Federal Reserve quietly reverses anti-crypto stance with new policy

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-12-17Actualizado a 2025-12-17

Resumen

The Federal Reserve has reversed its restrictive 2023 policy on "novel activities" and replaced it with a new framework that creates a clear pathway for banks to engage in digital-asset and blockchain innovation. Announced on 17 December, the move adopts a "same activity, same risks, same regulation" philosophy, allowing banks to pursue crypto-related services like custody, tokenization, and stablecoin integration if they demonstrate strong risk management. The policy shift enables both insured and uninsured state member banks to apply for innovative activities, benefiting crypto-focused institutions. This marks a significant regulatory pivot from discouraging crypto engagement to encouraging responsible innovation under supervision, aligning with broader U.S. efforts to integrate blockchain into mainstream finance.

The Federal Reserve has withdrawn its restrictive 2023 policy on “novel activities” and replaced it with a new framework.

The new policy creates a clear pathway for banks to engage in digital-asset and blockchain innovation, marking one of the most significant regulatory pivots in years.

The move, announced on 17 December, reverses the Fed’s prior stance, which had limited state member banks to only those activities explicitly allowed for national banks.

The 2023 policy had served as a de facto barrier to crypto-related services, especially custody, tokenization, and stablecoin integrations. Its withdrawal signals a shift toward enabling responsible digital-asset activity within the U.S. banking system.

Fed removes 2023 restrictions and adopts innovation-friendly standard

Under the new policy statement, the Federal Reserve adopts a “same activity, same risks, same regulation” philosophy — a framework that allows banks to pursue new technologies as long as they demonstrate strong risk management and comply with supervisory expectations.

Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman described the new guidance as an effort to modernize the banking sector while maintaining safety and soundness.

“New technologies offer efficiencies to banks and improved products and services to bank customers,” Bowman said.

“By creating a pathway for responsible, innovative products and services, the Board is helping ensure that the banking sector remains safe and sound while also modern, efficient, and effective.”

The withdrawal of the 2023 guidance also removes the supplementary crypto-specific interpretations that strongly discouraged engagement with digital assets.

That change alone opens the door for supervised banks to revisit cryptocurrency custody, tokenization, blockchain settlement tools, and stablecoin integrations.

Clearer path for both insured and uninsured banks — including crypto-focused institutions

One of the most notable changes is that both insured and uninsured state member banks can now apply to conduct innovative activities, including those not yet permissible for national banks.

This has major implications for Wyoming SPDI-style institutions and trust banks focusing on digital assets.

The Fed states that uninsured banks may engage in a broader range of activities if they demonstrate adequate liquidity, loss-absorbing capacity, and credible resolution mechanisms.

The move follows the recent pilot program by the CFTC, and the OCC’s approval of trust charters for some crypto companies.

What this means for crypto adoption

This policy update does not give banks carte blanche to launch crypto products — but it finally replaces a restrictive framework with a risk-based approval system that encourages experimentation.

Banks seeking to custody crypto, settle tokenized assets, integrate stablecoins, or deploy blockchain rails now have:

  • A formal application path
  • Clarity on supervisory expectations
  • A regulatory environment that no longer assumes such activities are inherently unsafe

It’s a structural shift in tone — from “don’t engage with crypto” to “engage responsibly under supervision.”


Final Thoughts

  • The Federal Reserve’s withdrawal of its 2023 policy marks its clearest pro-innovation stance in years, opening the door for bank-led crypto adoption.
  • With the CFTC and OCC already advancing digital-asset frameworks, U.S. banking regulators are converging on a strategy that integrates blockchain into mainstream finance.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat did the Federal Reserve do with its 2023 policy on 'novel activities'?

AThe Federal Reserve withdrew its restrictive 2023 policy and replaced it with a new framework that creates a clear pathway for banks to engage in digital-asset and blockchain innovation.

QWhat is the core regulatory philosophy adopted in the new Federal Reserve policy?

AThe new policy adopts a 'same activity, same risks, same regulation' philosophy, allowing banks to pursue new technologies if they demonstrate strong risk management and comply with supervisory expectations.

QAccording to the article, what specific crypto-related services are now more accessible to banks under the new policy?

AThe new framework opens the door for supervised banks to revisit cryptocurrency custody, tokenization, blockchain settlement tools, and stablecoin integrations.

QHow does the new policy affect both insured and uninsured state member banks?

ABoth insured and uninsured state member banks can now apply to conduct innovative activities, including those not yet permissible for national banks, provided they demonstrate adequate risk management.

QWhat broader regulatory trend does this Federal Reserve move represent alongside actions from the CFTC and OCC?

AThis move indicates that U.S. banking regulators are converging on a strategy to integrate blockchain into mainstream finance, following the CFTC's pilot program and the OCC's approval of trust charters for crypto companies.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHace 53 min(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片