Even Satoshi Nakamoto Would Kowtow to the God of Wealth

marsbitPublicado a 2025-12-25Actualizado a 2025-12-25

Resumen

The article humorously explores the growing trend of integrating traditional Chinese mysticism, such as fortune-telling and feng shui, into the cryptocurrency world. It begins with the author’s visit to a temple during the Chinese New Year, where they observe well-known crypto influencers and traders—often vocal about decentralization—engaging in superstitious rituals like burning incense and praying for wealth. The piece highlights how practices like astrological analysis of Bitcoin (e.g., predicting a difficult period in 2026 based on elemental cycles) and judging founders by their facial features have become part of crypto culture. Examples include a venture capital firm considering "face reading" as due diligence and a listed company CEO whose devotion to feng shui reportedly contributed to massive Bitcoin gains. The author argues that this turn to mysticism isn’t merely superstition but a psychological response to extreme market volatility. Like ancient maritime cultures relying on deities for safety in unpredictable seas, crypto participants use these beliefs as mental anchors amid chaotic price swings influenced by tweets and macros. Ultimately, when assets can swing 50% in a day, faith in something beyond charts becomes a way to cope.

Author: Xiaobing, Deep Tide TechFlow

Every year on the fifth day of the Lunar New Year, Xiaobing wakes up early to visit the Temple of the God of Wealth at Beigao Peak in Hangzhou.

I thought I would be jostling with aunties and uncles, but when I arrived, the scene was filled with familiar faces amidst the swirling incense smoke.

To my left was a well-known爆料KOL, to my right were community builders of pyramid schemes, and a few tech elites who usually preach "decentralization" were devoutly kowtowing with loud thuds. At that moment, no algorithmic consensus or Federal Reserve moves could compare to the three sticks of incense in their hands.

Over the past two years, mysticism has become the "mainstream" in the crypto world. If you’re still looking at K-line charts, you’re a classical韭菜 (dumb money). The real veterans are now reading八字 (fortune-telling based on birth dates).

A crypto trader familiar with various indicators eventually turned to mysticism and recently calculated Bitcoin’s八字. The result was grim: Fire clashes with the wealth vault, making 2026 (the Year of the Fire Horse) Bitcoin’s darkest hour. I quickly checked my wallet—thankfully, it was already empty.

As Alen, a partner at crypto VC y2z Ventures, once bluntly stated, one of their fund’s core competencies is "reading faces." Due diligence used to focus on code audits and business models, but now it’s different. First, they check if the founder has a "wealth-draining face," then they assess whether the project’s name clashes with风水 (geomancy).

During a recent trip to Shenzhen, I noticed that traders and KOLs’ standard accessory isn’t a data terminal—it’s a "feng shui consultant" standing behind them.

Don’t laugh—this approach actually works in the crypto world. Xiaobing knows a listed company boss in Hong Kong who is a devout believer in feng shui, donating more to temples than his company spends on R&D.

And the result? Feng shui brought him noble support. He started buying Bitcoin in 2023, made hundreds of millions by hoarding it, and later rode the wave of DAT (Crypto Treasury Reserve) narratives, doubling his company’s stock price... While everyone knows this is "survivorship bias," you can’t argue with the fact that he got rich.

There are counterexamples too. A爆料KOL with a frog avatar also had a feng shui consultant who advised him not to trade recently, but he couldn’t resist playing with contracts and got liquidated neatly.

This isn’t entirely superstition.

Our traditional land-based civilization emphasizes farming—"sow one seed in spring, reap ten thousand grains in autumn"—all about certainty. But what do ocean-based civilizations face? Storms and unknown waters.

Why do people in southeastern coastal areas worship Mazu? Not because they’re ignorant, but because on the vast, unpredictable sea, besides experience and technology, you need something else.

The crypto world is essentially a modern version of the "Age of Exploration." It faces bottomless depths and sudden storms. Humans are like this: the greater the randomness and volatility, the more we seek supernatural anchors.

When K-line charts fail, and a single tweet from Elon Musk, Donald Trump, or CZ can sway the market, feng shui becomes the last psychological防线. This isn’t ignorance—it’s an instinctive应激反应 to massive wealth fluctuations.

After all, when your assets can swing 50% in a day, you need to believe in something to sleep at night. Does it matter if the God of Wealth understands blockchain?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main theme of the article regarding the crypto community's behavior?

AThe article highlights that mysticism and fortune-telling, such as consulting feng shui masters and analyzing birth charts, have become prevalent in the crypto community as a psychological coping mechanism against extreme market volatility and uncertainty.

QHow does the article contrast traditional land-based civilizations with maritime civilizations in the context of belief systems?

AIt explains that land-based civilizations emphasize certainty and predictability (like farming cycles), while maritime civilizations, facing unpredictable storms and unknowns, turn to supernatural beliefs (e.g., worshipping Mazu) for psychological anchoring—similar to how crypto traders use mysticism amid market chaos.

QWhat example does the article give to show the effectiveness of feng shui in crypto success?

AIt cites a Hong Kong-listed company boss who devoutly donated to temples and followed feng shui advice, leading to massive profits from Bitcoin investments and a surge in his company's stock during the DAT narrative wave, though it acknowledges survivorship bias.

QWhat negative example is provided about ignoring mystical advice in the crypto space?

AA frog-avatar KOL ignored his feng shui advisor's warning to avoid trading and subsequently lost everything through contract trading, illustrating the consequences of disregarding such guidance.

QWhy does the article argue that crypto participants turn to superstition despite technological expertise?

ABecause the crypto market's extreme randomness, influenced by factors like celebrity tweets and unpredictable events, renders traditional analysis (e.g., charts) ineffective, leading people to seek supernatural beliefs as a mental safeguard to cope with stress and sleep better.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 8 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片