Dogecoin loses $0.10 support: Can DOGE stop the downtrend?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-20Actualizado a 2026-02-20

Resumen

Dogecoin (DOGE) broke below the critical $0.10 support level, reaching a local low of $0.095 before a slight rebound to $0.098. The downtrend is driven by persistent bearish pressure, with sellers dominating the market for over a month. Key indicators like the Bulls and Bears Power and Buyer-Seller Strength show significant bearish control, while exchange data reveals higher sell volumes and a negative buy-sell delta. The Price Momentum Oscillator remains negative, and the RSI stays below 50, indicating continued downward momentum. If the trend persists, DOGE could drop to $0.092 or even $0.08. A reversal would require reclaiming and holding above $0.11.

With bearish pressure and market weakness persisting, Dogecoin [DOGE] broke below the $0.10 support, hitting a local low of $0.095 before rebounding slightly to $0.099.

At press time, DOGE was trading at $0.098, up 0.73%, reflecting heightened volatility.

Bearish pressure strains Dogecoin’s structure

DOGE lost its $ 0.10 support level again, largely driven by heightened sell-side activity. As such, DOGE sellers have dumped at every opportunity, further straining the market.

Looking at the Bulls and Bears power indicator on TradingView, the Bears have commanded total control of the market.

Bears have dominated the market for thirty consecutive days since displacing sellers on the 19th of January, and all attempts by bulls to regain control have failed.

At press time, the Bears’ position was 64 compared to 9 for the Bulls, reflecting a significant gap in their market presence. As such, although bulls are active, their presence remains insufficient to sustain a trend reversal.

The Buyer-Seller Strength indicator further supports this. Sellers have remained relatively powerful, with their strength hiking to 68 at press time.

Coupled with that, exchange activity also echoed this bearish dominance. According to Coinalyze, Dogecoin recorded higher Sell Volume for five consecutive days, signaling a lack of bullish conviction.

Over the past day, for example, the memecoin saw 697 million in Sell Volume compared to 619 million in Buy Volume. As a result, the market recorded a negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million, a clear sign of aggressive selling.

Historically, such market behavior has tended to strengthen downside and weaken any upside momentum, leading to lower prices.

Is DOGE at risk of further slip?

Dogecoin traded below its critical support level, amid sustained bearish pressure. With bears running riot in the market, all attempts by bulls to hold on have proved futile.

In fact, the memecoin’s Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO) remained negative despite making a bullish crossover days ago. With the PMO holding a negative, it suggests that most price changes have been negative on average.

Thus, markets have closed at lower levels, signaling a bearish trend and confirming a medium- to long-term downtrend, not a mere pullback.

At the same time, the memecoin’s Relative Strength Index (RSI) has remained stuck below 50 for a week, further validating this bearishness. Persistent bearish momentum signals a likelihood of downside continuation.

A trend continuation could see DOGE drop to $0.092, most likely losing its $0.09 support, and then fall to $0.08. To invalidate this bearish scenario, DOGE must reclaim $0.1 and firmly hold $0.11.


Final Summary

  • Dogecoin slipped below $0.1, hitting a low of $0.095 before rising slightly to $0.098 at press time.
  • DOGE’s downside spiral continued amid persisting bearish dominance in the market.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was Dogecoin's price movement after losing the $0.10 support level?

ADogecoin broke below the $0.10 support, hitting a local low of $0.095 before rebounding slightly to $0.099. At press time, it was trading at $0.098.

QAccording to the Bulls and Bears power indicator, how long have bears controlled the DOGE market?

ABears have commanded total control of the market for thirty consecutive days since displacing sellers on the 19th of January.

QWhat does the negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million indicate about market activity?

AThe negative Buy-Sell Delta of -78 million is a clear sign of aggressive selling, with sell volume (697 million) significantly outpacing buy volume (619 million) over the past day.

QWhat two key price levels does DOGE need to reclaim to invalidate the current bearish scenario?

ATo invalidate the bearish scenario, DOGE must reclaim the $0.10 level and then firmly hold above $0.11.

QWhat do the Price Momentum Oscillator (PMO) and Relative Strength Index (RSI) suggest about DOGE's trend?

AThe PMO remained negative, confirming a medium- to long-term downtrend, and the RSI has been stuck below 50 for a week, both validating persistent bearish momentum and a likelihood of further downside.

Lecturas Relacionadas

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

On April 24, 2026, DeepSeek released V4, a Chinese large language model offering a free "million-token context window," enabling it to process vast amounts of data like entire books or years of corporate documents in one go. In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released around the same time, is more powerful but significantly more expensive, charging up to $180 per million output tokens. DeepSeek’s strategy represents a shift from a pure AI research firm to a heavy-infrastructure player, building data centers in Inner Mongolia’s Ulanqab to bypass U.S. chip export restrictions. This move, supported by Huawei’s Ascend chips and China’s cheap green electricity, highlights a fundamental divergence in AI development models: U.S. firms focus on high-cost, high-margin services, while Chinese players like DeepSeek prioritize accessibility and affordability. Facing intense talent poaching from tech giants, DeepSeek is seeking a $44 billion valuation funding round to retain researchers and scale infrastructure. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are compressing AI models to run on smartphones, making AI accessible offline and across the Global South. Through open-source models and localized solutions, Chinese AI is empowering non-English speakers and low-income users, driving a form of "digital equality." While Silicon Valley builds walled gardens, DeepSeek and others are turning AI into a public utility—like tap water—flowing freely to those previously left behind.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

On April 24, the U.S. Department of Justice arrested U.S. Army Special Forces Staff Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke for insider trading related to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on January 3. Van Dyke allegedly profited over $400,000 by placing bets on a prediction market, Polymarket, using insider knowledge of the covert operation. According to the indictment, Van Dyke registered an account (0x31a5) on December 26 and made a series of bets predicting Maduro’s capture and U.S. military involvement in Venezuela. He withdrew most of his funds on the day of the operation and attempted to obscure his tracks by transferring assets through crypto and brokerage accounts. This case marks the first time the DOJ has prosecuted insider trading on Polymarket. PolyBeats had previously identified five suspicious accounts, including Van Dyke’s—the highest earner—in January. The other accounts, with profits ranging from $34,000 to $145,000, remain under unofficial scrutiny but have not been charged. Their lower profits, indirect access to information, and unclear legal boundaries may complicate prosecution. Polymarket has since strengthened its market integrity rules, explicitly prohibiting trading based on confidential or insider information. Van Dyke’s arrest, nearly four months after his trades, signals increased regulatory attention and the persistent traceability of blockchain-based transactions.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片