Crypto.com says market maker boosts liquidity, denies trading edge on customers

cointelegraphPublicado a 2025-12-23Actualizado a 2025-12-23

Resumen

Crypto.com is establishing an internal market-making team to support its expansion into prediction markets, a move it states is fully compliant with regulations and designed to boost liquidity. The company denies its internal team has any unfair advantage, asserting it does not get a "first look" at customer orders or proprietary data. It emphasized that all market makers operate under the same rules to ensure fairness and that proprietary trading is not a revenue source. The practice is common among competitors like Kalshi and Polymarket, which also use market makers to provide liquidity.

Cryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com is building an internal market-making team as part of its expansion into prediction markets, a move the company says is fully aligned with federal regulations and intended to improve liquidity, even as market-making in outcome-based trading continues to draw scrutiny.

Bloomberg reported Tuesday that the exchange is recruiting for a new role on its market-making desk, citing a job posting for a “quant trader” who would help buy and sell contracts tied to the outcomes of sporting events on Crypto.com’s prediction platform.

Source: Bloomberg

The report has drawn attention to the practice of exchanges facilitating trading against customer orders, a structure that can raise questions about conflicts of interest as prediction markets gain traction across both crypto and traditional finance.

In a statement to Cointelegraph, a Crypto.com spokesperson said the company’s internal trading team is fully disclosed to the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission and makes markets across its North American derivatives business.

“The bottom line for customers is [that] more competition and liquidity on the platform creates a better overall experience,” the spokesperson said, adding that internal and external market makers operate under the same rules to ensure market fairness and integrity.

“No market maker at Crypto.com gets a ‘first look’, and our internal market maker does not have access to proprietary data or customer order flow before other market makers or market participants,” the spokesperson said.

They added that Crypto.com does not rely on proprietary trading as a revenue source. “We have a simple business model providing our retail customers access to digital assets for a fee, while staying risk neutral," they said.

Related: Phantom taps Kalshi to offer regulated prediction markets in wallet

Market-making isn’t unique to Crypto.com

Crypto.com is not the only prediction-market operator to rely on market makers to support liquidity.

The Bloomberg report noted that competitors such as Kalshi and Polymarket also use professional trading companies or dedicated liquidity providers to facilitate trading on their platforms.

Kalshi, which operates a federally regulated event-contract exchange, relies on designated market makers rather than a purely peer-to-peer order book, and those arrangements have largely been public. It has been reported that quantitative trading company Susquehanna International Group has provided market-making services to Kalshi since 2024, helping supply liquidity as trading volumes surged.

Polymarket, a decentralized prediction market that drew widespread attention during the US presidential election for accurately predicting the outcome, is also building an internal market-making unit, according to Bloomberg.

Polymarket’s monthly volumes began to surge in the run-up to the 2024 US presidential election. Source: Dune

Related: DraftKings eyes crypto offerings as it expands into prediction markets

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the primary reason Crypto.com is building an internal market-making team, according to the company?

ACrypto.com states that building an internal market-making team is intended to improve liquidity and create a better overall experience for customers, and it is fully aligned with federal regulations.

QHow does Crypto.com address concerns about conflicts of interest and unfair advantages for its internal market maker?

ACrypto.com states that its internal market maker does not get a 'first look' at proprietary data or customer order flow before other market participants, and all market makers operate under the same rules to ensure fairness and integrity.

QBesides Crypto.com, which other prediction-market operators use market makers to support liquidity, as mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions that competitors such as Kalshi and Polymarket also use professional trading companies or dedicated liquidity providers to facilitate trading on their platforms.

QWhat is Crypto.com's stated business model regarding proprietary trading and revenue?

ACrypto.com states that it does not rely on proprietary trading as a revenue source and has a simple business model of providing retail customers access to digital assets for a fee while staying risk neutral.

QWhich quantitative trading company has been reported to provide market-making services to Kalshi since 2024?

AQuantitative trading company Susquehanna International Group has been reported to provide market-making services to Kalshi since 2024.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Will MicroStrategy Fall Into a Death Spiral? How Will the Macro Outlook Evolve in the Second Half of the Year?

