From a "Preemptive Bet" Trade, Understanding the Hottest Web3 Trend of 2025: Prediction Markets

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-07Actualizado a 2026-01-07

Resumen

In early January 2025, a significant transaction on the decentralized prediction platform Polymarket drew widespread attention. An account invested approximately $32,537 over four days betting that Venezuelan President Maduro would leave office by January 31. The bet was placed hours before related geopolitical news became public, eventually yielding over $400,000 in profit as the event's perceived likelihood surged. This incident highlights the growing influence of prediction markets—a rapidly expanding Web3 sector in 2025. Prediction markets use financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information, allowing participants to trade on event outcomes. Prices reflect collective intelligence, often outperforming traditional polls, as seen during the 2024 U.S. election. Key platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi have attracted over $3.15 billion in funding, with Polymarket’s valuation reaching $8–9 billion after a strategic investment from ICE. The sector is projected to grow from $900 million in trading volume in 2024 to $40 billion in 2025, with users increasing from 4 million to 15 million. Unlike gambling, prediction markets use transparent, market-driven pricing and serve as data products for decision-making, attracting researchers and institutional players. Their growth is fueled by regulatory clarity from the CFTC, expanded event categories, and improved technology. However, risks remain, including potential insider trading and market manipulation. Participation is pro...

I. Introduction

In early January Beijing time, a piece of news circulated on overseas social platforms and within various crypto communities: the U.S. government had taken strong action regarding the situation in Venezuela, drawing significant attention from the international community. Almost simultaneously, a transaction record on a decentralized prediction platform quickly became a major topic of discussion in the market.

Data shows that over a span of just four days starting December 27, 2025, an account on the prediction market platform Polymarket accumulated an investment of approximately $32,537, consistently betting on the event that "Venezuelan President Maduro will step down before January 31." Notably, this account established a large position within a few hours before the related news was widely discussed externally.

At that time, the market's overall pricing for the probability of the related event occurring was not high, around 6%. As the situation evolved and official U.S. statements were released, the value of the account's holdings rapidly increased, ultimately realizing paper profits exceeding $400,000, with a return rate reaching over tenfold at one point.

Whether this trade involved insider information remains subject to further investigation by regulators and the platform. But it is sufficient to raise a question—what exactly is this frequently mentioned Polymarket? And why have prediction markets rapidly gained popularity in 2025?

This article will use this event to systematically introduce this rapidly expanding Web3 sector.

II. What is a Prediction Market? Why Can It "Aggregate Collective Wisdom"

A Prediction Market is essentially a mechanism that uses financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information.

In a prediction market, participants need to use real money to express their views on the outcome of a specific event through trading. As different judgments continuously compete in the market, the price gradually converges to a level that reflects the "collective judgment probability." This mechanism allows prediction markets, in certain scenarios, to come closer to the actual outcome than traditional surveys or subjective judgments.

This advantage was fully demonstrated during the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Prediction market platforms, represented by Polymarket, provided probability judgments on election outcomes at several key junctures that were noticeably ahead of traditional polling agencies. Their predictive accuracy was subsequently validated after the final results were confirmed.

As credibility continues to accumulate, prediction markets are being cited more widely:

  • Mainstream financial media (e.g., Bloomberg) directly reference their odds data in reports;
  • Search engines and AI Q&A products (e.g., Perplexity) display prediction market results as reference information;
  • Prediction markets are gradually transitioning from an "internal tool within the crypto community" to a public source of information.

In terms of market size, industry growth is also significant. Multiple research institutions estimate:

  • The total trading volume of prediction markets in 2025 is expected to grow from approximately $900 million in 2024 to $40 billion;
  • The user base is projected to grow from about 4 million to 15 million people;

At the capital level, prediction markets have also received high recognition. By 2025, the two platforms Polymarket and Kalshi had attracted cumulative funding exceeding $3.15 billion, holding an absolute dominant position in the industry. In October 2025, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, announced a strategic investment in Polymarket, pushing its valuation into the $8-9 billion range. Simultaneously, Kalshi also completed several large funding rounds, with investors including multiple global leading institutions.

Amid these overlapping factors, prediction markets are widely regarded as one of the most representative Web3 sectors of 2025.

III. Prediction Markets ≠ Gambling: The Essential Differences Between the Two Mechanisms

As the popularity of prediction markets rises, a common controversy also emerges: are prediction markets just "gambling in a new shell"?

From an underlying mechanism perspective, the two have fundamental differences.

1. Different Price Formation Mechanisms

Prediction markets adopt a market-based pricing logic. Prices are formed through the博弈 (game/competition) between buyers and sellers in a public order book. All transaction data is auditable. The platform itself does not set probabilities nor bear outcome risks; it only collects transaction fees.

Gambling platforms, however, set odds internally. Their calculation logic is not transparent, and they ensure long-term profitability through the "house edge." The goal of adjusting odds is not to discover the true probability but to control the platform's risk.

2. Functional and Purpose Differences

The prices generated by prediction markets are essentially a data product that can be used externally. They can be applied in scenarios such as macro event judgment, policy expectation analysis, corporate risk management, and can even inversely influence media narratives and decision-making references.

Gambling behavior is primarily for entertainment consumption. Its odds do not possess spillover value nor serve an information discovery function.

3. Differences in Participant Structure

Liquidity in prediction markets comes from information-driven participants, including researchers, macro traders, data analysts, institutional users, etc. Their core goal is to arbitrage and discover prices using information asymmetry.

Liquidity in gambling markets mainly comes from ordinary consumers, who are more easily driven by emotions and preferences, not focusing on information accuracy.

Because of this, prediction markets are often seen as a form of "information liquidity market," rather than traditional entertainment gambling.

IV. Why Did Prediction Markets Explode in Popularity in 2025?

Prediction markets are not a new concept; their theoretical foundations can be traced back to the last century. However, achieving规模化 (scalable) growth truly relied on the maturation of multiple external conditions in 2025.

First, there was a key breakthrough in regulation. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) gradually clarified the compliant positioning of prediction markets, defining them as falling under the category of commodity derivatives, not gambling behavior. This change allowed prediction markets to be distributed through broader channels. Post-compliance, the coverage of prediction markets in the U.S. even surpassed that of some traditional gambling businesses, reaching all 50 states.

Second, there was a restoration of institutional confidence and capital inflow. With clear regulatory boundaries, the financing path for prediction market platforms rapidly widened. Multiple large funding rounds provided support for product experience, liquidity, and risk control systems.

Third, there was an expansion of event categories. Evolving from macro-political events to include economic data, crypto industry events, and even sports events, making the application scenarios of prediction markets more diverse.

Finally, there was technological maturity. On-chain settlement, automated market making, and the application of AI tools in information analysis and trading assistance collectively lowered the barriers to participation and use.

These factors worked together, making 2025 the year prediction markets truly "broke out" into the mainstream.

V. Risks and Boundaries: A Rational View on Prediction Markets

It must be emphasized that prediction markets are not without controversy. The "preemptive positioning" case mentioned at the beginning of the article also reflects that insider information, manipulation prevention, and compliance enforcement remain issues requiring continuous improvement in this field.

It also needs to be clearly stated that Mainland China explicitly prohibits related prediction and disguised gambling activities. Ordinary users should not participate in any activities that do not comply with local laws and regulations.

However, from a research and industry observation perspective, prediction markets, as a tool for information aggregation and probability expression, still hold value worth attention and study in terms of systems, technology, and product design.

For the Web3 industry, it offers a new direction: not merely revolving around "asset speculation," but building data infrastructure around information, decision-making, and real-world events that can be used by real society. This, perhaps, is the real reason prediction markets are widely discussed in 2025.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is a prediction market and how does it aggregate collective intelligence?

AA prediction market is a mechanism that uses financial incentives to aggregate dispersed information. Participants use real money to trade on the outcome of an event, and through market博弈, the price converges to a level that reflects the 'collective judgment probability'. This allows prediction markets to often be closer to the true outcome than traditional surveys or subjective judgments in certain scenarios.

QWhy did prediction markets gain significant popularity in 2025?

APrediction markets gained popularity in 2025 due to multiple factors: key regulatory breakthroughs, such as the CFTC clarifying their legal status as commodity derivatives rather than gambling; restored institutional confidence and capital inflow; expansion of event categories beyond politics to include economic data and sports; and technological成熟, including on-chain settlement and AI tools lowering participation barriers.

QWhat are the fundamental differences between prediction markets and gambling?

APrediction markets and gambling differ in pricing mechanisms (market-driven vs. house-set odds), functionality (prediction markets produce data products for external use like risk management, while gambling is primarily entertainment), and participant structure (information-driven users like researchers vs. emotion-driven consumers). Prediction markets are seen as 'information liquidity markets', not entertainment gambling.

QWhat was the notable transaction involving Polymarket and Venezuela in early 2025, and why was it significant?

AIn early 2025, an account on Polymarket invested $32,537 over four days betting that Venezuela's President Maduro would step down by January 31, just before related news spread. The market probability was around 6% at the time, but the account's position grew to over $400,000 in paper gains as events unfolded. This transaction raised questions about insider information and highlighted prediction markets' ability to capture and monetize early information, though it also underscored risks like manipulation.

QHow has the scale and acceptance of prediction markets evolved by 2025?

ABy 2025, prediction markets saw substantial growth: total trading volume was projected to rise from about $900 million in 2024 to $40 billion, with user numbers increasing from 4 million to 15 million. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi attracted over $3.15 billion in funding, and mainstream adoption grew, with outlets like Bloomberg citing their data and AI tools like Perplexity using them as reference sources, moving from crypto社区 tools to public information providers.

