From Bangers to Flops: A Critical Review of 21 Mainstream Crypto Narratives in 2025

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-17Actualizado a 2025-12-17

Resumen

Tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) continues to grow, reaching a market size of $200 billion, while stablecoins ($3100B) are becoming critical infrastructure for payments and digital banking. Prediction markets and perpetual contracts are also seeing record activity. In the top tier, BTCFi is gaining traction as Bitcoin becomes productive capital, and privacy solutions are increasingly important for institutional adoption. AI remains a major area of interest, and DeFi is shifting toward consumer applications with all-time high TVL. Emerging areas like chain abstraction and InfoFi are reducing user friction and refining data markets, though they are still developing. Robotics and ZK-technology remain more promising in theory than practice. Meanwhile, staking and restaking face yield compression and complexity, and DePIN struggles with real-world integration. L1/L2 development is slowing as value shifts to applications. SocialFi and GameFi still lack sustainable user retention or product-market fit. NFTs remain stuck in speculative JPEG trading, meme coins are losing dominance, and modular blockchains, while architecturally significant, lack compelling investment narratives.

Author: DeFi Warhol

Compiled by: Tim, PANews

Bangers

Tokenization: The scale of RWA continues to hit new highs (approximately $200 billion), with an increasing number of stocks and commodities being tokenized. As mainstream funds and custodial institutions continue to expand across major trading platforms, this is no longer just a conceptual idea.

Stablecoins: As a market with a market cap of $310 billion, stablecoins are gradually becoming the infrastructure for foreign exchange, payments, credit cards, and digital banking distribution, serving as the best bridge from the crypto world to real-world applications.

Prediction Markets: Trading volume and user numbers in prediction markets are repeatedly reaching new highs. With the integration of mainstream crypto applications and traditional financial institutions, their adoption is accelerating.

Perpetual Contracts: Perpetual contracts still dominate crypto market trading volume, with derivatives trading far exceeding spot trading. The monthly trading volume of on-chain perpetual contract platforms has matched that of centralized exchanges, surpassing $1 trillion.

Top Tier

BTCFi: Bitcoin is transforming into productive capital, with billions of BTC being used for staking, yield generation, and collateral. Babylon and Lombard hold a significant share of the staking TVL for BTC.

Privacy: As more traditional financial capital moves on-chain, selective disclosure becomes crucial. Institutions require compliant-friendly privacy solutions for payments, identity verification, and corporate fund flows.

AI: AI and crypto technologies continue to evolve, becoming essential tools for processing data, powering intelligent agents, and enabling verifiable computation. The potential is immense, and the scale of this industry cannot be ignored.

DeFi: DeFi is shifting towards consumer applications. Coinbase currently offers in-app DEX trading and USDC lending via Morpho. DeFi TVL has reached an all-time high, and new consumer applications are emerging rapidly.

Elite

Chain Abstraction: Smart accounts, intents, and embedded wallets reduce user friction, making blockchain invisible. Significant improvements in user experience are critical for adoption, although development is relatively slow.

InfoFi: Despite recent market fears, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD), InfoFi remains a refinery for data markets, incentivized activities, and trading signals. Major breakthroughs in InfoFi are imminent. Is InfoFi 2.0 on the horizon?

Bots: The vision is grander than the actual progress. The development speed of hardware and deployment cannot match that of cryptocurrency, making this more of an early-stage infrastructure phase.

ZK: It is undoubtedly a core technology, but it is complex as an investment. Most value will accumulate in ecosystems that can apply ZK technology at scale, rather than as a standalone concept.

Software Infrastructure: Demand remains stable (e.g., RPC, indexing, interoperability, data availability), but competition is super fierce. Nevertheless, this field may still yield high-quality projects.

NPC

Staking and Restaking: Restaking works, but yields continue to compress, slashing risks are real, and complex operations deter ordinary investors. The narrative in this track has been overheated from the start.

DePIN: In its ideal state, DePIN should integrate and cooperate with the real world, but many projects still struggle to achieve this. Regulatory pressure and a lack of sustainable business models are hindering its development.

L1 & L2: Rollups have become the mainstream scaling solution, but the momentum for new public chains is weak. Most value is now shifting towards applications, liquidity, and ecosystem distribution, rather than just another underlying protocol.

SocialFi: Although there are occasional peaks in user activity, user retention and lasting product-market fit have not been achieved and are likely to remain elusive in the short term.

