eToro Reports Strong Q1 Profit Growth Despite Crypto Trading Slump

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-05-13Actualizado a 2026-05-13

Resumen

eToro reported strong Q1 profit growth despite a downturn in cryptocurrency trading. Net income rose 37% year-over-year to $82 million, driven largely by a nearly 400% surge in commodities trading volume, which accounted for about 60% of trading commissions. Key metrics also showed growth: net contribution increased 19% to $258 million, adjusted EBITDA grew 35% to $109 million, and assets under management climbed 15% to $17 billion. While commodities thrived, crypto activity declined. The number of crypto trades fell 32% year-over-year in April, with the average investment per trade dropping 22%. To bolster its offerings, eToro launched an AI-powered "Agent Portfolios" feature and enhanced its AI agent, Tori, with Grok 4.2 market sentiment analysis. The company also expanded by activating its BitLicense for New York crypto trading, adding Japanese equities, and finalizing the acquisition of self-custody wallet provider Zengo. By late April, total assets under management had risen further to $18.7 billion.

With a 37% year-over-year increase in net income to $82 million, EToro was able to weather a dip in cryptocurrency activity thanks to a spike in commodities trading.

On Tuesday, the business said that its net income increased 37% year-over-year to $82 million, up from $60 million in the first quarter of 2025. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or adjusted EBITDA, increased by 35% to $109 million from $80 million the previous year, while net contribution increased by 19% to $258 million.

Nearly 400% Surge in Commodities Trading

Commodities trading, which increased volumes by almost 400% year-over-year, was the primary driver of the positive performance, accounting for around 60% of trading commissions in the quarter. The business has activated its BitLicense to commence crypto trading in New York and extended its equities offering to include Japanese companies, bringing its exchange coverage to 26.

A total of 4.02 million funded accounts increased by 12%, while assets under management increased by 15%, reaching $17 billion. As of the 31st of March, the firm’s cash and short-term investments totaled $1.3 billion.

Crypto volumes fell even as commodities trade surged. In April, with the profits, statistics indicated that there were two million trades using cryptocurrencies, a 32% year-over-year decline, and a 22% decline in the amount invested per trade, to $207.

On the product side, eToro introduced an Agent Portfolios feature driven by AI and strengthened its cooperation with xAI. Tori, their AI investing agent, now incorporates market sentiment powered by Grok 4.2.

Additionally, on April 30, the business finalized its purchase of Zengo, a supplier of self-custodial crypto wallets. CEO Yoni Assia said that this move furthers eToro’s aim of connecting conventional finance with on-chain infrastructure. April saw total money transfers reach $1.4 billion, an increase of 53% year-over-year, while assets under management continued their ascent to $18.7 billion, an increase of 19% year-over-year.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Bhutan’s GMC Launches Fast-Track Licensing for Global Financial Firms

TagseToroexchange

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the year-over-year percentage increase in eToro's Q1 net income and what was the total amount?

AeToro's net income increased by 37% year-over-year to a total of $82 million in Q1.

QWhat specific type of trading activity offset the decline in cryptocurrency trading volume at eToro?

AA nearly 400% surge in commodities trading activity offset the decline in cryptocurrency trading volume, accounting for around 60% of trading commissions for the quarter.

QHow did the number of cryptocurrency trades and the average investment per trade change in April compared to the previous year?

AIn April, the number of cryptocurrency trades declined by 32% year-over-year to two million, and the average amount invested per trade fell by 22% to $207.

QWhat two recent developments did eToro mention regarding its product offerings and AI capabilities?

AeToro introduced an AI-driven Agent Portfolios feature and enhanced its AI investing agent, Tori, by integrating market sentiment analysis powered by Grok 4.2 through its partnership with xAI.

QWhat strategic acquisition did eToro finalize at the end of April and what was its stated purpose?

AeToro finalized the acquisition of Zengo, a self-custodial crypto wallet provider, to further its goal of connecting traditional finance with on-chain infrastructure.

Lecturas Relacionadas

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbitHace 1 min(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手Hace 24 min(s)

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手Hace 24 min(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片