Lecturas Relacionadas

10 Billion Repurchase Fails to Halt HYPE's Decline, Are Core Members and Multicoin Quietly Selling Tokens?

Foresight News reports that despite a massive $1 billion buyback program by the Assistance Fund, the HYPE token has fallen from its July high of $70 to around $52.40. Analyst MLM tracked data showing that since team token vesting began in December 2025, approximately 4.93 million HYPE (worth ~$270M) were allocated to core contributors. Of these, 1.19 million (~$32.5M) were sold on the open market, and 3.14 million (~$132M) were transferred to OTC desks. However, the report argues that direct team selling is not the primary driver of the price decline. In the same period, the protocol's Assistance Fund used 99% of trading fees to repurchase about 9.8 million HYPE for approximately $364 million, a rate more than double the team's selling pressure. The analysis points to other significant factors: major venture capital firms like Multicoin Capital and a16z have been unstaking and moving substantial amounts of HYPE to exchanges, with some confirming sales for portfolio management. Additionally, HYPE spot ETFs have experienced consistent daily net outflows since early July, reversing the strong inflows seen in May and June. The report concludes that while protocol buybacks absorb team selling, declining trading volume reduces this buyback power, and combined selling pressure from large investors and ETFs has significantly impacted the price.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

10 Billion Repurchase Fails to Halt HYPE's Decline, Are Core Members and Multicoin Quietly Selling Tokens?

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Wall Street Morning News: V-shaped Rebound at Month-end, but Nasdaq Suffers Worst July in 12 Years; Funds Accelerate Concentration Towards Cloud Giants

Despite a V-shaped rebound at the end of July, the Nasdaq posted its worst July since 2004, while the S&P 500 had its worst July since 2014. Markets were jolted by geopolitical shifts, as President Trump canceled a planned strike on Iran, leading WTI crude to plunge over 8%. This, alongside OPEC+ announcing a supply increase, reversed crude's sharp July gains. Treasury yields surged, with the 10-year yield rising over 30 basis points in July—its largest July increase since 2005. In a rare move, the US and Japan jointly intervened to weaken the USD/JPY, aiming to prevent potential Japanese sales of US Treasuries. While the tech sector faced deleveraging pressure throughout July, cloud giants staged a massive rally on strong earnings. Microsoft, Amazon, and Google collectively added nearly $1.5 trillion in market value last week. Amazon soared over 15% on accelerating AWS growth, Microsoft extended historic gains, Google fully recovered post-earnings losses, and Meta ended an 11-day losing streak. In contrast, Apple tumbled over 7% on supply chain and guidance concerns, ceding its "world's most valuable company" title to Nvidia. The memory and storage sector corrected sharply. Gold edged up 0.91% in July, with analysts viewing the ~30% pullback from January highs as a potential basing period, supported by long-term central bank demand. Key events to watch this week include earnings from Palantir, AMD, SpaceX (its first post-IPO report), and memory giants like Western Digital. The US July non-farm payrolls report on Friday will be critical for gauging the Fed's policy path. SpaceX also faces a significant lock-up expiration, testing market liquidity.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Wall Street Morning News: V-shaped Rebound at Month-end, but Nasdaq Suffers Worst July in 12 Years; Funds Accelerate Concentration Towards Cloud Giants

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

NVIDIA's Rubin Ultra, the top-tier variant of the newly announced Rubin AI accelerators, has reportedly seen significant specification downgrades, according to an industry report from SemiAnalysis. Initially designed with four compute dies (4-die), the Rubin Ultra is now said to be reduced to a 2-die design. Key changes highlighted in the report include: * **No increase in peak theoretical compute performance**, remaining at 35 PFLOPs like the standard Rubin. * **Severe reduction in memory capacity** to 192GB using 8-Hi HBM stacks, which is less than the standard Rubin's 288GB using 12-Hi stacks. * **Negligible memory bandwidth improvement** of only 1 TB/s. * **Slightly higher chip-level power consumption**. * The **primary upgrade is a massive increase in scale-up interconnect capacity**, supporting connections for up to 576 GPUs via NVLink, compared to 72 for the standard Rubin. The report suggests the redesign is primarily a cost-optimization move driven by the sharp rise in HBM (High-Bandwidth Memory) prices. By reducing the expensive HBM content and shifting investment towards enhanced system-scale networking, NVIDIA aims to maintain the platform's value for large-scale AI training clusters while managing soaring material costs. The news reportedly triggered a sell-off in South Korean memory stocks, with SK Hynix and Samsung shares falling around 8%, as markets grew concerned that NVIDIA—a major HBM buyer—might be reducing its reliance on high-capacity memory, potentially capping future pricing power for memory makers.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Rubin Ultra Makes Major Cuts, Even Nvidia Can't Handle Memory Price Hikes?

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片