Ethena [ENA] surges 10% as whales step in – Yet THIS remains real test

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-03-02Actualizado a 2026-03-02

Resumen

ENA surged nearly 10% in 24 hours, rebounding from repeated defenses of the $0.10 support level. Aggregated Open Interest rose to $110.5 million, indicating renewed derivatives activity. Whale orders increased during price dips, suggesting accumulation near support. Price stability above $0.10 is key; a break above $0.13 could shift momentum, while losing $0.10 may renew downside risk. Continuation depends on sustained spot volume and broader market conditions.

Ethena’s ENA token gained nearly 10% over the past 24 hours as buyers stepped in near key support. The move followed renewed positioning amid broader market uncertainty.

Daily data showed ENA traded around $0.1036 on the 1st of March, after bouncing from sub-$0.10 lows. That recovery drew fresh derivatives participation.

That shift set up a closer look at positioning metrics.

ENA’s Open Interest climbs

Ethena’s [ENA] Aggregated Open Interest rose to approximately $110.5 million, according to Coinalyze data. The chart showed a modest uptick alongside price stabilization.

Rising Open Interest during a rebound typically indicated fresh capital entering positions. In this case, the increase remained controlled rather than explosive.

Even so, the structure suggested traders reopened exposure near local support.

That left attention on order flow behavior.

Whale activity resurfaces

CryptoQuant’s Spot Average Order Size data showed periodic spikes in larger orders. Big whale orders appeared during recent price dips.

Such behavior often reflected accumulation during weakness. Larger participants typically stepped in before broader momentum shifted.

However, the broader trend in whale order size remained uneven. Sustained expansion would be needed to confirm a strong conviction.

That history kept sentiment cautious.

Ethena: Structure builds above $0.10

TradingView data showed ENA repeatedly defending the $0.10 zone. The level marked three recent reaction lows.

Price traded near $0.103–$0.104 at the time of writing. Holding above $0.10 kept short-term structure intact.

By contrast, overhead liquidity appeared concentrated near the $0.13 region. That area aligned with prior breakdown levels.

A break above $0.13 could shift near-term momentum. Failure to hold $0.10 may reopen downside risk.

ENA’s rebound coincided with steady Open Interest and visible whale participation. That combination suggested positioning rather than panic covering.

However, continuation depended on sustained Spot Volume and broader market stability.

For now, ENA held above key support. Whether bulls could reclaim higher liquidity zones remained the central question.


Final Summary

  • ENA gained nearly 10% in 24 hours, rebounding from repeated defenses of the $0.10 support zone.
  • Ethena’s Aggregated Open Interest rose to around $110.5 million, indicating renewed derivatives participation.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the percentage gain of Ethena's ENA token in the past 24 hours and what key support level did it bounce from?

AEthena's ENA token gained nearly 10% in the past 24 hours, rebounding from sub-$0.10 lows after repeatedly defending the $0.10 support zone.

QAccording to Coinalyze data, what was the value of Ethena's Aggregated Open Interest and what does its rise typically indicate?

AEthena's Aggregated Open Interest rose to approximately $110.5 million. A rising Open Interest during a rebound typically indicates fresh capital entering positions.

QWhat did the spikes in CryptoQuant's Spot Average Order Size data suggest about whale activity?

AThe periodic spikes in larger orders, as shown by the data, suggested that big whale orders appeared during recent price dips, which often reflects accumulation during periods of weakness.

QWhat are the two key price levels identified for ENA's near-term momentum, and what would a break above the higher level signify?

AThe two key levels are support at $0.10 and overhead liquidity near $0.13. A break above $0.13 could shift the near-term momentum for ENA.

QWhat two factors does the article suggest are necessary for ENA's price continuation?

AThe article states that ENA's price continuation depends on sustained Spot Volume and broader market stability.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

Storm's Eye: South Korean Market De-leveraging Nears Completion The recent sharp correction in South Korean equities, with the KOSPI index dropping 32% from its June high, has been a key trigger for global tech stock volatility. The core driver was not a fundamental shift but a forced de-leveraging process within the market's unique structure, which is now largely complete. Two main leverage channels amplified the sell-off: 1. **Leveraged ETFs:** Their size, proportionally four times larger than in the U.S., peaked near $50 billion. Their mandatory daily rebalancing mechanism created a vicious cycle of "price drop → forced selling → further drop." Approximately 75% of this excess has been unwound, shrinking to $26 billion, with regulatory curbs now blocking new inflows. 2. **Hedge Fund Leverage:** Using swaps to magnify exposure, hedge funds saw their net long positioning fall by over 50% from peak levels. The most intense phase of this institutional de-leveraging is over. In contrast, **retail margin debt** poses minimal systemic risk. At 0.5% of market cap, it is far lower than in the U.S. or China, lacks automatic triggers, and is concentrated in smaller stocks. The conclusion: the high-leverage structures most prone to "chain-reaction selling" have been substantially cleared. The market is transitioning from a liquidity-driven crash to one priced more on fundamentals. The article argues that the AI trend—centered on Korean memory chips—remains intact. This episode represents a painful but necessary clearing of crowded trades, not the end of the AI revolution. For investors, the key question is conviction in the long-term AI direction; if the trend is real, current volatility is a cost of entry, not a terminal risk.

链捕手Hace 55 min(s)

Global Stock Market's Storm Center: South Korea's Stock Market De-leveraging Is Largely Complete

链捕手Hace 55 min(s)

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

"The Enduring Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payments Lack a First Principle" Stripe is reportedly attempting to acquire PayPal, marking a significant shift reminiscent of PayPal's merger with the original X.com 30 years ago. The article analyzes Stripe's strategic challenges and the broader payments industry landscape. Despite its initial success with a developer-friendly API model, Stripe missed its optimal IPO window during the pandemic and has since seen its valuation decline. Its attempts to expand through acquisitions and new ventures, particularly in stablecoins (like its OUSD project) and Agent-focused payments (ACP/MPP protocols), have faced headwinds. The author argues that the payment industry remains highly fragmented and is ultimately an adjunct to the traditional banking system. This structure limits the potential for any single player, including Stripe, to achieve complete dominance. While stablecoins and the future rise of autonomous Agent economies present potential growth avenues, they are not yet mainstream and still require integration with the existing financial system. For now, Agent-based transactions are largely used for speculative "volume boosting" rather than substantive business applications. Stripe's current move to acquire PayPal is seen as an attempt to bolster its weak consumer-facing (C-side) business after its stablecoin-focused strategies faltered. Meanwhile, PayPal is described as structurally outdated, unable to revive itself through new products like Venmo or PYUSD. The future of payments may lie not in payments themselves but in value-added services like more efficient settlement networks. The author suggests that companies like Stripe and Circle, which are building their own blockchains (Tempo, Arc) and stablecoins, are positioning themselves to eventually profit from high-efficiency settlement systems. These new networks could potentially bypass some traditional banking layers. In conclusion, the article posits that third-party payment is a perpetually fragmented battlefield where scale alone cannot ensure victory. Players must find new models, focusing on efficiency to compete with the entrenched banking system. Stripe's acquisition of PayPal represents a bet on this uncertain future.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

The Eternal Fragments of Money: Third-Party Payment Has No First Principle

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片