Former New York Mayor Involved in Rug Pull Allegations: On-Chain Investigation into NYC Token

marsbitPublicado a 2026-01-15Actualizado a 2026-01-15

Resumen

Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams faces allegations of a "rug pull" following the launch of the NYC token. Shortly after its debut on January 13, the token’s value plummeted over 80% when the liquidity pool creator address (9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt) removed approximately 2.377 million USDC just 30 minutes post-launch. This caused the token’s market cap to crash from a high of $600 million to under $100 million. Beosin’s on-chain analysis traced the initial funding to a Mayan bridge and Kraken. After the crash, the same address began making small purchases of NYC tokens, but the price only recovered to around $0.133. The address still holds 1.332 million USDC, resulting in an estimated profit of $330,000. Adams denied personal profit or involvement in removing funds. However, the analysis confirms liquidity manipulation, with only about $1 million returned to liquidity after $2.37 million was withdrawn. This incident highlights the significant risks associated with celebrity-backed tokens.

Author: Beosin

On January 13-14, former New York City Mayor Eric Adams faced significant scrutiny after the token he launched, NYC, experienced a sharp price drop shortly after its release. The Beosin security team conducted a detailed on-chain analysis of the incident and shares the findings below:

Event Overview

On January 13, Beijing time, former New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced the launch of the NYC token (token contract address: Ho5fkxk9uqUuVN5kt7TUFacduWCpKPAuYkM9HD3KAXA2) on social media. However, just 30 minutes after the token went live, the address that created the liquidity pool, 9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt, began removing liquidity:

https://solscan.io/account/9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt

This address removed approximately 2,377,376 USDC, causing the price of the NYC token to plummet by over 80%, and its market capitalization to shrink from a peak of $600 million to less than $100 million.

https://ave.ai/token/Ho5fkxk9uqUuVN5kt7TUFacduWCpKPAuYkM9HD3KAXA2-solana

On January 15, Adams continued to promote the NYC token by retweeting related posts and issued a statement through his representative, Todd Shapiro, claiming that he did not profit from the NYC token and did not withdraw any funds from it. However, the community remains skeptical.

On-Chain Data Analysis

Using BeosinTrace to analyze the Solana address 9Ty4M4t9MZArhJBKFWbYrzeqdMf2Ua5eHWSRW3LXKyGt, we obtained the following results regarding its on-chain activities.

1. On-Chain Activity Overview

The address 9Ty4M obtained 1,000,001 USDC from the Mayan cross-chain bridge and a Kraken user address, then created the NYC-USDC liquidity pool. After removing liquidity at 6:43 Beijing time on January 13, which caused the price to crash, the address 9Ty4M began making small purchases of NYC tokens starting at 16:15 on the same day, continuing to the present.

Further tracing of the cross-chain funds reveals that they originated from the Arbitrum address 0xBc985b167C5F3801B19E2Dec7082c2fcbBF07e91. Continuing the trace, it was found that 90% of these funds were withdrawn from Kraken, while 10% came from an unknown multi-chain active trading address, 0x276fbb81c8a7567ad2412469a549bd4dc82cab65.

2. Transaction Data Analysis

According to BeosinTrace data statistics, the address 9Ty4M has purchased 2,301,250 and 1,566,926 NYC tokens via the addresses FWuiWEdkcR1NLPjozcEuErtGGDZG5kyPu3oszmnF8uni and H7Lnoh82SZghsXmoqffoCiFz7U3D1cwZ8ZPjRUMU7fc5, respectively, on Jupiter. However, the price of NYC has only recovered to 0.133-0.134, with a total market capitalization of approximately $130 million.

Currently, the address 9Ty4M still holds 1,332,243.85 USDC. Excluding any gains from NYC tokens, this address has profited by approximately $330,000 due to the limited liquidity of the NYC token.

Conclusion

This celebrity token launch has once again sparked significant controversy. Token issuance itself involves risks related to compliance, technology, and fund security. The removal of liquidity, which led to a sharp decline in the token's price, has negatively impacted investors and the market.

