Cutting Off OpenAI, Anthropic Acquires the Tool Provider Used by a Quarter of Global Developers

marsbitPublicado a 2026-05-21Actualizado a 2026-05-21

Resumen

Anthropic has acquired Stainless, a developer tool company that automatically generated official SDKs (Software Development Kits) for AI giants including OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and Cloudflare. The deal, reportedly valued at around $300 million, marks a strategic shift for Anthropic as it builds its "AI agent" infrastructure. Stainless acted as a "translator," converting complex API specifications into ready-to-use code libraries for developers. Its tools indirectly reached about a quarter of professional software developers globally. Following the acquisition, Stainless will shut down its public products and its team will join Anthropic to focus on internal platform development, notably for the Claude Platform. Existing SDKs remain with their respective client companies but will no longer receive updates from Stainless. This move is part of Anthropic's broader 18-month strategy to assemble a complete "agent stack." The stack consists of the Claude model at its core, the newly acquired Stainless for standardized API interfaces, and the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open standard for connecting agents to external tools and data. This contrasts with OpenAI's focus on model generations and consumer-scale compute. Anthropic believes an agent's ultimate utility depends on its ability to connect to external systems. By internalizing the SDK layer and promoting MCP as a connection standard, Anthropic aims to lock in long-term ecosystem advantages and create path dependency, m...

You may not have heard of Stainless, but if you've used the official SDKs of Claude, OpenAI, or Cloudflare, you've likely indirectly used code it generated.

Beyond OpenAI and Anthropic, Stainless's client list includes Meta, Groq, Runway, Cerebras, and others, covering nearly all the top players in AI infrastructure.

It acts as a "translator" between large models and developers: converting obscure API specifications into ready-to-use code libraries for developers.

Now, Anthropic has acquired Stainless, with both companies announcing the completion of the acquisition.

The Stainless founding team will join Anthropic, and Stainless will begin sunsetting its managed products, including the SDK generator.

This is not a simple tool company acquisition.

In its official blog post about acquiring Stainless, Anthropic mentioned that the upper limit of an agent's capabilities depends on how many external systems it can connect to: acquiring Stainless is about strengthening the agent's interfaces.

The AI frontier is shifting from models that can only answer questions to agents that can proactively execute tasks—and an agent's capabilities depend on the systems it can reach. Acquiring Stainless is precisely to expand this reach further.

If we place this acquisition within the context of Anthropic's actions over the past 18 months, the three-piece agent suite is now complete: Claude is the model, Stainless is the interface, and MCP is the connection.

The Company That Wrote SDKs for Multiple AI Giants Has Been Bought by Anthropic

Stainless was founded in New York in 2022 by Alex Rattray, who came from Stripe, where he led the redesign of the API documentation and personally built Stripe's SDK code generation system.

During user research, he discovered that developers never directly call API endpoints: for them, the SDK is the API itself.

This insight directly led him to later found Stainless, turning that capability into a product.

Stainless founder Alex Rattray

Developers feed it an OpenAPI specification, and it outputs official SDKs in Python, TypeScript, Go, Java, Ruby, and other languages.

The model company only needs to maintain one API description; Stainless handles all language versions, error handling, retry logic, documentation generation, and more.

OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Cloudflare, DocuSign, Square—these AI giants or software vendors are all Stainless clients.

Open the GitHub repository for OpenAI's official Python SDK, and the README states: "Generated by Stainless based on the OpenAPI specification."

Similarly, the header of any source file in the Anthropic SDK also states: "Automatically generated by Stainless from the OpenAPI specification."

This means that over the past few years, OpenAI and Anthropic, as rivals, have long used the same developer tool platform for their official SDK generation.

After the acquisition, Stainless founder Alex Rattray informed existing clients that all previously generated SDKs fully belong to the clients, who can modify and extend them independently, but Stainless will no longer provide subsequent support.

The Stainless team will continue working as an internal organization within Anthropic, focusing on building out Claude Platform capabilities and connecting agents to APIs.

https://www.stainless.com/blog/stainless-is-joining-anthropic/

This tool company's products indirectly reached about a quarter of professional software developers worldwide. On its first day joining Anthropic, it closed its doors to the entire industry: from a shared infrastructure to an internal department of Anthropic.

The Agent Three-Piece Suite Is Complete: Model, Interface, Connection

This acquisition is not an isolated event.

Placing the Stainless acquisition back on the strategic path Anthropic has taken over the past 18 months reveals a completed three-piece suite.

The foundational layer is the model.

From Claude 3.5 Sonnet all the way to Claude 4.7, programming and agent capabilities have been consistent differentiators for Anthropic. Claude Code has also become one of the most popular programming agents among developers this past year.

The middle layer is the interface.

Stainless's SDK auto-generation capability makes it possible for agents to call various APIs using a unified specification. This layer was previously outsourced; now it's brought in-house at Anthropic.

The top layer is the connection.

In November 2024, Anthropic open-sourced MCP (Model Context Protocol), standardizing how models connect to external data sources, tools, and file systems, so agents don't need to write separate adapters for every external service.

After MCP was open-sourced, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Cursor, and Replit announced support. MCP is evolving into an agent connectivity standard.

And Stainless can directly generate an MCP server from an API specification. The model is the brain, the interface is the nerve endings, and the connection standard is the protocol that links them. Combined, these three pieces form a functional agent machine.

Katelyn Lesse, Head of Platform Engineering at Anthropic, stated plainly: "How useful an agent is depends on what it can connect to."

