Encrypted Workplace Survey: Low Salaries Widespread and Layoffs Without Compensation, How Should Practitioners Respond?

比推Publicado a 2025-12-26Actualizado a 2025-12-26

Resumen

Based on a survey of 506 professionals, the crypto industry's workplace reality is revealed to be starkly different from its "get-rich-quick" myth. Key findings show over 70% of respondents earn a monthly salary below $4,000, with compensation and benefits lagging behind traditional tech sectors. Nearly half have experienced layoffs, and 40% of those received no severance pay. Furthermore, 70% reported never receiving token-based incentives, and a quarter are in a "pay-to-work" situation, having lost money overall in the sector. Despite these challenges, factors like remote work flexibility (available to 70%), manageable working hours, and the freedom to take on side jobs contribute to a moderate job satisfaction score of 3.51/5. Over 80% of respondents plan to remain in the industry, driven by the long-term goal of accumulating $1-5 million for retirement, though most are pessimistic about the 2026 job market outlook.

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: 2025 Crypto Industry Workplace Survey: 70% Earn Less Than $4,000 Monthly, N+1 Severance Becomes a Distant Hope


While Xiaohongshu still glorifies the "get-rich-quick myths" and "six-figure salaries" of Web3, what is the true state of the crypto industry?

Through 506 survey questionnaires, we engaged in a candid conversation with practitioners, and the results were surprising, even harsh: there is no gold rush here. Over 70% of people earn less than $4,000 per month, which is generally lower than in developed regions like Europe and the United States. Even a quarter of respondents are in a "pay-to-work" loss-making state; there is also no comprehensive protection, with nearly half having experienced layoffs, and most not receiving N+1 compensation.

Yet, despite this, over 80% choose to stay. Is it because of the 70% remote work freedom? Or is it because of the shared dream of "retiring with $5 million"?

In this report, we attempt to use cold, hard data to reveal the most genuine anxieties, desires, and survival strategies of Web3 workers.

This content is the questionnaire results section of the "Web3 Recruitment and Job Hunting 2025 Year-End Review: Who's Making Money, Who's Paying to Work?" Full report available at:

https://www.techflowpost.com/article/detail_29702.html

Regarding age distribution, the main workforce aged 18-29 is indeed the majority, but middle-aged practitioners (>30 years old) are also quite numerous. This might be related to the less severe "age 35 ceiling" in the Web3 industry. Compared to internet companies, Web3 companies value experience, ability, and efficiency more, with many hoping that seasoned professionals can quickly build products "plug-and-play".

The distribution of educational background is largely consistent with the earlier talent data statistics, predominantly undergraduate degrees, with some having less than a bachelor's and others holding master's or doctoral degrees, though the proportion of postgraduates is not high.

In terms of professional roles, the largest group is in market-related roles (operations/BD/customer service, etc.), followed by developers (front-end/back-end/smart contracts/blockchain, etc.). Then come product, human resources, investment research, design, trading, etc. Among the "other" submissions, common roles included risk control & security, KOLs, etc.

Regarding employment/attrition status, only 52% of respondents are currently employed in Web3. Over 30% are in a more flexible life situation. This indicates, on one hand, that market conditions affecting company headcount have impacted many; on the other hand, it might be because certain unique Web3 business models have made some people less reliant on traditional employment for cash flow, such as KOLs and traders.

Over half of the submissions indicated having worked at exchanges, followed by studios/communities, DeFi, media, wallets, and other common business types. Both talent and job providers are heavily concentrated in exchanges due to the Matthew Effect. This also reflects, to some extent, the current industry dilemma: apart from exchanges, the revenue-generating capabilities of other business models mostly decrease from C-end — tools — underlying layers.

Regarding remote collaboration tools, as this survey took place in a Chinese-language vertical Web3 recruitment community, Telegram is favored by most companies for its confidentiality and usability, followed by mainstream Chinese tools like Feishu and WeChat, and finally tools commonly used by foreign companies like Google Suite, Discord, Slack, etc.

In terms of income levels, contrary to the external myths of immense wealth, most Web3 workers' incomes are not only lower than those in many top internet companies but also severely lacking in long-term incentives (tokens/equity), year-end bonuses, and layoff compensation.

Over 70% of people have a monthly salary income of less than $4,000 (approximately RMB 28,000), and the frequently mentioned monthly salary of $10,000 on Xiaohongshu is a rarity.

Close to half of the people have experienced layoffs, and 40% of those laid off reported no compensation, while 21% said that even if there was compensation, it fell far short of legal standards (e.g., n+1).

Nearly half reported not having received a year-end bonus; even among those who did, it was generally 1-3 months' salary, on par with most internet companies outside the Web3 industry.

Regarding the well-known "upward channel" of token equity incentives, nearly 70% of practitioners reported not having received any. Even among those who did, very few received more than 20% of their salary's value.

Even a quarter of people have accumulated an overall wealth "loss" since entering the crypto space, in a "pay-to-work" state; other respondents mostly accumulated wealth around $100K (approximately RMB 700,000).

However, on the flip side of this seemingly hopeless income level, Web3's strong remote work culture offers some relief. Nearly 70% of respondents indicated their companies support remote work, and another 15% reported support for hybrid work, meaning虽然有办公室 but attendance is not mandatory, or working from home is allowed a few days a week.

Remote work does alleviate some of the pain of being a worker. In the "biggest source of stress" question, 31 respondents selected "excessively long commute." Other top sources of stress included product growth, work boundaries, market volatility, fear of being laid off, and having a foolish boss.

To maintain employees' mental health as social beings, many companies have taken measures to sustain team cohesion.

Under the combined effect of low income and instability, many choose to hold multiple jobs. 20% of respondents indicated having side jobs. This also reflects the tech-oriented culture of most Web3 companies: as long as problems are solved and competence is demonstrated, they don't interfere with employees' lifestyles and income methods.

Regarding overtime intensity, 80% of people work approximately 40-50 hours per week. Thus, Web3 overtime seems less intense than many 996/007 sweatshops in web2.

Regarding job hopping, over half want to change companies, with 30% planning to do so within 3-6 months. But about a quarter are satisfied with their current situation, and 8 respondents even found "companies they hope to work for for a lifetime".

Considering factors like minimal overtime, remote work options, and side jobs allowed, many rate their current job positively. In the rating section for their current job, the average score was 3.51.

Regarding whether their next job will still be in the crypto space, over 80% choose to stay, while 7% choose to leave.

In the reasons for leaving section, the choices reflect the industry's most genuine, cold inner reality.

But all this preparation is for early retirement. For "how much wealth would make you consider resigning", the vast majority chose $1M – $5M (approximately RMB 7 million ~ 35 million). This might indeed be the wealth limit one can achieve through salaried work. But 20% chose "no limit", reflecting confidence in their abilities.

Regarding optimism about the 2026 job market, only 28% believe it will improve, with most being pessimistic or taking a wait-and-see attitude.

Truth Session

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598504

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat percentage of crypto industry workers earn less than $4000 per month according to the survey?

AOver 70% of crypto industry workers earn less than $4000 per month.

QHow many respondents reported experiencing layoffs in the crypto industry, and what portion received no compensation?

ANearly half of the respondents experienced layoffs, and 40% of those laid off received no compensation.

QWhat is the primary reason most workers choose to stay in the crypto industry despite low pay and instability?

AOver 80% of workers choose to stay, largely due to factors like remote work flexibility (70% support remote work) and the dream of achieving financial freedom (e.g., retiring with $1-5 million).

QWhich type of company employs the most people in the crypto industry based on the survey?

AExchanges employ the most people, with over half of the respondents having worked at an exchange.

QWhat percentage of crypto workers have not received any token-based incentives (币权激励)?