The on-chain analysis using BeosinTrace confirms the existence of "liquidity manipulation" behavior. After withdrawing $2.37 million in liquidity, the issuer continued to make purchases but only returned approximately $1 million, with the remaining $1.33 million still held in the issuer's address. Users should enhance their security awareness and avoid trading such high-risk, easily manipulated tokens. Beosin will continue to monitor the token's liquidity situation and the fund movements of related addresses to safeguard users' funds.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main controversy surrounding former New York City Mayor Eric Adams and the NYC token?

AFormer NYC Mayor Eric Adams is facing controversy after the NYC token, which he promoted, experienced a price crash of over 80% shortly after launch. This occurred when the address that set up the liquidity pool removed approximately 2.38 million USDC, leading to accusations of a 'Rug Pull'.

QWhat on-chain evidence from BeosinTrace suggests a 'liquidity manipulation' in the NYC token incident?

ABeosinTrace analysis revealed that the address '9Ty4M...' removed liquidity worth about 2.38 million USDC 30 minutes after the token launch, causing the price to crash. Later, the same address began buying back NYC tokens in small amounts, but only returned approximately 1 million USDC worth of value, while 1.33 million USDC remained in their wallet, indicating a net withdrawal of funds.

QWhat was the source of the initial funds used to create the NYC token liquidity pool according to the investigation?

AThe investigation traced the initial 1,000,001 USDC used to create the liquidity pool. It originated from the Mayan cross-chain bridge and a Kraken user address. Further tracing showed these funds came from an Arbitrum address, with 90% withdrawn from Kraken and 10% from an unknown multi-chain active trading address.

QHow did Eric Adams and his spokesperson respond to the allegations regarding the NYC token?

AEric Adams continued to promote the NYC token after the incident. His spokesperson, Todd Shapiro, stated that Adams did not personally profit from the token and did not remove any funds from it, though the statement did not alleviate community skepticism.

QWhat is the current status of the address that removed the liquidity, and what is their estimated profit?

AThe address '9Ty4M...' still holds 1,332,243.85 USDC. After accounting for the value of the NYC tokens it bought back, the investigation estimates the address has a profit of approximately $330,000 from this activity.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Capital Flow Analysis Shows Ozak AI Absorbing Liquidity From BTC, ETH, and SOL During Market Pullbacks

Capital flow analysis indicates that during recent market pullbacks, liquidity is rotating from major cryptocurrencies like BTC, ETH, and SOL into Ozak AI, an early-stage AI project. Priced at $0.014, Ozak AI has raised over $6.8 million and sold more than 1.17 billion tokens in its presale, showing steady and sustained capital absorption rather than hype-driven spikes. Analysts describe this shift as strategic redeployment, not panic selling, driven by Ozak AI’s relative valuation efficiency, AI-native utility (including Prediction Agents and EigenLayer integration), and favorable risk-reward timing. The trend reflects a structural rotation into high-growth AI infrastructure projects during large-cap consolidation, with Ozak AI emerging as a preferred alternative for asymmetric returns.

TheNewsCryptoHace 3 min(s)

Capital Flow Analysis Shows Ozak AI Absorbing Liquidity From BTC, ETH, and SOL During Market Pullbacks

TheNewsCryptoHace 3 min(s)

DeFi Falls into the Most Dangerous Prisoner's Dilemma in History

ChainCatcher author Gu Yu analyzes the severe fallout from the Kelp DAO exploit, which has triggered a crisis of confidence across the DeFi ecosystem, implicating major projects like Aave, LayerZero, and Arbitrum. The attack, attributed to the Lazarus Group, exploited a single-validator (1/1) configuration in LayerZero’s decentralized verification network (DVN), leading to over $40M in losses. LayerZero’s official report claimed its protocol “operated as expected” and deflected blame onto Kelp DAO’s configuration choices, sparking backlash from developers and researchers who criticized its avoidance of responsibility. Meanwhile, Arbitrum’s security committee intervened by using a privileged transaction to freeze and recover ~30,766 ETH ($71M) from the hacker’s address—a move praised for pragmatism but criticized for undermining Layer2 decentralization ideals. The incident has intensified debates on cross-chain bridge security, Layer2 centralization risks, and the tension between practical security measures and decentralized principles. With Aave facing ~$200M in bad debt and no clear compensation plan from Kelp DAO or LayerZero, the situation reflects a dangerous “prisoner’s dilemma” where key players prioritize self-interest over collective trust, threatening foundational DeFi narratives.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