Stainless founder and CEO Alex Rattray said that Anthropic was one of the earliest teams to bet on Stainless, and "bringing the two teams together was an easy decision."

This acquisition is the final move in a strategic game that began 18 months ago.

Why Is an "SDK Translation Company" Worth $300 Million?

According to a previous report by The Information, the negotiation amount for this acquisition was at least $300 million. Anthropic has not disclosed the specific figure officially, but even this magnitude is enough to make people reevaluate the value of the SDK layer.

In the past, SDKs were an insignificant engineering problem.

The API was the model company's business; the SDK was just a "wrapper layer" translating the API into various programming languages. Model companies could write it themselves or outsource it to Stainless; no one cared.

But the agent era is different. When Claude or GPT acts as an agent to call third-party services, the SDK is no longer a "tool for humans to read" but an "interface for agents to use."

Whether an agent task succeeds largely depends on whether every API's SDK it calls is robust: is error handling complete? Is retry logic reasonable? Are parameter definitions strict? Are types inferable?

Any non-standard SDK can cause an agent to get stuck mid-task.

If the reported $300 million negotiation amount is accurate, what Anthropic sees is clearly not just an SDK generator, but the developer interface infrastructure layer between APIs and agents.

There's a subtler point: The official SDKs of companies like OpenAI, Meta, and Cloudflare were all previously generated by Stainless.

On the first day after the acquisition, with Stainless closing its doors externally, these companies face a practical problem: will they take over SDK maintenance themselves, or find another supplier?

So far, none have responded to this question.

OpenAI Doubles Down on Models, Anthropic Secures the Foundation

Looking back at the final ASI showdown between the two giants, OpenAI and Anthropic have distinct strategic focuses.

OpenAI's focus is on model generations and compute investment.

From GPT-5, GPT-5.4 to GPT-5.5 incremental updates, the Stargate project's massive compute procurement, ChatGPT's weekly active users growing from 400 million a year ago to 900 million—it concentrates resources on the consumer-facing entry point and the model itself.

Anthropic is taking a different path: enterprise agent infrastructure. Strengthening developer tools with Claude Code, standardizing the connection protocol with MCP, and now bringing the SDK layer in-house with Stainless.

The underlying logic of these two paths is completely different.

The model layer follows a logic of generational disruption: when the next generation arrives, the previous generation's advantages can vanish instantly. The gaps between generations are shrinking, windows are getting shorter, and can only be achieved through compute and data.

The infrastructure layer's logic is the opposite. Once established as a de facto standard, the compounding returns are long-term. With MCP now adopted industry-wide, each new adopter adds switching costs. Once the SDK layer is internalized within Anthropic, the entire agent ecosystem could develop a path dependency on Anthropic's interface specifications.

According to Digital Applied statistics, the number of public MCP servers grew from 1,200 in Q1 2025 to over 9,400 by April 2026, with 78% of enterprise AI teams deploying at least one MCP agent in production.

The gap in model capabilities is becoming easier to close.

Once this connection layer gateway is locked, it becomes very hard to bypass.

References:

https://www.anthropic.com/news/anthropic-acquires-stainless

https://www.stainless.com/blog/stainless-is-joining-anthropic/

https://www.digitalapplied.com/blog/mcp-adoption-statistics-2026-model-context-protocol

This article is from the WeChat public account "AI Era", author: ASI Revelation

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of Stainless as described in the article, and why was it significant for AI companies?

AStainless acts as a 'translator' between complex API specifications and developers, automatically generating official SDKs in multiple programming languages. It was significant for AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic because it allowed them to maintain just one API description while Stainless handled all language versions, error handling, retry logic, and documentation, greatly simplifying developer integration.

QWhy did Anthropic acquire Stainless, according to the article's analysis of their strategic roadmap?

AAnthropic acquired Stainless to strengthen its 'agent' infrastructure. The article states that an agent's usefulness depends on what it can connect to. By bringing Stainless in-house, Anthropic gains control over the 'interface' layer—the SDKs that agents use to call APIs—completing its 'agent trifecta' of model (Claude), interface (Stainless), and connection protocol (MCP).

QWhat immediate impact does the acquisition have on Stainless's existing clients, such as OpenAI and Meta?

AThe acquisition means Stainless will begin winding down its hosted products, including the SDK generator. While existing clients retain full ownership of previously generated SDKs and can modify them, Stainless will no longer provide future support or updates. These companies must now decide whether to maintain the SDKs themselves or find an alternative supplier.

QHow does the article contrast the strategic focuses of OpenAI and Anthropic in the AI race?

AThe article contrasts their strategies: OpenAI focuses on model generation leaps and massive compute investment (e.g., GPT-5 series, Stargate project) to dominate the consumer-facing market. Anthropic focuses on building enterprise-grade agent infrastructure, strengthening developer tools (Claude Code), standardizing the connection protocol (MCP), and now internalizing the SDK layer (Stainless) to create long-term ecosystem lock-in.

QWhat is MCP, and why is its growth cited as important for Anthropic's strategy?

AMCP (Model Context Protocol) is an open-source protocol standardized by Anthropic for connecting AI models to external data sources, tools, and file systems. Its growth is important because it's becoming a de facto standard for agent connectivity. With a reported increase from 1,200 to over 9,400 public servers and widespread enterprise adoption, it creates network effects and switching costs, solidifying Anthropic's position in the agent infrastructure layer.

Lecturas Relacionadas

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片