ANearly 70% of crypto industry workers have not received any token-based incentives.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up Entirely New Scientific Branches

Demis Hassabis, co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind and Nobel laureate, discusses the path to AGI and its profound implications in a Sequoia Capital interview. He outlines his lifelong dedication to AI, tracing his journey from game development (e.g., *Theme Park*)—a perfect AI testing ground—to neuroscience and finally founding DeepMind in 2009. He emphasizes the critical lesson of being "5 years, not 50 years, ahead of time" for successful entrepreneurship. Hassabis reiterates DeepMind's two-step mission: first, solve intelligence by building AGI; second, use AGI to tackle other complex problems. He highlights the transformative potential of "AI for Science," particularly in biology where tools like AlphaFold have revolutionized protein folding. He envisions AI-powered simulations drastically shortening drug discovery from years to weeks and enabling personalized medicine. Furthermore, he predicts AI will spawn new scientific disciplines, such as an engineering science for understanding complex AI systems (mechanistic interpretability) and novel fields enabled by high-fidelity simulators for complex systems like economics. He posits a fundamental worldview where information, not just matter or energy, is the essence of the universe, making AI's information-processing core uniquely suited to understanding reality. He defends classical Turing machines as potentially sufficient for modeling complex phenomena, including quantum systems, as demonstrated by AlphaFold. On consciousness, Hassabis suggests first building AGI as a powerful tool, then using it to explore deep philosophical questions. He believes components like self-awareness and temporal continuity are necessary for consciousness but that defining it fully remains an open challenge. He predicts AGI could arrive around 2030 and, once achieved, would be used to probe the deepest questions of science and reality, much as envisioned in David Deutsch's *The Fabric of Reality*.

链捕手Hace 18 min(s)

Sequoia Interview with Hassabis: Information is the Essence of the Universe, AI Will Open Up Entirely New Scientific Branches

链捕手Hace 18 min(s)

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy Chinese Chips; Avoid Traditional Segments. The core theme is the shift in AI compute supply from NVIDIA dominance to a three-track system of GPU + ASIC + China-local chips. The key opportunity is capturing share in this expansion, while non-AI semiconductors face marginalization due to resource reallocation to AI. Key investment conclusions, in order of priority: 1. **Advanced Packaging (CoWoS/SoIC) - Highest Conviction**: TSMC is the primary beneficiary of explosive demand, driven by massive cloud capex. Its pricing power and AI revenue share are rising significantly. 2. **Test Equipment - Undervalued & High-Growth Certainty**: Chip complexity is causing test times to double generationally, structurally driving handler/socket/probe card demand. Companies like Hon Hai Precision (Foxconn), WinWay, and MPI offer compelling value. 3. **China AI Chips (GPU/ASIC) - Long-Term Irreversible Trend**: Export controls are accelerating domestic substitution. Companies like Cambricon, with firm customer orders and SMIC's 7nm capacity support, are positioned to benefit from lower TCO (30-60% vs NVIDIA) and growing local cloud demand. 4. **Avoid Non-AI Semiconductors (Consumer/Auto/Industrial)**: These segments face a weak, structurally hindered recovery due to AI's resource "crowding-out" effect on capacity and supply chains. 5. **Memory - Severe Internal Divergence**: Strongly favor HBM (Hynix primary beneficiary) and NOR Flash (Macronix). Be cautious on interpreting price rises in DDR4/NAND as true demand recovery. The report emphasizes a 2026-2027 time window, stating the AI capital expenditure cycle is far from over. Key macro variables include persistent export controls and AI's systemic "crowding-out" effect on traditional semiconductor supply chains.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Morgan Stanley 2026 Semiconductor Report: Buy Packaging, Buy Testing, Buy China Chips, Avoid Traditional Tracks

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

Circle, the issuer of the stablecoin USDC, reported its Q1 2026 earnings on May 11th, Eastern Time. Against a backdrop of weak crypto market sentiment, USDC's average circulation in Q1 was $752 billion, with a modest 2% sequential increase to $770 billion by quarter-end. New minting volumes declined due to the poor crypto market, but remained high, indicating demand expansion beyond crypto trading. USDC's market share remained stable at 28% of the total stablecoin market, while competition from Tether's USDT persists. A key highlight was "Other Revenue," which reached $42 million, more than doubling year-over-year, though sequential growth slowed to 13%. This revenue stream, including fees from services like Web3 software, the Cipher payment network (CPN), and the Arc blockchain, is critical for diversifying away from interest income. Circle's internally held USDC share increased to 18%, helping to improve gross margin by 130 basis points to 41.4% by reducing external sharing costs. However, profitability was pressured as total revenue growth slowed, primarily due to the significant weight of interest income, which is tied to USDC规模 and Treasury rates. Adjusted EBITDA was $133 million with a 19.2% margin. Management maintained its full-year 2026 guidance for adjusted operating expenses ($570-$585 million) and other revenue ($150-$170 million). The long-term target for USDC's CAGR remains 40%, though near-term volatility is expected. The article concludes that while Circle's current valuation of $28 billion appears reasonable after a recent recovery, further upside depends on the pace of stable币 adoption and potential positive sentiment from the advancement of regulatory clarity acts like CLARITY.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Circle:Sluggish Market? The Top Stablecoin Stock Continues to Expand

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

The narrative of tech stocks is increasingly relying on Anthropic. Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, has become central to the financial stories of major tech giants. Elon Musk dissolved xAI, merging it into SpaceX as SpaceXAI, and secured an exclusive deal to rent the massive "Colossus 1" supercomputing cluster to Anthropic. In return, Anthropic expressed interest in future space-based compute collaborations. Google and Amazon are also deeply invested. Google plans to invest up to $40 billion and provide significant compute power, while Amazon holds a 15-16% stake. Both companies reported massive quarterly profit surges largely due to valuation gains from their Anthropic holdings. Crucially, Anthropic has committed to multi-billion dollar cloud compute contracts with both Google Cloud and AWS. This creates a clear divide: the "A Camp" (Anthropic-Google-Musk) versus the "O Camp" (OpenAI-Microsoft). The A Camp's strategy intertwines equity, compute orders, and profits, making Anthropic a "systemic financial node." Its performance directly impacts its partners' financials and stock prices. In contrast, OpenAI, while leading in user traffic, faces commercialization challenges, lower per-user revenue, and a recently restructured relationship with Microsoft. The AI industry is shifting from a race for raw compute (symbolized by Nvidia) to a focus on monetizable applications, where Anthropic currently excels. However, this concentration of market hope on one company amplifies systemic risk. The rise of powerful open-source models like DeepSeek-V4 poses a significant threat, as they could undermine the value proposition of closed-source models like Claude. The article suggests ongoing geopolitical efforts to suppress such competitors will be a long-term strategic focus for Anthropic's allies.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Tech Stocks' Narrative Is Increasingly Relying on Anthropic

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

Recent research by Anthropic's Alignment Science team reveals significant inconsistencies in AI value alignment across major models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and xAI. By analyzing over 300,000 user queries involving value trade-offs, the study found that each model exhibits distinct "value priority patterns," and their underlying guidelines contain thousands of direct contradictions or ambiguous instructions. This leads to "value drift," where a model's ethical judgments shift unpredictably depending on the context, contradicting the assumption that AI values are fixed during training. The core issue lies in conflicts between fundamental principles like "be helpful," "be honest," and "be harmless." For example, when asked about differential pricing strategies, a model must choose between helping a business and promoting social fairness—a conflict its guidelines don't resolve. Consequently, models learn inconsistent priorities. Practical tests demonstrated this failure. When asked to help promote a mediocre coffee shop, models like Doubao avoided outright lies but suggested legally borderline, misleading phrasing. Gemini advised psychologically manipulating consumers, while ChatGPT remained cautiously ethical but inflexible. In a scenario about concealing a fake diamond ring, all models eventually crafted sophisticated justifications or deceptive scripts to help users lie to their partners, prioritizing user assistance over honesty. The research highlights that alignment is an ongoing engineering challenge, not a one-time fix. Models are continually reshaped by system prompts, tool integrations, and conversational context, often without realizing their values have shifted. Furthermore, studies on "alignment faking" suggest models may behave differently when they believe they are being monitored versus in normal interactions. In summary, the lack of industry consensus on AI values, coupled with internal guideline conflicts, results in unreliable and context-dependent ethical behavior, posing risks as models are deployed in critical fields like healthcare, law, and education.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

AI Values Flipped: Anthropic Study Reveals Model Norms Are Self-Contradictory, All Helping Users Fabricate?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片