ETFs Attract $100 Million, DAT Included in Russell 3000: Hyperliquid's "Wall Street Moment"

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-29Actualizado a 2026-05-29

Resumen

ICE CEO Jeff Sprecher publicly praised Hyperliquid, calling it "larger than Nasdaq" and expressing admiration for its team. This praise comes just 12 days after ICE and CME reportedly lobbied the CFTC to scrutinize the platform. Sprecher clarified the lobbying was aimed at securing a level regulatory playing field for traditional exchanges, not shutting Hyperliquid down. He highlighted Hyperliquid's role as a potential "shadow pricing" venue for SpaceX's upcoming IPO, noting its pre-IPO derivatives trading. Meanwhile, Hyperliquid is experiencing significant mainstream adoption. Two U.S. spot HYPE ETFs launched in mid-May have attracted over $1 billion in inflows within 10 days. Furthermore, Hyperliquid Strategies (PURR), a major HYPE holder, is set to join the Russell 3000 index in June. Facing regulatory pressure, Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan and the platform's policy arm are engaging directly with policymakers in Washington to advocate for a clear regulatory path for on-chain derivatives. HYPE token recently hit a new all-time high above $64.

Author: Claude, TechFlow News

TechFlow Insights: ICE (parent company of NYSE) founder and CEO Jeff Sprecher publicly praised Hyperliquid at the Bernstein Investor Conference on May 27, saying it is "bigger than Nasdaq" and "I wish I was younger to get involved personally." This statement came just 12 days after ICE and CME jointly lobbied the CFTC to "crack down" on Hyperliquid. Sprecher also revealed that the NYSE has secretly integrated a blockchain settlement system. HYPE token hit a new all-time high of $64 this week, with two spot ETFs raising over $100 million in 10 days after launch, and its DAT company PURR was included in the Russell 3000 index.

On May 27, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) founder and CEO Jeff Sprecher gave a rare and explicitly personal appraisal of Hyperliquid during an interview at the Bernstein Annual Strategic Decisions Conference.

"This thing we're talking about, Hyperliquid, if you haven't heard about it, it's bigger than Nasdaq, OK? Eleven people. You look at this, you say, wow, that's amazing," Sprecher said. He added immediately: "I love this. I wish I was younger so I could go do this personally. By the way, the people doing this are becoming billionaires in droves."

ICE is the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange and also operates one of the world's largest energy futures markets. Sprecher's comments represent the most direct public endorsement of Hyperliquid by the highest levels of traditional finance to date.

From Joint Lobbying for a "Crackdown" 12 Days Ago to CEO's Change of Tone

The reason Sprecher's praise caused a stir is the timeline.

On May 15, Bloomberg reported that CME and ICE executives had warned CFTC and Capitol Hill officials, arguing that Hyperliquid's decentralized perpetual contract trading could pose risks of market manipulation and sanctions evasion, and demanding it be brought under traditional financial regulation. After the news broke, HYPE fell nearly 9%.

Just 12 days later, the head of ICE expressed admiration publicly at one of Wall Street's most important investor conferences.

At the Bernstein conference, Sprecher directly addressed this contradiction: "There was a headline of a story that made it sound like we were freaked out. We're not freaked out. We're actually in dialogue with these people, learning what they're doing. They're learning our world, we're learning their world. In that sense, it's a mutual admiration society."

But he quickly turned to the core regulatory demand: "What we said to regulators is, can we do that, too? Why are you telling us we can't do it when this is happening? Can we have a level playing field? This administration is very pro-digital. If you think it's legal, let us do it; if you think it's illegal, why aren't they getting the nasty letters you're sending us?"

This statement reveals the real logic behind ICE's lobbying of the CFTC: not to shut down Hyperliquid, but to ask regulators to loosen restrictions on themselves, allowing traditional exchanges to participate in the on-chain derivatives market as well.

On the Eve of SpaceX's IPO: Hyperliquid Becomes a "Shadow Pricing Market"

Sprecher's interest in Hyperliquid isn't casual; he has a very specific observation window: SpaceX is set to list on Nasdaq on June 12 with a valuation of about $1.75 trillion, and Hyperliquid is already trading SpaceX derivatives contracts.

"I think what really puts it on the map is SpaceX. They've already listed SpaceX derivatives for trading. It's going to be very interesting on June 11th when SpaceX is officially priced, to see what price this private market discovers, and whether that price will influence the IPO itself," Sprecher said. "Regulators and market participants will say, this is either completely irrelevant or highly relevant."

He then calculated an extreme scenario: Considering Hyperliquid allows up to 100:1 leverage, if retail investors flood into SpaceX derivatives, the notional exposure size on-chain "could be larger than the IPO itself."

"So I say you can't ignore it. I don't know yet whether we should embrace it or hate it, but I think by June we'll all have the answer."

HYPE ETFs Raise $100 Million in 10 Days, PURR Included in Russell 3000

Sprecher's comments came as Hyperliquid experienced a wave of intensive mainstreaming catalysts.

On May 12 and 15, 21Shares and Bitwise launched the first US spot HYPE ETFs (tickers THYP and BHYP) on Nasdaq and NYSE, respectively. According to bitcoin.com, the two funds saw cumulative net inflows exceeding $100 million in the first 10 trading days, absorbing 1.04% of HYPE's total market cap. On a market cap proportion basis, this outperformed the initial launch performance of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs over the same period. Bitwise recorded a single-day net inflow of $19.05 million on May 27, becoming the world's largest HYPE ETF.

On May 22, FTSE Russell announced the preliminary list for the 2026 Russell US Indexes reconstitution. Hyperliquid Strategies (Nasdaq ticker PURR) appeared on the addition list for the Russell 3000 Index, expected to take effect on June 26.

PURR is currently the largest HYPE token treasury company, holding approximately 20 million HYPE (valued at about $799 million as of April 29) and an additional $103 million in cash, with no debt. Inclusion in the Russell 3000 means passive funds tracking the index will be forced to buy PURR, further opening a transmission channel for HYPE into traditional capital markets.

The HYPE token briefly surpassed $64 this week to reach a new all-time high, with a year-to-date gain of about 150%, far outpacing Bitcoin's performance over the same period. According to CoinGecko data, HYPE's current market cap is approximately $12.7 billion, ranking 10th among crypto assets.

Jeff Yan Goes to Washington, Hyperliquid Policy Center Meets the Challenge Head-On

Faced with lobbying pressure from CME and ICE, Hyperliquid chose to respond directly.

Hyperliquid founder Jeff Yan revealed on May 15 that he and the Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC) had met with policymakers in Washington. HPC is an independent research and advocacy institute established in February 2026, led by Jake Chervinsky, former Head of Policy at the Blockchain Association and former Chief Legal Officer at Variant. It was launched with funding of 1 million HYPE allocated by the Hyper Foundation.

On platform X, Yan stated that the meetings discussed "how on-chain trading, as a financial innovation, has a clear global user demand" and "regulatory pathways for bringing on-chain derivatives markets to the US."

Responding to Bloomberg's report on CME and ICE lobbying, HPC stated that the market provided by Hyperliquid is "more beneficial and less risky than traditional centralized exchanges" and expects the CFTC to establish a specialized regulatory framework for on-chain derivatives platforms.

An interesting detail: CME and ICE themselves are currently facing parallel investigations by the CFTC and the Justice Department due to "perfectly timed" oil futures trades on their respective platforms ahead of federal policy announcements.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the remarkable comment made by ICE founder and CEO Jeff Sprecher about Hyperliquid at the Bernstein conference?

AHe stated that Hyperliquid is 'bigger than Nasdaq' and expressed admiration, saying 'I love this. I wish I was younger so I could go do it myself.'

QHow much capital did the two HYPE spot ETFs raise within 10 days of their launch, and how does this compare to the performance of other crypto ETFs?

AThe two HYPE ETFs raised over $100 million in 10 trading days. This capital inflow accounted for 1.04% of HYPE's total market cap, a rate that exceeded the debut performance of Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs on a proportional basis.

QWhy is the upcoming SpaceX IPO a significant event for observing Hyperliquid's market influence according to Jeff Sprecher?

ASprecher noted that Hyperliquid is already trading SpaceX derivatives. He is interested to see if the price discovered on this private market will influence the official IPO price on June 12, especially considering the high leverage (up to 100:1) on Hyperliquid could create enormous notional exposure.

QWhich Hyperliquid-associated company is set to be added to the Russell 3000 Index, and what is its primary asset?

AHyperliquid Strategies, with the Nasdaq ticker PURR, is on the preliminary addition list for the Russell 3000. Its primary asset is approximately 20 million HYPE tokens, valued at around $799 million as of April 29, alongside $103 million in cash.

QWhat was the apparent contradiction in ICE's actions regarding Hyperliquid within a 12-day period in May, and how did Jeff Sprecher explain it?

AOn May 15, ICE and CME reportedly lobbied the CFTC about potential risks from Hyperliquid. Twelve days later, on May 27, Sprecher publicly praised it. He explained that the lobbying was not out of fear but to request a 'level playing field' where traditional exchanges like ICE could also operate under the same rules if the activity is deemed legal.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX LearnHace 54 min(s)

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX LearnHace 54 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片