**Summary:** The discussion centers on recent Bitcoin price declines and the evolving financial strategy of MicroStrategy (MSTR). The core argument is that the primary pressure is not from one-off Bitcoin sales by MSTR, but from the market's new expectation that MSTR may need to engage in *sustained, small-scale* Bitcoin sales to cover cash flow obligations for its growing portfolio of preferred shares and debt instruments (like STRC). This shift is driven by its stated goal of maintaining "bitcoins per share neutrality." The market is now testing whether it can absorb this potential ongoing selling pressure without entering a severe "death spiral" with Bitcoin's price. A resolution may involve MSTR softening its approach to avoid damaging both its stock and Bitcoin. The conversation then explores the parallel rise of AI-related stocks. The guest posits that AI is fundamentally restructuring labor, with "tokens" (representing access to AI models/compute) becoming a new form of capital and a substitute for human execution. This drives corporate efficiency and profits, benefiting upstream hardware providers (semiconductors, data centers), which explains the sustained rally. This represents the early stages of a "machine economy." Regarding crypto exchanges offering US stock trading, this is seen as a natural evolution. With few crypto-native assets generating lasting value, exchanges are pivoting to distribute valuable real-world assets (RWAs). This doesn't necessarily harm crypto's long-term prospects, as blockchain infrastructure may become crucial for future machine-to-machine economies. The analysis concludes that the era of rampant altcoin speculation is likely over, heavily damaged by the liquidity shock of the "1011" event (likely referring to a major market crash). Meme-driven capital has largely migrated to US equities. Looking ahead, macroeconomic uncertainty is rising due to potential large IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and the US elections. While short-term market corrections are possible, the long-term trends of AI-driven productivity gains and the maturation of blockchain towards real-world utility and institutional adoption remain intact.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Will MicroStrategy Fall Into a Death Spiral? How Will the Macro Outlook Evolve in the Second Half of the Year?

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Will MicroStrategy Fall into a Death Spiral? What Will the Macro Trend Be in the Second Half of the Year?

The podcast features investor Didier discussing the recent Bitcoin downturn and the evolving strategy of MicroStrategy (MSTR). He argues the core pressure is not macro factors or ETF outflows, but the market pricing in an expectation that MSTR will engage in continuous, small-scale Bitcoin sales to fund its increasing preferred stock and debt obligations under its "bitcoin-per-share neutrality" principle. This creates a structural headwind. However, he is cautiously optimistic a "death spiral" is avoidable without new major shocks, as market support is likely to emerge at a certain price point. Didier then posits that the AI-driven bull market in US stocks (semiconductors, data centers) is fundamentally driven by AI agents and tokens becoming the "new labor force," displacing human roles and boosting corporate margins. This shift toward a machine economy is still in its early stages. He comments on crypto exchanges adding US stock trading, viewing it as a natural move toward valuable real-world assets as truly valuable crypto-native assets remain scarce. For crypto-native traders, he suggests existing strategies (e.g., meme-chasing or value investing) can translate to similar assets in US markets. The discussion notes the severe liquidity damage from the "1011 event" (likely referring to a major market crash) has essentially ended the altcoin cycle, with speculative momentum shifting to the more liquid US stock market. Regarding the macroeconomic outlook for H2 2024, Didier expresses increased caution due to potential market pressure from upcoming mega-IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and US midterm election risks. Long-term, he remains bullish on AI's productivity gains and its convergence with blockchain/Web3, which he sees maturing into a more institutional, real-asset-focused phase.

链捕手Hace 6 min(s)

Will MicroStrategy Fall into a Death Spiral? What Will the Macro Trend Be in the Second Half of the Year?

链捕手Hace 6 min(s)

Dylan Patel: Founder of SemiAnalysis, Praised by Jensen Huang, is a 'Beekeeper' and 'Forum Enthusiast'

