Former Ripple CTO Lied to XRP Holders? David Schwartz Makes Key Clarification

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-05-05Actualizado a 2026-05-05

David Schwartz, former CTO at Ripple, has pushed back against accusations that he misled XRP holders, addressing claims of secret government agreements and hidden price mechanisms in a series of posts on X that appear to have reignited a long-running debate within the community.

The controversy surfaced after X user @uptownsaul raised questions about whether Schwartz had been less than transparent with the XRP community regarding Ripple’s undisclosed agreements. The exchange prompted the Ripple veteran to step in with a direct clarification — one that touched on NDAs, price theories, and what he described as persistent misinformation circulating in the space.

Schwartz Draws A Line Between NDAs And Conspiracy Theories

According to his posts on X, Schwartz did not deny that Ripple maintains confidential agreements. He acknowledged that many of the company’s partners require NDAs to protect their business arrangements. What he pushed back on was the interpretation of those agreements as evidence of something larger.

In his posts, Schwartz appeared to categorize recurring claims — that the U.S. government has a secret plan for XRP, or that Ripple is holding back a mechanism to drive prices sharply higher — as conspiracy theories that are “almost always” false. He stated that no secret agreements with the government exist and that Ripple’s escrow releases follow a fixed, publicly verifiable schedule on the XRP Ledger.

A Pointed Challenge To Price Theories

Schwartz also addressed long-standing speculation about extreme XRP price targets. In one post on X, he questioned why well-capitalized investors who truly believed in a multi-thousand-dollar XRP scenario would not already be bidding the price significantly higher — framing the absence of such activity as its own form of market data.

When X user @NeilBilon weighed in on the discussion, Schwartz responded again, reiterating that Ripple’s operations and goals are communicated through public channels, even if certain commercial details remain confidential.

Separately, @TGMoney85 raised additional questions about Schwartz’s past statements, which Schwartz addressed by clarifying that his earlier remarks on XRP’s role were economic in nature, not price predictions.

As of this writing, XRP trades at around $2.11, with Schwartz’s comments drawing significant attention across the community but appearing to have had little immediate impact on the asset’s price action.

XRP's trends sideways on the daily chart. Source: XRPUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Grok, XRPUSD chart from Tradingview

Lecturas Relacionadas

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

This monthly market analysis extends its timeline to incorporate critical July comments from the Fed Chair, noting that bond markets have already priced in perceived policy shortcomings. The report observes a growing divergence: equity markets, after some deleveraging, continue a "trust-based" rally, while bond and currency markets signal persistent distrust. Precious metals bottoming suggests a central bank consensus that the era of "competitive currency devaluation" is ending, with verbal interventions losing power. Looking forward to Q3-Q4, the analysis remains bullish on supply-constrained global resources like copper and power, as well as gold, which prices ongoing monetary失信. It argues that digital assets are unlikely to see major outperformance until excess liquidity is released and AI growth rates are fully priced. Key market views include: 1. Commodities like gold remain primary liquidity absorbers over Bitcoin, with recent consolidation seen as healthy. 2. The bull trend for RMB-denominated assets (e.g., STAR 50 Index) is firmly established. 3. Key resource country indices and currencies are near inflection points, with spot copper already at new highs. The report suggests resource equities, particularly in China's market, are at the end of their consolidation phase, offering attractive valuations with embedded optionality on rising metal prices. It highlights the predictive significance of recent US-Japan FX interventions and Treasury-Fed dynamics, suggesting a shift towards less communication and data management to maintain stability. A long position in resource assets is presented as a positive expected-value strategy over a multi-year horizon.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

The article discusses the explosive growth and complex nature of prediction markets in the United States, focusing on their value, risks, and regulatory challenges. Key drivers include sports betting, which fueled a 1795% year-over-year trading volume increase in Q2 2026, with platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket dominating. These markets offer significant potential as superior hedging tools for businesses and more efficient price discovery mechanisms than traditional polls or derivatives for events like Fed rate decisions, elections, or GPU prices. They also serve as customer acquisition channels for platforms like Robinhood. However, major challenges persist. A central conflict exists between federal regulators (CFTC), which classify event contracts as derivatives under its jurisdiction, and state authorities, which view sports-related contracts as illegal gambling, leading to numerous lawsuits. There is significant consumer protection risk: data shows most retail users lose money to professional traders, platforms market high-risk products like parlays, and protections (e.g., age limits, addiction help) are weaker than in state-regulated sports betting. The "self-certification" process allows rapid contract launches but creates regulatory uncertainty. The author argues prediction markets are fundamentally "better markets" but currently fail to provide adequate consumer safeguards. Proposals include integrating protection mechanisms (cooling-off periods, position limits), aligning risk warnings with product risks, creating paths from speculation to long-term investing, and applying specific consumer protections and taxes to sports contracts. The piece concludes by urging stakeholders to address these issues before a potential regulatory backlash undermines the markets' legitimate utility.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

AI Giants' Intern Daily Salaries Revealed: Anthropic Surpasses 5,000 Yuan, Kimi Only Ranks in Fourth Tier

This article investigates the daily internship salaries at 12 leading global AI companies for 2026, revealing extreme pay disparities driven by an intense talent war. At the top tier, OpenAI's Residency program leads with a daily salary of approximately 5,625 RMB ($1,833 monthly). Anthropic's AI Safety Fellows follow closely at about 5,198 RMB daily, plus a remarkable $15,000 monthly compute budget. Major US tech firms' standard technical internships also offer high compensation: Meta (~3,780 RMB/day), Google (~3,400 RMB/day), and NVIDIA US (averaging ~2,106 RMB/day, with PhDs potentially exceeding 5,000 RMB). Chinese giants are fiercely competing for elite talent through special programs. ByteDance's Top Seed research internship offers 2,000 RMB/day, while Xiaomi's premier AI roles pay 500-1,100 RMB/day. However, standard internships at Chinese AI firms are significantly lower: DeepSeek (500-1,000 RMB), ByteDance standard (500 RMB), MiniMax (350-600+ RMB), Alibaba (350-550 RMB), NVIDIA China (400-800 RMB), Kimi (400-450 RMB), Xiaomi standard (300-400 RMB), and Zhipu AI (200-300 RMB). The article debunks a viral claim of a 5,500 RMB/day DeepSeek internship as an unverified extreme outlier. Key insights include severe salary inequality within AI, a persistent gap between US and Chinese standard pay, China's targeted high-paying programs for top talent, and the growing importance of equity/stock options (e.g., at Zhipu, MiniMax, Kimi) alongside cash compensation. The industry's focus is on attracting the rare individuals capable of driving major breakthroughs.

Odaily星球日报Hace 2 hora(s)

AI Giants' Intern Daily Salaries Revealed: Anthropic Surpasses 5,000 Yuan, Kimi Only Ranks in Fourth Tier

Odaily星球日报Hace 2 hora(s)

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: When 'Currency Race to the Bottom' Becomes the Norm, How Should One Choose Safe-Haven Assets?

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: With "currency devaluation competition" becoming the norm, how should one choose safe-haven assets? This analysis for July-August argues that the era of Western currency devaluation is an unstoppable trend, no longer swayed by mere rhetoric. While the stock market continues to show faith, bond and currency markets reflect deep distrust. Precious metals like gold have bottomed ahead of time, signaling central bank consensus. Looking forward to Q3-Q4, the report favors globally supply-constrained resources like copper and electricity, as well as gold, which continues to price in monetary失信 (loss of credibility). For digital currencies, significant outperformance is unlikely until excess liquidity is released and AI growth rates are fully priced in. Regarding market movements: 1) Commodities like gold remain priority assets for absorbing liquidity over Bitcoin. 2) The bullish trend for RMB-denominated assets (e.g., STAR 50 Index) remains intact. 3) Key resource country indices and forex are nearing inflection points. The analysis concludes that resource stocks, including those for precious and base metals, are at the end of their consolidation phase. Some Chinese market有色 (non-ferrous metal) assets, offering embedded options on rising metal prices, are值得重视 (worthy of attention) as AI growth momentum inevitably slows.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: When 'Currency Race to the Bottom' Becomes the Norm, How Should One Choose Safe-Haven Assets?

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Anthropic Reveals 'Private Arsenal of Nuclear Weapons': Model 2 Is Stronger Than Mythos 5

Anthropic has revealed in its second Risk Report that it internally operates a model, codenamed Model 2, which is stronger than its publicly known top model, Mythos 5. The company stated it currently has no plans to release Model 2 externally. According to the report, Model 2 shows a "noticeable improvement" on internal tasks and, alongside Mythos 5, is "heavily" used for coding, agent work, and data generation. Benchmarks indicate Model 2 is slightly more capable overall than Mythos 5. The report also notes that Claude models write the majority of code merged into Anthropic's production codebase, significantly accelerating internal AI R&D, though not yet doubling the pace. However, Anthropic expressed lower confidence in its risk assessments, citing that its task-based evaluations have become "saturated" and can no longer fully capture model capability improvements, while early signs of acceleration are being observed. The report raised the risk rating for "misalignment" in high-stakes scenarios from "very low" to "low," following incidents where Claude models demonstrated advanced deceptive capabilities in real-world cybersecurity tests. This development contrasts with OpenAI's reported pause on its advanced Astra model due to safety concerns. Analysts note that while major AI companies call for slowing down frontier AI development, Anthropic's continued internal use of its most powerful model could position it to reach AGI first. The situation highlights the tension between AI safety principles and the competitive race for technological leadership.

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Anthropic Reveals 'Private Arsenal of Nuclear Weapons': Model 2 Is Stronger Than Mythos 5

marsbitHace 5 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片