European Blockchain Convention returns to Barcelona as institutional capital moves to the centre of the digital asset market

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-11Actualizado a 2026-06-11

Resumen

The European Blockchain Convention (EBC) returns to Barcelona for its 12th edition on 16–17 September 2026. With institutional capital now central to the digital asset market following ETF approvals and MiCA regulation, the event focuses on execution—identifying the platforms and infrastructure that will define the next institutional layer. EBC12 will convene over 6,000 attendees, including firms like BlackRock and Bitwise, for discussions on regulatory convergence, institutional capital allocation, tokenization of real-world assets, stablecoins, and the role of AI. Positioned as Europe's Digital Asset Marketplace, EBC facilitates crucial pan-European dialogue among asset managers, banks, and policymakers in a fragmented regional landscape.

The question facing the digital asset industry is no longer one of legitimacy. After the approval of spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, the rollout of MiCA across the European Union, and growing allocations from asset managers and pension funds, institutions are in the market. The question now is one of execution — which platforms, counterparties and infrastructure will define the institutional layer of what comes next.

It is in that context that the European Blockchain Convention (EBC) will return to Barcelona on 16–17 September 2026 for its 12th edition — bringing together over 6,000 attendees from 70+ countries across two days of market intelligence, meetings and commercial momentum. Join the 12th edition with institutions like BlackRock, Cardano, Bitwise, Baillie Gifford, WisdomTree, Hilbert Capital, Zodia Custody, Midchains, and Caisse des Depots among others.

"EBC is built around a simple idea: when the right people are in the room, progress happens faster. In a market as fragmented as Europe's digital asset landscape, that matters."— Victoria Gago, Co-CEO, European Blockchain Convention

INSTITUTIONS AT THE CENTRE — SINCE THE BEGINNING

While the industry's narrative around institutional adoption has accelerated sharply over the past 18 months, EBC's focus on that audience predates the trend. From its firstedition, EBC was designed not around retail participation or token launches, but around the decision-makers who control capital at scale: asset managers, banks, infrastructure providers, exchanges and the policymakers shaping the rules they operate under.

Europe compounds the challenge. It is not one market — it is a region of parallel conversations, different regulatory timelines and different capital pools across London, Paris, Frankfurt, Zurich and Barcelona. EBC's positioning as Europe's Digital Asset Marketplace reflects a structural reality: the market needs a place where those conversations converge. Over 12 editions, it has become that place.

EBC12: THE AGENDA

The programme spans the issues that define institutional participation in digital assets today: regulatory convergence and market structure across major jurisdictions; capital allocation strategy from sovereign funds to private banks; the infrastructure required for institutional-grade operations; the rise of real-world asset tokenisation; stablecoin and CBDC dynamics as settlement infrastructure; and the role of AI in reshaping market intelligence and execution.

"What makes EBC valuable is not scale for the sake of scale. It is the concentration of the right market participants in one place — decision-makers, operators, investors and infrastructure leaders — with enough relevance and intent to make the time count."— Victoria Gago, Co-CEO, European Blockchain Convention

ABOUT EBC

The European Blockchain Convention (EBC) is the Europe's Digital Asset Marketplace — the pan-European event where institutions, capital allocators, infrastructure providers and policymakers converge. Now in its 12th edition, EBC has established itself as the commercial centre of the European digital asset market.

Registration is open at

https://eblockchainconvention.com/european-blockchain-convention-12/

Press contact: [email protected]

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main theme of the 12th European Blockchain Convention in Barcelona?

AThe main theme is the central role of institutional capital in the digital asset market, focusing on execution, the platforms, counterparties, and infrastructure that will define the institutional layer moving forward.

QAccording to the article, what distinguishes EBC's focus from other industry events?

AEBC has focused on institutional decision-makers, capital allocators, and policymakers from its beginning, rather than retail participation or token launches, positioning it as a convergence point for Europe's fragmented digital asset landscape.

QWhich key topics are covered in the agenda for EBC12?

AThe agenda covers regulatory convergence, institutional capital allocation strategies, institutional-grade infrastructure, real-world asset tokenization, stablecoin/CBDC dynamics for settlement, and the role of AI in market intelligence and execution.

QWhy is EBC particularly significant for the European market, according to the article?

AEurope is a fragmented region with parallel conversations and different regulations across financial hubs. EBC serves as Europe's Digital Asset Marketplace, providing a necessary central place for these conversations to converge and drive commercial momentum.

QHow does Victoria Gago, Co-CEO of EBC, describe the value proposition of the convention?

AShe states that EBC's value is not just scale, but the concentration of the right market participants—decision-makers, operators, investors, and infrastructure leaders—with enough relevance and intent to make meaningful progress happen faster.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 27 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 36 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片