Dylan Patel, founder of the independent research firm SemiAnalysis, has an unconventional background. A former beekeeper from rural Georgia, he entered the semiconductor world as a self-taught "forum warrior," discussing chip technology anonymously online from a young age. He launched the SemiAnalysis blog in May 2020, which later transitioned to a paid subscription model. The firm has grown from a one-person operation to a global team of around 60, with a dedicated teardown lab. Its detailed, technically-focused analysis on semiconductor supply chains, AI infrastructure, and products has earned significant industry recognition. Notably, NVIDIA founder Jensen Huang has publicly cited their reports. In a landmark case, a critical 2024 report on AMD's MI300X GPU software stack led to a 90-minute call with AMD CEO Lisa Su, who thanked him for the constructive feedback. SemiAnalysis later acknowledged AMD's improvements. The firm's influence on markets was seen when a report on NVIDIA's Rubin memory configuration was partially shared, affecting memory stock prices. Dylan Patel emphasized the importance of context, contrasting the shared excerpt with the report's actual title. SemiAnalysis, now a multi-faceted consultancy with revenue projected to reach $100 million, is known for its deep technical insights that influence major industry players and investment decisions.

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Dylan Patel: Founder of SemiAnalysis, Praised by Jensen Huang, is a 'Beekeeper' and 'Forum Enthusiast'

marsbitHace 56 min(s)

Dylan Patel: SemiAnalysis, Praised by Jensen Huang, is Founded by a 'Beekeeper and Forum Warrior'

Dylan Patel, founder of the independent research firm SemiAnalysis, has an unconventional background. Growing up in rural Georgia, he later worked as a beekeeper in Minnesota. His entry into semiconductors began as a self-taught "forum warrior," engaging anonymously in online tech communities from a young age. In May 2020, he started the SemiAnalysis blog on WordPress, later moving it to Substack as a paid subscription service. The firm has since evolved from a one-person operation into a global company with around 60 employees, featuring a dedicated chip teardown lab. Its revenue, reaching $20 million last year, is projected to surpass $100 million this year. SemiAnalysis is highly regarded in the AI and semiconductor industry for its deep technical analysis. NVIDIA founder Jensen Huang has publicly praised its reports. In a notable instance, a critical report on AMD's MI300X GPU software shortcomings prompted a 90-minute call with CEO Lisa Su, who thanked Patel for the "constructive feedback." A later report acknowledged AMD's subsequent improvements. The firm's analyses have significant market impact. For example, a June report discussing potential memory configuration changes in NVIDIA's next-generation servers was cited as a factor in pressure on memory-related stocks. Patel plans to establish a venture capital firm, having already made personal investments in about 20 startups. SemiAnalysis combines roles as a consultancy, model platform, and tech lab, focusing on the practical bottlenecks in AI infrastructure.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Dylan Patel: SemiAnalysis, Praised by Jensen Huang, is Founded by a 'Beekeeper and Forum Warrior'

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Ethereum Q1 Report: On-chain Activity Hits Record High, Tokenized Assets Lead the Industry

Ethereum Q1 2026 Report: On-chain activity hits record high, tokenized assets lead the industry. In Q1 2026, Ethereum's network experienced a unique divergence: on-chain activity soared while USD-denominated metrics declined. Monthly active users reached 13.2 million, transactions hit 200.4 million, and TPS averaged 25.78, all setting new highs. However, total value locked (TVL) fell 11.0% to $316.2B, DEX volume dropped 24.0% to $134.5B, and ETH's fully diluted market cap fell 30.3% to $290B. A key driver was the Blob Parameter Fork (BPO#2) in January, which increased data capacity and caused a sharp 47.9% drop in layer-1 transaction fees despite higher usage. Etherean's tokenized asset market cap reached $203.4B, up 42.9% year-over-year. While stablecoins ($178.9B) saw a slight dip, tokenized funds ($19.4B, +73.1% YoY), commodities ($4.7B, +325.9% YoY), and stocks ($365.1M) grew strongly. Ethereum dominates cross-chain comparisons, holding 71% of TVL, 79.2% of active loans, 61.8% of stablecoins, and 73% of tokenized funds among top chains. The report highlights a "Jevons Paradox" scenario: network expansion reduces per-transaction costs but unleashes latent demand, driving long-term growth. Ethereum's strategy mirrors Amazon's early focus on scale over profit. Its open, neutral foundation is seen as critical for institutional adoption, as evidenced by growing activity from firms like BlackRock and JPMorgan. The roadmap targets further scalability, aiming for thousands of TPS by 2029 to solidify its role as a global financial settlement layer.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Ethereum Q1 Report: On-chain Activity Hits Record High, Tokenized Assets Lead the Industry

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片