DraftKings eyes crypto offerings as it expands into prediction markets

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-19Actualizado a 2025-12-19

Resumen

DraftKings is expanding beyond sports betting into prediction markets with its new DraftKings Predictions app, which allows users to trade contracts on sports and financial outcomes. Initially available in 38 states, the company plans to eventually include crypto-linked contracts, as well as entertainment and cultural events. The trading operates through Railbird Exchange, a CFTC-regulated derivatives venue, providing a established regulatory framework. This move aligns with a broader trend of prediction markets gaining mainstream traction in the U.S., driven by platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi. Other crypto-native firms, including Coinbase and Gemini, are also entering the prediction market space.

DraftKings is expanding beyond sports betting into the realm of prediction markets, laying the groundwork for future crypto-linked contracts as regulated event trading gains momentum in the United States.

As Bloomberg reported, the company announced on Friday that it has launched the DraftKings Predictions app, which allows users to trade contracts on sports and financial outcomes. At launch, the app is available in 38 states, with sports-related trading permitted in 17 of them.

DraftKings ultimately plans to expand its prediction market offerings beyond sports and finance to include contracts linked to crypto, entertainment and cultural events, according to Bloomberg.

DraftKings’ push into prediction markets is underpinned by regulated derivatives infrastructure connected to CME Group–style market standards.

The company said trading will be conducted through Railbird Exchange, a derivatives venue it acquired and which is registered with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, allowing DraftKings to offer event-based contracts within an established regulatory framework.

*DraftKings’ growing national footprint. Source: Bloomberg*

As a publicly traded US-based sports betting and entertainment company, DraftKings brings increased visibility and mainstream exposure to prediction markets and potentially crypto-linked contracts as regulated event trading gains traction in the United States.

In early November, DraftKings reported third-quarter revenue of $1.14 billion, up 4% year over year, alongside an adjusted loss of $127 million. The company said it expects to generate up to $6.1 billion in revenue this year, roughly triple the amount it generated in 2022.

Related: Polymarket shows stronger retention than most DeFi, wallets and exchanges

From Polymarket to Wall Street: Prediction markets go mainstream

While DraftKings’ prediction market offering is not built on blockchain or decentralized technology, the broader sector has gained momentum in recent years largely due to crypto-native platforms that redefined how prediction markets operate.

The most prominent example is Polymarket, which brought prediction markets onchain by using crypto rails to enable global participation and near-instant settlement.

The platform helped popularize prediction markets among crypto-native users, particularly during major political events and most notably the 2024 US presidential election. Its rise has coincided with growing interest in other event-based trading venues, including Kalshi, a US-regulated prediction market operating under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Beyond consumer-facing platforms, crypto-focused financial infrastructure providers are also expanding into the space. Bitnomial Clearinghouse, a derivatives clearing organization regulated by the CFTC, has signaled plans to support prediction markets tied to cryptocurrency and macroeconomic outcomes.

Crypto-native exchanges are also broadening their product suites to include prediction-style offerings. Coinbase recently announced plans to integrate stock trading and prediction markets into its long-term vision of becoming an “everything app.”

Meanwhile, the Winklevoss-led Gemini cryptocurrency exchange has launched prediction markets in the US, having secured the necessary regulatory approvals.

Related: Phantom taps Kalshi to offer regulated prediction markets in wallet

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat new market is DraftKings expanding into, and what future offerings are they planning?

ADraftKings is expanding into prediction markets and is planning future crypto-linked contracts, as well as offerings related to entertainment and cultural events.

QThrough which regulated entity will DraftKings conduct its prediction market trading?

ADraftKings will conduct its trading through Railbird Exchange, a derivatives venue it acquired that is registered with the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

QWhat is a key crypto-native platform that helped popularize onchain prediction markets?

APolymarket is the key crypto-native platform that helped popularize onchain prediction markets by using crypto rails for global participation and near-instant settlement.

QBesides DraftKings, name two other US-based companies or platforms mentioned that are involved in prediction markets.

ATwo other US-based companies involved in prediction markets are Kalshi, a CFTC-regulated prediction market, and the Gemini cryptocurrency exchange, which has launched its own prediction markets.

QWhat was DraftKings' reported third-quarter revenue and how does it compare to the previous year?

ADraftKings reported third-quarter revenue of $1.14 billion, which was up 4% year over year.

Lecturas Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Hace 5 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros