Fed Officials: The Current Choice Is Between Patience and Interest Rate Hikes; Inflation Is Top Economic Risk, AI Not Impactful Currently

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-05Actualizado a 2026-06-05

Resumen

Fed officials sent hawkish signals on inflation and interest rates. Key officials emphasized that the central bank's current choice is between maintaining patience and considering rate hikes to combat stubbornly high inflation, which they identified as the top economic risk. Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid explicitly placed rate hikes on the table, while San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly stated policy is in a good place but the Fed is prepared to move in "either direction," cautioning that forward guidance could be misleading amid high uncertainty. Market pricing now reflects a significant chance of a rate increase this year. Regarding AI, officials noted it is currently neither raising nor lowering inflation and has not yet delivered widespread productivity gains at a macroeconomic level. While AI could become a disinflationary force over a five-to-ten-year horizon, it is not an immediate factor for near-term monetary policy decisions. The next FOMC meeting in June is widely expected to leave rates unchanged. Officials also observed that the labor market appears balanced and is showing signs of stabilizing.

Author: Li Dan

Source: Wall Street News

Federal Reserve officials made concentrated remarks on Thursday, April 4th, Eastern US time. Three regional Fed presidents sent relatively hawkish signals regarding the path of inflation and interest rates. They indicated that the core dilemma currently facing the Fed is choosing between maintaining patience by keeping rates steady or proactively raising interest rates to suppress persistently high inflation. One official explicitly stated that AI is currently neither pushing inflation higher nor lowering it, having limited impact on short-term monetary policy decisions.

Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid bluntly stated that inflation is the top risk facing the US economy and, for the first time publicly, included interest rate hikes in policy discussions, omitting any mention of rate cuts.

San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly noted that monetary policy is currently in a reasonable position, but economic uncertainty is too high, and providing forward guidance could potentially mislead markets. The Fed is prepared to "respond in both directions." Market interest rate futures indicate that investors now perceive the probability of a rate hike within the year as having risen to a relatively high level.

The Fed is scheduled to hold its next monetary policy meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting, on June 16-17. This will be the first FOMC meeting chaired by the new Fed Chair, Kevin Warsh, and the market widely expects the policy rate to be held steady at that time.

Both Daly and Richmond Fed President Thomas Barkin, who also spoke on Thursday, have FOMC voting rights next year and in 2027, while Schmid is a voting member in the following year, 2028. Therefore, their statements are receiving significant market attention.

Schmid: Rate Hike Option is on the Table, Considering Whether Inflation is Temporary

Schmid was direct in his remarks at an economic forum in Oklahoma on Thursday, explicitly putting rate hikes on the table as an option.

He said: "The big question now is, do we remain patient? Our inflation numbers may have climbed to around 3.5%, no one likes that number. Is it temporary... or should we take action? Should we say, okay, it's time to raise rates 25 or 50 basis points and see if we can push it down?"

Schmid's comments reflect deepening concern within the Fed about the persistence of inflation. Previously, Fed officials generally believed that inflation driven by tariffs and oil prices would naturally subside over time, but this assessment is now facing challenges. According to Reuters, the Fed's policy rate has been held in the 3.5% to 3.75% range since last December, while inflation has remained above the 2% policy target for over five consecutive years.

Schmid made no mention of the possibility of rate cuts throughout his remarks. This stands in stark contrast to the stance at the beginning of the year when most officials considered rate cuts the baseline scenario. He emphasized that the 2% inflation target facilitates clear communication, and the Fed should not be ambiguous on this issue, "should not let that message become fuzzy."

Daly: Prepared to Respond in Both Directions, Forward Guidance Could Be Misleading

Speaking at the Bloomberg Tech Conference in San Francisco on Thursday, Daly said monetary policy is currently in a good place, but economic uncertainty is too high to provide clear guidance on the direction of interest rates.

She said: "We are prepared to respond in both directions on rates, no matter how the economy evolves. I think providing more forward guidance at this point could ultimately be misleading because we have to wait for the economic picture to evolve."

On inflation, Daly noted that the Fed's preferred inflation gauge rose 3.8% year-over-year in April, the largest increase since 2023. She attributed the main drivers of current inflation to tariffs, as well as rising energy and food prices following the outbreak of the Iran war—persistently rising oil prices have spread to prices of goods like fertilizer and equipment. Regarding the job market, she mentioned the current unemployment rate is 4.3%, with the labor market showing signs of stabilization.

Daly stated that as the economic situation develops, more officials are leaning towards the Fed making it clear that all options, including both rate cuts and hikes, are under consideration. According to federal funds futures contracts, investors currently see a higher likelihood of a rate hike within the year.

Daly: AI Could Lower Inflation in Five to Ten Years, No Widespread Productivity Boost Seen Currently

Addressing the widely discussed impact of AI on the economy, Daly stated that AI is currently neither a factor pushing inflation higher nor has it manifested widespread productivity gains at the macroeconomic data level.

She said, "We have not yet seen a widespread productivity boost," and the return on business investment in AI "remains to be realized," but business enthusiasm for the technology is "pretty strong."

According to reports, Daly believes that within a five-to-ten-year timeframe, AI has the potential to be a force lowering inflation. However, for monetary policy operating on a 12-month horizon, this AI effect is "not a pressing issue."

She also pointed out that currently, generative AI is primarily used to assist workers rather than replace them. Whether AI-driven productivity gains ultimately bring about deflationary effects depends crucially on timing.

Daly expressed optimism about AI, expecting 2027 to be a "litmus test" year for the AI industry.

Barkin: Job Market Balanced, No Signs of Labor Shortage Tension

Speaking after an event in Loudoun County, Virginia, on Thursday, Barkin said the U.S. labor market is currently in a balanced state, with no significant increase in overall labor demand.

He said, "I'm not seeing any change in the job market," noting signs of rising demand in technical occupations and healthcare, but overall, the job market is not tight.

Barkin stated that in conversations with employers, "I'm not hearing the kind of concerns I would call frothy, tight." This assessment aligns with Schmid's view that the overall economy is performing well and with Daly's mention of labor market stabilization, further supporting the Fed's current stance of holding steady and awaiting more data.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two main policy options facing the Federal Reserve according to the article?

AThe Federal Reserve is currently facing the core choice of either keeping patient and holding interest rates steady, or proactively raising interest rates to combat stubbornly high inflation.

QAccording to Kansas City Fed President Schmid, what is the number one risk to the U.S. economy?

AKansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid stated that inflation is the number one risk currently facing the U.S. economy.

QWhy does San Francisco Fed President Daly suggest that providing forward guidance might be misleading now?

ASan Francisco Fed President Mary Daly suggests that providing forward guidance on interest rates might be misleading because economic uncertainty is too high, and the Fed needs to wait for how the economic situation evolves.

QWhat is the article's view on AI's current impact on inflation and monetary policy?

AThe article, citing Fed officials, states that AI is currently neither pushing up nor lowering inflation, and it has not yet led to widespread productivity gains. Therefore, its effect is not an urgent issue for monetary policy decisions, which operate on a roughly 12-month cycle.

QWhat is the market's expectation for the upcoming FOMC meeting in June regarding the policy rate?

AThe market generally expects the Federal Reserve to keep the policy interest rate unchanged at the upcoming FOMC meeting in June.

Lecturas Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片