Everything Protocol Aims to Unify Liquidity, Lending, and Perpetual Trading in DeFi

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2025-12-17Actualizado a 2025-12-17

Resumen

Everything Protocol, an evolution of the SMARDEX infrastructure, is a unified DeFi system integrating a DEX, lending market, and perpetual trading into a single smart contract. It operates via a unified liquidity pool, enabling users to perform swaps, leveraged trading, and borrowing within a single pair. The protocol uses an oracle-less leverage engine for atomic transactions and a tick-based borrowing model to minimize bad debt. Scheduled for release in February 2026, Everything overlays permissionless lending onto the traditional AMM model to improve capital efficiency. It features a shared vault that repurposes idle collateral for external yield, and allows borrowing against any trading pair. A partnership with USDNr provides liquidity providers with an additional yield source. The system aims to reduce reliance on oracles, enhance liquidity use, and ensure price stability through virtual reserves. A deterministic, tick-based liquidation system avoids the need for insurance funds. A future upgrade, "Geneve," planned for mid-2026, will introduce yield-bearing collateral and native limit orders to achieve 100% capital efficiency.

At the moment, SMARDEX is in the process of transforming its DeFi infrastructure into Everything, which is a unified protocol that integrates the capabilities of a DEX, lending market, and perpetual type trading system into a single smart contract.

Everything is organized around a single smart contract and a single unified liquidity pool, which is the medium via which all actions including leveraged trading, borrowing, and AMM swaps are carried out. Users are able to engage with all of the key operations inside a single pair, while the oracle-less leverage engine executes transactions in an atomic manner and the tick-based borrowing model restricts bad debt by imposing set collateral requirements.

“Our goal with Everything is not only to improve DeFi mechanics but to redefine how teams build financial infrastructure on chain,” said Jean Rausis, founder of Everything. “We designed this protocol so new projects can launch markets, liquidity layers, and financial primitives without relying on fragile and fragmented integrations. This shift from SMARDEX to Everything provides a foundation that supports real scale, long term stability, and products the previous architecture could not support.”

Everything, which was conceived as a go-to system for on-chain liquidity management and is slated to be released in February 2026, is a system that overlays permissionless lending and borrowing on top of the traditional xy = k paradigm. This transforms fragmented DeFi interactions into a framework that prioritizes capital efficiency.

Everything makes it possible to borrow from any pair that is offered on the platform. Through the use of a shared vault, collateral that has not been used is repurposed, and the contract deploys it into authorized external yield methods. In spite of the fact that loans continue to be over-collateralized and have predictable interest mechanisms, useful collateral may help cut the costs of borrowing funds. The provision of liquidity is open to anybody, since pools are permissionless.

Through unconcentrated liquidity, traditional AMMs often fail to make full use of their reserves, while more recent designs increase complexity without providing a wide range of flexibility.

Through the integration of AMM operations, financing, and everlasting style trading inside a single self-balancing system, everything successfully tackles the issue of fragmentation. After forming a partnership with USDNr, a decentralized synthetic stable asset that offers a sustainable yield of roughly 16 percent annual percentage rate (APR), liquidity providers are able to obtain access to an additional source of returns. These returns are generated in addition to swap fees, borrowing interest, ‘funding rates,’ and liquidation penalties.

The goal of Everything is to decrease dependence on price oracles, improve the use of liquidity, and lessen the likelihood of bad debt. Price stability is achieved by the use of virtual reserves, which also enable the AMM to function as a reliable baseline for lending and perps. Deterministic results are provided by a tick-based liquidation system, which does not need insurance funds or auto deleveraging. This method also maintains positions that are solvent and optimum.

It is anticipated that the Everything “Geneve” improvement will be implemented around the summer of 2026. This upgrade will include the addition of yield-bearing collateral in addition to native limit and take profit order liquidity. This will introduce yield into the core of the system and improve efficiency across the board. This upgrade will incorporate a cutting-edge feature that will create yield for all orders that are now sitting idle, so achieving a capital efficiency rate of one hundred percent.

Within the framework of a single smart contract architecture, everything is a unified DeFi protocol that includes Automated Market Making, lending, borrowing, and everlasting style trading. The system, which was developed as an extension of the SMARDEX infrastructure, presents a consolidated liquidity model in which numerous market functions are powered by a single pool. A tick-based liquidity architecture, oracle-less leverage execution, and deterministic liquidation mechanisms are used by everything in order to enhance capital efficiency and decrease systemic risk. The protocol is intended to facilitate the formation of permissionless markets, provide multisource yield for liquidity providers, and serve as a basis for the development of simplified on-chain financial infrastructure. Through the implementation of a roadmap of features that increase the earning potential of collateral, orders, and pooled assets, Everything intends to improve the liquidity efficiency throughout the DeFi ecosystem.

TagsAltcoinBlockchain

Lecturas Relacionadas

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Title: Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate A new technical proposal, BIP-110 (Reduced Data Temporary Softfork), has sparked a fundamental governance debate within the Bitcoin community. It aims to impose new consensus rules for one year to limit non-financial data (like inscriptions and Runes) on-chain, moving beyond simple node and miner policy filters to invalidate currently valid transactions. Supporters argue that default policies have failed due to workarounds, necessitating consensus-layer changes to protect Bitcoin's core monetary function from data spam. Critics, including Michael Saylor and Adam Back, contend this dangerously centralizes judgment, undermines permissionlessness, and sets a risky governance precedent. They advocate for market-based solutions like fees or Layer 2s instead. The debate exposes deeper tensions: miners are divided on activation; node operators assert their sovereignty; Bitcoin Core developers influence defaults without direct accountability; and large corporate holders like MicroStrategy now wield narrative influence. Technically, BIP-110 may not fully block data and carries a disclosed consensus bug risk. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a stress test, forcing the community to confront the unresolved question: who legitimately decides what Bitcoin is and how it evolves, amidst competing claims from miners, nodes, developers, and capital holders.

链捕手Hace 23 min(s)

Who Decides Bitcoin's Rules? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

链捕手Hace 23 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, has launched a new full node software called Zakura version 1.0.0. Developed by Zcash co-founder Sean Bowe and Dev Ojha, with private ZEC donations, its goal is to enable Zcash to process over 50,000 transactions per second (TPS)—matching the scale of Visa and Mastercard—while maintaining full transaction privacy and verifiability. This addresses a key bottleneck, as Zcash currently handles only about 1 private transaction per second. Zakura is a fork of the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node. It features chain pruning and snapshots, reducing disk usage and allowing new nodes to sync in under two minutes. It also offers compatibility with the legacy `zcashd` client interface. The scalability challenge stems from the large data size of privacy proofs. Bowe's Tachyon project aims to use recursive proofs to reduce consensus-layer data needs from ~500 MB/s to ~100 MB/s. For wallet scalability, Valar Group is researching Private Information Retrieval (PIR) tech to allow wallets to fetch their data privately. Zakura supports fast block propagation and the upcoming "Ironwood" network upgrade (NU6.3), scheduled for activation around July 28th. Ironwood was created to contain a critical inflation bug discovered in the Orchard shielded pool in May 2024. The fix uses "turnstiles" to trap any counterfeit ZEC created during the vulnerability period within the shielded pool, preventing it from entering circulation and restoring supply integrity.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Zcash's New Node Zakura Goes Live: Privacy Payments Can Reach 50,000 TPS, Aiming to Rival Visa and Mastercard

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

Title: Wall Street Sees Kimi K3 as a Catalyst for Compute Demand, Not a "DeepSeek Moment 2.0" Summary: Following the release of Moonshot AI's powerful open-source model Kimi K3, initial market reaction mirrored the "DeepSeek moment" that sparked a sell-off in compute stocks earlier in 2025, fearing reduced demand for AI infrastructure. However, major Wall Street banks including UBS, Nomura, BofA, and Citi argue the opposite: K3 will accelerate, not weaken, demand for compute, memory, storage, and networking. Their analysis centers on K3's specifications—2.8 trillion parameters, 1M token context, and MoE architecture—which represent a "scale" story rather than a pure "efficiency" one like DeepSeek R1. These features increase pressure on inference, memory (especially KV cache), and storage. Analysts invoke Jevons Paradox: as high-quality models become more affordable (K3 is cheaper than top closed models but not the cheapest), usage and token volumes expand, ultimately increasing total compute consumption. The reports highlight that competition will force leading US AI labs (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) to invest more in training and iteration to maintain their edge. Furthermore, the rise of capable open-source models like K3 is expanding the global AI developer ecosystem, with Chinese models now accounting for over 45% of developer traffic. Key beneficiaries identified across the AI infrastructure chain include memory/storage players (e.g., Micron, Samsung), compute leaders (Nvidia, TSMC), networking suppliers (due to "super-node" cluster needs for deploying K3), and cloud platforms (e.g., Alibaba) that host diverse model ecosystems. The consensus is that stronger open-source models are an entry point for the next wave of infrastructure demand diffusion, provided workload growth outpaces efficiency gains.

链捕手Hace 41 min(s)

Replicating the "DeepSeek Moment"? Wall Street Unanimously Says: Kimi K3 Instead Strengthens Computing Power Demand

链捕手Hace 41 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片