Dogecoin Is No Longer Bearish: Why Analysts Are Predicting A Better Future

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-19Actualizado a 2026-03-19

Resumen

Dogecoin's bearish trend has ended, with analysts predicting a bullish future. This shift follows Bitcoin surpassing $70,000, propelling DOGE into an uptrend after a prolonged accumulation phase. Analyst Master Ananda highlights the largest green candle in over a month, rising volumes, and strong oscillators as key indicators. Another analyst, Crypto Surf, notes a clean bounce from the 0.786 Fibonacci level and a break above the $0.08 confluence. The RSI downtrend has been broken, with the next critical resistance at $0.10. A clean break and close above this level could trigger further bullish momentum, though patience is advised.

With the recent turn in the tide led by Bitcoin crossing $70,000, the Dogecoin price has begun to see some upside. This has been propelled forward by the fact that the meme coin seems to have been stuck in a prolonged accumulation trend, now culminating in an uptrend. As the Dogecoin price continues to chase more rallies, a crypto analyst has called an end to the bearishness that has plagued the digital asset, suggesting that it is time for a change.

Dogecoin Is Turning Bullish

Crypto analyst Master Ananda published a callout for Dogecoin that suggests that the price may be getting into another bullish trend. In the post made on the TradingView website, the crypto analyst explains that Dogecoin is actually no longer bearish. This comes after the meme coin completed its largest green candle in more than one month, erasing the bearishness that has dominated over the last year.

Explaining why Dogecoin is no longer bearish, the crypto analyst points out that rising volumes, as well as the increase in prices, are culminating in the start of another bullish phase. DOGE, on its part, has seen a bullish breakout with momentum during this time.

Other factors that the crypto analyst calls out are the green candle and rising volume, followed by strong oscillators and marketwise action, which are pushing the bearish trend. Not only Dogecoin, though, the analyst predicts that the world will begin to lean toward the crypto market, and this is expected to trigger a bullish breakout.

Breaking Above $0.1 Holds The Key

Another crypto analyst, Crypto Surf, called out a possible continuation of the Dogecoin uptrend, using technical indicators for this. The first of these is the fact that the Dogecoin price had made a clean bounce off the 0.786 Fibonacci level, as well as breaking the long-term confluence at $0.08.

This move has effectively broken the RSI downtrend, putting it on a path for further recoveries. For now, the next major level lies at $0.1, and this is where the decision could be made for the meme coin. If it breaks above cleaning and completes a close above this level, then the crypto analyst believes this could be a trigger, and that patience is the key.

DOGE price moves down with bearish sentiment | Source: DOGEUSDT on Tradingview.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat recent event has contributed to Dogecoin's price upside according to the article?

ABitcoin crossing $70,000 has led to a turn in the tide, contributing to Dogecoin's recent price upside.

QWhich crypto analyst declared that Dogecoin is no longer bearish and on what platform?

ACrypto analyst Master Ananda declared that Dogecoin is no longer bearish in a post on the TradingView website.

QWhat are the key technical factors the analyst points to for Dogecoin's shift in trend?

AThe analyst points to rising volumes, an increase in prices, the largest green candle in over a month, strong oscillators, and marketwise action as key factors.

QWhat is the next major price level for Dogecoin that could trigger a further breakout?

AThe next major price level is $0.1. A clean break and close above this level could trigger a further bullish breakout.

QWhat specific Fibonacci level did the Dogecoin price bounce off from, according to analyst Crypto Surf?

AAccording to analyst Crypto Surf, the Dogecoin price made a clean bounce off the 0.786 Fibonacci level.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

In a candid interview, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang challenged competitors like Google and Amazon, admitted past strategic errors, and criticized U.S. export controls on AI chips. He framed Nvidia’s role as turning “electricity in, tokens out,” emphasizing the complexity and value of AI inference. Huang dismissed rival custom chips like Google’s TPU and Amazon’s Trainium as inflexible and niche, claiming their growth relies heavily on clients like Anthropic. He also acknowledged missing early investment opportunities in OpenAI and Anthropic. On China, Huang warned that export restrictions risk pushing the country toward self-sufficiency and could cost U.S. leadership in AI. Finally, he explained Nvidia’s acquisition of Groq as a move to serve premium, low-latency token markets. Throughout, Huang emphasized ecosystem trust and Nvidia’s central role in global AI infrastructure.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Jensen Huang Publicly Challenges Google and Amazon, Is the Chip Business Entirely Sustained by Anthropic?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

ARK Invest, a major investor in SpaceX, provides an analysis following SpaceX's confidential IPO filing on April 1, 2026, targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation and up to $75 billion in funding for a Nasdaq listing around June 2026. This would be the largest IPO in history. The valuation implies a price-to-sales ratio of ~95x based on ~$18.5B in projected 2025 revenue. ARK argues this reflects future potential, not current reality. Key drivers include Starlink, with over 10M users and $20B+ in 2026 revenue, launch services which have reduced costs by ~95% since 2008, and the strategic merger with xAI in February 2026, enabling vertically integrated AI and orbital computing. ARK’s investment thesis is based on SpaceX's proven execution of ambitious goals, like reusable rockets and global satellite internet. The firm notes that significant value creation often occurs pre-IPO, and its Venture Fund offers exposure to SpaceX’s earlier private stages. Post-IPO, the fund will manage the position per standard lock-up and rebalancing processes, maintaining flexibility to reinvest in other private innovations. The analysis is based on public estimates and ARK research; the S-1 filing is not yet public. This is not investment advice.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

ARK's SpaceX IPO Investment Guide: $1.75 Trillion Valuation, 95x Price-to-Sales Ratio, Where Is the Money Going?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

The article discusses the legislative stalemate in the US over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 (CLARITY Act), which aims to regulate crypto assets. A key point of contention is whether stablecoins should be allowed to pay interest, with crypto companies opposing a ban and banks supporting it. Moody's analyst Abhi Srivastava states that, for now, stablecoins do not pose a significant threat to traditional banks due to existing efficient payment systems and the current prohibition on yield-bearing stablecoins. This limits their appeal for pulling deposits from banks at scale. However, with the stablecoin market cap exceeding $300 billion and growth in tokenized assets, banks could face future pressure from deposit outflows. The crypto industry warns that failure to pass the bill could lead to stricter regulatory crackdowns. Negotiations continue with little progress, despite both sides desiring a resolution.

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Stablecoin Hype Overblown? Moody’s Says Banks Aren’t In Danger

bitcoinistHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros