Crypto.com Exchange Integrates with TradingView for Direct Multi-Asset Trading

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-06-03Actualizado a 2026-06-03

Resumen

Crypto.com Exchange has integrated with TradingView as an official broker, enabling its users to trade directly through TradingView's charting platform by linking their exchange accounts. This integration establishes Crypto.com Exchange as a multi-asset platform on TradingView, allowing qualified traders to execute trades on a wide range of assets directly from their charts. The available assets include traditional stocks and commodities, pre-IPO perpetual contracts, and on-chain assets like tokenized real-world assets (RWAs). The move combines Crypto.com's high-performance trading infrastructure with TradingView's advanced analytics, allowing users to perform market analysis and place trades within a single platform. Eric Anziani, President and COO of Crypto.com, stated that the integration provides a seamless experience, enabling instant transition from analysis to execution with access to deep liquidity, real-time data, and innovative asset classes. This builds upon Crypto.com Exchange's existing market data presence on TradingView, offering enhanced access for traders who utilize the platform for technical analysis and research.

Today, the Crypto.com Exchange announced that it has integrated with TradingView as an official broker, allowing customers to trade directly via TradingView’s worldwide charting platform and securely link their Crypto.com Exchange accounts.

With this integration, the Crypto.com Exchange becomes an official multi-asset platform on TradingView. With the help of this feature, qualified users may now trade a wide range of assets directly on TradingView charts, including conventional assets like stocks and commodities, pre-IPO perpetual contracts, and on-chain assets like tokenized real-world assets (RWAs).

By combining the high-performance trading infrastructure of the Crypto.com Exchange with TradingView’s sophisticated analytics package, this milestone enables traders to do market analysis and trade inside the TradingView platform.

“Integrating the Crypto.com Exchange with TradingView brings together two powerful platforms to deliver a seamless trading experience,” said Eric Anziani, President and Chief Operating Officer of Crypto.com. “Traders may now move from analysis to execution instantly while accessing deep liquidity, real-time market data, and cutting-edge asset classes like RWAs and commodity perpetuals directly from their charts.”

The integration increases access for traders who use TradingView for technical charting and market research, building on the Crypto.com Exchange’s current market data presence on TradingView. Go to https://crypto.com/exchange for further details.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat major announcement did Crypto.com Exchange make regarding TradingView?

ACrypto.com Exchange announced its integration with TradingView as an official broker, allowing customers to trade directly through the TradingView platform and link their exchange accounts securely.

QWhat types of assets can qualified users now trade directly on TradingView charts through this integration?

AQualified users can trade a wide range of assets, including conventional assets like stocks and commodities, pre-IPO perpetual contracts, and on-chain assets like tokenized real-world assets (RWAs).

QAccording to Eric Anziani, what key benefits does this integration offer to traders?

AEric Anziani stated that the integration allows traders to move from analysis to execution instantly, accessing deep liquidity, real-time market data, and cutting-edge asset classes directly from their charts.

QHow does this partnership combine the strengths of both Crypto.com Exchange and TradingView?

AIt combines Crypto.com Exchange's high-performance trading infrastructure with TradingView's sophisticated analytics package, enabling traders to conduct market analysis and execute trades within the TradingView platform.

QWhere can users go to find more details about the Crypto.com Exchange?

AUsers can go to https://crypto.com/exchange for further details.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHace 38 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHace 42 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHace 42 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 50 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Trading

Spot