Flops

GameFi: The Play-to-Earn model has fundamental flaws. Although some gaming chains are still operational, most GameFi projects are just reskinned DeFi with extra steps and a worse user experience.

NFT: We have witnessed multiple attempts at an NFT market recovery, but market reactions have shown that without breaking through the limitations of JPEGs and profile pictures to create new use cases, NFTs will remain stuck in their current predicament. Even attempts at integration in gaming have so far failed to achieve a breakthrough.

Meme Coins: Although the meme coin super cycle was lively, liquidity is shifting towards serious projects, and their market dominance continues to decline. Retail investors are tired of being repeatedly harvested in the game of chasing the next 100x myth.

Modular Blockchains: Important architecture, poor narrative. Users don't care, and investors are only interested in whether there is a clear, sustainable profit mechanism—something most modular projects currently lack.

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

PancakeSwapCAKE

JUSTJST

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the main categories of crypto narratives for 2025 as discussed in the article, and which one is considered the most promising?

AThe article categorizes the 21 mainstream crypto narratives for 2025 into five tiers: 'Boom' (most promising), 'Top-tier', 'Elite', 'NPC', and 'Bust' (least promising). The 'Boom' category, which includes Tokenization, Stablecoins, Prediction Markets, and Perpetuals, is considered the most promising as these areas are already demonstrating significant real-world traction and growth.

QAccording to the article, why is the 'Stablecoin' narrative placed in the 'Boom' category?

AStablecoins are placed in the 'Boom' category because they represent a massive $310 billion market that is becoming fundamental infrastructure for forex, payments, credit cards, and digital banking distribution. The article describes them as the best bridge from the crypto world to real-world applications.

QWhat is the author's primary criticism of the 'GameFi' and 'NFT' narratives, which are placed in the 'Bust' category?

AThe author criticizes 'GameFi' for having a fundamentally flawed Play-to-Earn model, stating most projects are just 'DeFi with extra steps and a worse experience.' For 'NFTs', the criticism is that the market remains stuck in its current predicament, unable to break out of the JPEG and profile picture use case or create new application scenarios, with even gaming integrations failing to provide a breakthrough.

QHow does the article describe the current state and future potential of the 'ZK' (Zero-Knowledge) narrative?

AThe article describes ZK as 'undoubtedly core technology' but notes it is a complex investment. It states that most of the value will accrue to the ecosystems that can apply ZK technology at scale, rather than to ZK as a standalone investment concept.

QWhat reason does the article give for the 'Meme coin' narrative's decline in dominance and placement in the 'Bust' category?

AThe article states that liquidity is shifting towards 'real projects' and the market dominance of Meme coins is continuously declining. It attributes this to retail investors being 'tired of being farmed and chasing the next 100x game,' indicating a loss of interest and a move away from speculative assets without fundamental value.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinistHace 50 min(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinistHace 50 min(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar O

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar O1 exchange (O) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar O1 exchange (O) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu O1 exchange (O)Después de comprar tu O1 exchange (O), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear O1 exchange (O)Tradear fácilmente con O1 exchange (O) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

509 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.06.19Actualizado en 2026.06.29

Cómo comprar PROS

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Pharos (PROS) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Pharos (PROS) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Pharos (PROS)Después de comprar tu Pharos (PROS), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Pharos (PROS)Tradear fácilmente con Pharos (PROS) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

518 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.06.22Actualizado en 2026.06.29

Qué es VERONA

I. Introducción al Proyecto VERONA es una blockchain construida para todos, en todas partes a través de la abstracción de cadenas. Utilizando su capa de Abstracción Generalizada, VERONA se distingue por integrar funcionalidades complejas de blockchain, como cuentas, firmas e interoperabilidad, directamente a nivel de protocolo. Este enfoque permite interactuar con aplicaciones de blockchain sin necesidad de entender las tecnologías subyacentes.1) Información Básica Nombre: VERONA (VERONA)III. Enlaces Relacionados Enlace al sitio web oficial: https://xion.burnt.com/ Libro Blanco: https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Exploradores: https://explorer.burnt.com/ Redes Sociales: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: La introducción del proyecto proviene de los materiales publicados o proporcionados por el equipo oficial del proyecto, que es solo para referencia y no constituye asesoramiento de inversión. HTX no se hace responsable de ninguna pérdida directa o indirecta resultante.

597 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.06.22Actualizado en 2026.06.22

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de A (A).