Flow Foundation Seeks Court Order to Stop FLOW Token Delisting on South Korean Exchanges

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-09Actualizado a 2026-03-09

Resumen

Flow Foundation and Dapper Labs have filed a legal request with the Seoul Central District Court to halt the planned delisting of the FLOW token from major South Korean exchanges, including Upbit and Coinone. The delisting decision followed a December 2025 security exploit on the Flow blockchain, where an attacker duplicated tokens worth approximately $3.9 million. Although user funds were unaffected and validators quickly paused the network, exchanges proceeded with the delisting. The Foundation argues that FLOW continues to trade normally on global platforms like Binance and Coinbase, indicating its viability. The legal action aims to protect Korean investors and allow for further review, highlighting growing tensions between blockchain projects and exchanges after security incidents.

Flow Foundation and Dapper Labs have filed a legal request with the Seoul Central District Court to stop the planned delisting of the FLOW token from the South Korean crypto exchanges. The firms are asking the court to temporarily suspend the decision by the exchanges, including Upbit and Coinone, that announced the end of trading support for the token.

Reason behind the Delisting

The decision to delist came after the security exploit in the Flow blockchain in December 2025. During the incident, an attacker exploited a protocol vulnerability and was able to duplicate the token worth about $3.9 million. Later reports confirmed that the users’ balances and funds were not affected. Validators on the network quickly took action by pausing the blockchain and working with the exchanges to freeze.

Developers discussed several possibilities for recovery options after the attack, and one proposal was a full blockchain rollback, which would restore the network to a previous state before the exploit occurred. Critics warned that the rollback could create problems such as duplicate balances for users who have moved assets out of the network and financial losses for users who transfer assets into the network during that time. Instead of rolling back the entire chain, they implemented an isolated recovery plan, which involved identifying and destroying only the duplicate token.

Flow Foundation argues that the token continues to trade normally on the major global platforms, which include Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken. The foundation maintains that this indicates the project’s continued viability and suggests a reconsideration of the delisting decisions.

In the court filing, Flow Foundation states that the request to suspend the delisting is intended to protect Korean users and investors while the situation is fully reviewed. The firm said that it remains open to discussions with the exchanges to continue pursuing additional listings within South Korea. This legal challenge for the Flow Foundation shows that the growing tension between the blockchain projects and crypto exchanges is following security incidents.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Wall Street Expert Warns of 35% Stock Crash Amid US-Iran War

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat legal action have Flow Foundation and Dapper Labs taken regarding the FLOW token delisting in South Korea?

AFlow Foundation and Dapper Labs have filed a legal request with the Seoul Central District Court to stop the planned delisting of the FLOW token and to temporarily suspend the decision by the exchanges.

QWhat was the primary reason cited by South Korean exchanges for delisting the FLOW token?

AThe decision to delist came after a security exploit in the Flow blockchain in December 2025, where an attacker exploited a protocol vulnerability and duplicated tokens worth about $3.9 million.

QWhat alternative recovery plan was implemented instead of a full blockchain rollback after the exploit?

AInstead of a full rollback, they implemented an isolated recovery plan which involved identifying and destroying only the duplicate tokens.

QOn which major global exchanges does the FLOW token continue to trade normally, according to the Flow Foundation?

AThe FLOW token continues to trade normally on major global platforms including Binance, Coinbase, and Kraken.

QWhat is the stated goal of the Flow Foundation's legal challenge to the delisting?

AThe goal is to protect Korean users and investors while the situation is fully reviewed, and the foundation remains open to discussions with the exchanges for additional listings in South Korea.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Patrick Witt Delays Military Training to Lead White House Push for CLARITY Act

Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, has delayed his military training with the Georgia Army National Guard to lead White House negotiations on the CLARITY Act. With the Senate entering recess on August 8, this period is seen as crucial for advancing the bill, which aims to establish clear regulatory rules for the digital asset market in the United States. This marks the second time Witt has postponed his military service for this purpose. His role as the administration's lead negotiator has gained increased importance following the impending departure of Deputy Director Harry Jung, ensuring leadership continuity during critical legislative efforts. The White House is prioritizing the passage of this significant cryptocurrency regulation before the Senate break.

TheNewsCryptoHace 10 min(s)

Patrick Witt Delays Military Training to Lead White House Push for CLARITY Act

TheNewsCryptoHace 10 min(s)

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight NewsHace 24 min(s)

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight NewsHace 24 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHace 41 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar FLOW

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Flow (FLOW) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Flow (FLOW) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Flow (FLOW)Después de comprar tu Flow (FLOW), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Flow (FLOW)Tradear fácilmente con Flow (FLOW) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

270 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.12.10Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de FLOW (FLOW).