DeFi Falls into the Most Dangerous Prisoner's Dilemma in History

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Not Speculation but a Necessity: The 4 Unique Values of Prediction Markets

Polymarket's recent $4 billion funding round and soaring valuation of $15 billion highlight the explosive growth of prediction markets, with trading volume reaching $25.7 billion in March 2026—a 10.6% monthly increase. This analysis argues that prediction markets serve critical non-speculative functions, positioning them as essential tools rather than mere gambling platforms. Prediction markets offer four unique values: entertainment consumption, insurance-like protection, risk hedging, and truth discovery. Firstly, they stimulate economic activity by engaging users in event-based betting, similar to the broader sports industry. Secondly, they act as a form of decentralized insurance, allowing users to hedge against specific, well-defined risks (e.g., weather events) transparently and without traditional overhead costs. Thirdly, institutions and individuals use these markets to hedge against geopolitical and commodity price risks, as demonstrated during the U.S.-Iran conflict and the launch of 24/7 commodity markets on platforms like Kalshi. Finally, prediction markets counter media bias by aggregating crowd-sourced information, often achieving 30% higher accuracy than surveys due to users' vested interests. Experts like Bitwise’s Jeff Park and SIG’s Jeff Yass emphasize the markets' role in risk transfer and financial innovation. As these platforms evolve, they are poised to become trillion-dollar markets, offering more reliable, decentralized mechanisms for information pricing and risk management.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

Not Speculation but a Necessity: The 4 Unique Values of Prediction Markets

Polymarket's recent $4 billion funding round, valuing it at $15 billion, highlights the explosive growth of prediction markets, with trading volume surging from $8.7 billion to $25.7 billion in just a few months. This article argues that prediction markets are not merely speculative gambling platforms but serve four core functions. First, they act as a form of entertainment and consumption, stimulating economic activity similar to the sports industry. Second, they provide a form of limited insurance, allowing users to hedge against specific, well-defined risks (e.g., weather events) in a transparent, cost-effective manner without traditional insurance overhead. Third, they are powerful tools for risk hedging, enabling both individuals and institutions to mitigate exposure to volatile events like commodity price swings and geopolitical crises. Finally, prediction markets can function as "truth machines," aggregating crowd wisdom to counter media narratives and biases, with some claims suggesting a 30% higher accuracy over traditional surveys. The piece concludes that the role and potential value of prediction markets are far greater than commonly perceived, positioning them as a significant future market.

Odaily星球日报Hace 30 min(s)

Interview with Jeff Hoffman: How Web3 and AI Are Reshaping the Trillion-Dollar Social Travel Market

Interview with Jeff Hoffman: Web3 and AI Reshaping the Trillion-Dollar Social Travel Market Jeff Hoffman, co-founder of Priceline, discusses how Web3 and AI are transforming the social travel industry. He highlights that the current travel market is fragmented and inefficient, dominated by traditional online travel agencies (OTAs) that act as intermediaries with opaque models. Web3 introduces direct connections, transparency, and faster settlements, shifting value back to travelers. Key trends driving this change include demand for flexible rewards, digital payments, and trust in communities over ads. Hoffman joined Staynex not for its Web3 label, but because it addresses industry inefficiencies by integrating booking, payments, AI-driven itineraries, and rewards into a single ecosystem. This Web2.5 model combines Web2 scale with Web3 incentives. He emphasizes the team’s focus on execution over hype as a key reason for his involvement. Looking ahead, blockchain will enable transparent rewards and seamless cross-border payments, while AI provides personalization. Together, they will turn travel into a continuous relationship rather than a transaction. Hoffman predicts traditional OTAs will persist, but value will shift to platforms that own payment, loyalty, and community networks. Social travel represents a significant, underestimated opportunity in Web3.

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Interview with Jeff Hoffman: How Web3 and AI Are Reshaping the Trillion-Dollar Social Travel Market

marsbitHace 45 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros