield, and payments.

  • People now prefer protocols with fee-generation potential over pure decentralization (Source: @EbisuEthan).

  • Most tokens need stronger value anchors, tied to protocol fundamentals, to protect and reward long-term holders.

  • A more mature regulatory and legislative environment will provide greater confidence for builders and talent to join the space.

  • Information has become a tradable asset on the internet (Source: PM, Kaito).

  • New Layer 1/Layer 2 projects without a clear niche or competitive advantage will fade away.

So, what's next?

2026: The Year of Prediction Markets, More Stablecoins, More Mobile Apps, and More Real Revenue

I believe the crypto space will move in the following four directions in 2026:

  • Prediction Markets

  • More Stablecoin Payment Services

  • Greater Adoption of Mobile DApps

  • More Real Revenue Realization

Still Prediction Markets

Undoubtedly, prediction markets have become one of the hottest sectors in crypto.

"Bet on anything"

"90% accuracy in predicting real-world outcomes"

"Participants bring their own risk-taking"

These headlines have attracted massive attention, and the fundamentals of prediction markets are equally compelling.

As of writing, the total weekly trading volume of prediction markets has surpassed the peak during the election period (even including wash trading volume back then).

Today, giants like Polymarket and Kalshi completely dominate distribution channels and liquidity, leaving little room for competitors without significant differentiation to gain meaningful market share (Opinion Lab being an exception).

Institutions are also piling in. Polymarket received investment from ICE at an $8 billion valuation, and its secondary market valuation has reached $12–15 billion. Meanwhile, Kalshi completed a Series E round at an $11 billion valuation.

This momentum is unstoppable.

Moreover, with the upcoming $POLY token, impending IPO, and mainstream distribution channels through platforms like Robinhood and Google Search, prediction markets are likely to be one of the major narratives of 2026.

That said, there is still much room for improvement in prediction markets, such as optimizing outcome resolution and dispute mechanisms, developing methods to handle malicious traffic, and maintaining user engagement over long feedback cycles.

Beyond the dominant players, we can also expect new, more personalized prediction markets, such as @BentoDotFun.

Stablecoin Payments Space

Following the enactment of the Genius Act, increased institutional interest and activity in stablecoin payments have been a key driver for their broader adoption.

Over the past year, monthly stablecoin transaction volume has climbed to nearly $3 trillion, and the adoption rate is accelerating rapidly. While this may not be a perfect metric, it clearly shows significant growth in stablecoin usage post-Genius Act and the European MiCA framework.

On the other hand, Visa, Mastercard, and Stripe are actively embracing stablecoin payments, whether by supporting stablecoin spending through traditional payment networks or partnering with CEXs (like Mastercard with OKX Pay). Merchants can now choose to accept stablecoin payments regardless of the customer's payment method, demonstrating the confidence and flexibility of Web2 giants in this asset class.

Meanwhile, crypto neo-banks like Etherfi and Argent (now rebranded as Ready) have started offering card products, allowing users to spend stablecoins directly.

Take Etherfi, for example; its daily spending has steadily grown to over $1 million, with no signs of slowing down.

Etherfi

That said, we cannot ignore the challenges still faced by crypto neo-banks, such as high user acquisition costs (CAC) and the difficulty of profiting from deposited funds due to user self-custody.

Some potential solutions include offering in-app token swaps or repackaging yield products as financial services sold to users.

With payment-focused chains like @tempo and @Plasma gearing up, I expect significant growth in the payments sector, especially driven by the distribution power and brand influence brought by Stripe and Paradigm.

Adoption of Mobile Applications

Smartphones are becoming increasingly ubiquitous globally, and younger generations are driving the shift towards digital payments.

To date, nearly 10% of daily global transactions are conducted via mobile devices. Southeast Asia leads this trend due to its "mobile-first" culture.

Payment Method Rankings by Country

This represents a fundamental behavioral shift in traditional payment networks. I believe this shift will naturally extend to the crypto space as mobile transaction infrastructure has improved significantly compared to a few years ago.

Remember account abstraction (Account Abstraction) in tools like Privy, unified interfaces, and mobile SDKs?

Today's mobile user onboarding experience is much smoother than it was two years ago.

According to a16z Crypto research, the number of crypto mobile wallet users grew 23% year-over-year, and this trend shows no signs of slowing down.

Beyond Gen Z's changing consumption habits, we also saw more native mobile dApps emerge in 2025.

For example, Fomo App, as a social trading application, attracted a large number of new users with its intuitive and unified user experience, allowing anyone to participate in token trading easily, even without prior knowledge.

Developed in just 6 months, the app achieved an average daily trading volume of $3 million and peaked at $13 million in October.

With Fomo's rise, major players like Aave and Polymarket have also prioritized offering mobile savings and betting experiences. Newcomers like @sproutfi_xyz are experimenting with mobile-first yield models.

As mobile behavior continues to grow, I expect mobile dApps to be one of the fastest-expanding areas in 2026.

Give Me More Revenue

One of the main reasons people find this cycle hard to believe is simple:

Most tokens listed on major exchanges still generate little meaningful revenue, and even if they do, there's a lack of a value anchor linking it to the token or "share." Once the narrative fades, these tokens fail to attract sustainable buyers, and the next move is often only one direction—down.

Clearly, the crypto industry relies too much on speculation and pays insufficient attention to real business fundamentals.

Most DeFi projects fall into the trap of designing "Ponzi schemes" to drive early adoption, but the result each time is a focus on dumping after the Token Generation Event (TGE), rather than building an enduring product.

To date, only 60 protocols have generated over $1 million in revenue in the last 30 days. In contrast, there are about 5,000–7,000 IT companies in Web2 with monthly revenue at this level.

Fortunately, a shift began in 2025, aided by Trump's pro-crypto policies. These policies made profit-sharing possible and helped address the long-standing lack of value anchors for tokens.

Projects like Hyperliquid, Pump, Uniswap, Aave proactively focused on product and revenue growth. They recognize that crypto is an ecosystem centered around holding assets, naturally requiring active value flowback.

This is why buybacks became such a powerful value anchoring tool in 2025, as it is one of the clearest signals of alignment between team and investor interests.

So, which businesses generate the strongest revenue?

Crypto's primary use cases remain trading, yield, and payments.

However, due to fee compression in blockchain infrastructure, chain-level revenue is expected to decline by about 40% this year. In contrast, DEXs, exchanges, wallets, trading terminals, and applications were the biggest winners, growing 113%!

Bet more on applications and DEXs.

If you're still not convinced, according to 1kx research, we are actually experiencing the peak of value flowing to token holders in crypto history. See the data below:

Conclusion

The crypto industry is not over; it is evolving. We are undergoing a necessary "purification" that will make the crypto ecosystem better than ever, even ten times better.

Projects that survive, achieve real-world applications, generate real revenue, and create tokens with actual utility or value flowback will ultimately be the biggest winners.

2026 will be a crucial year.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the four major opportunities in the crypto market for 2026 as discussed in the article?

AThe four major opportunities for 2026 are Prediction Markets, more stablecoin payment services, greater adoption of mobile DApps, and the generation of more real revenue.

QWhat was the main driver behind the increased institutional interest in stablecoin payments in 2025?

AThe main driver was the signing of the Genius Act in July 2025, which created the first regulatory framework for payment stablecoins, requiring them to be 100% backed by cash or short-term Treasury bonds.

QHow did PerpDex platforms like Hyperliquid challenge the dominance of Centralized Exchanges (CEXs)?

APerpDex platforms challenged CEXs by offering advantages such as no KYC requirements, comparable liquidity in some cases, and opportunities for airdrop speculation. For example, Hyperliquid's perpetual trading volume reached 10% of Binance's.

QWhat is the significance of the 'buyback meta' trend mentioned in the article?

AThe 'buyback meta' trend, pioneered by Hyperliquid, signifies a shift where protocols use their revenue to buy back their own tokens, providing a tangible value anchor and rewarding long-term holders instead of issuing high FDV tokens with no utility.

QAccording to the article, what are the primary use cases for cryptocurrency that continue to drive the market?

AThe primary use cases for cryptocurrency that drive the market are trading, yield generation (earning), and payments.

Lecturas Relacionadas

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ruHace 3 hora(s)

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ruHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片