Crypto Tycoons Grace the Cover of 'Vanity Fair', Only to Face Widespread Ridicule Online

比推Publicado a 2026-03-18Actualizado a 2026-03-18

Resumen

Crypto industry leaders, including Cathie Wood (ARK Invest), Olaf Carlson-Wee (Polychain), and Michael Novogratz (Galaxy Digital), were featured in a *Vanity Fair* cover story titled “Crypto’s True Believers Want to Be Taken Seriously.” However, the article and its accompanying photos were widely mocked across social media. Rather than portraying the figures as serious innovators, the publication depicted them as eccentric and out-of-touch billionaires—highlighting their interests in extraterrestrial life, extreme survivalism, and going barefoot in public. Critics within the crypto community accused *Vanity Fair* of intentional ridicule, pointing to unflattering photo compositions and dismissive writing that reinforced negative stereotypes. The piece has sparked debate about the crypto industry’s relationship with mainstream media. Some, like Noelle Acheson, acknowledged the awkward portrayal but suggested it reflects how the industry is perceived externally. Others, including Jinelle D’Lima of Nozomi, argued that seeking validation from traditional gateways like *Vanity Fair* contradicts crypto’s original anti-establishment ethos. The incident underscores a cultural disconnect: despite the industry’s financial influence and political lobbying, it remains marginalized in mainstream cultural narratives. The backlash serves as a reminder that crypto’s real strength lies in its technology and decentralized values—not in mainstream approval.

Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher

Original Title: Overnight, Crypto Tycoons Were Severely Played by 'Vanity Fair'

Overnight, a group photo of crypto tycoons flooded the X timelines of all crypto practitioners, accompanied by overwhelming ridicule and criticism.

The main subjects in the picture include industry heavyweights such as ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood, Polychain founder Olaf Carlson-Wee, and Galaxy Digital founder Michael Novogratz, but this still couldn't stop the storm from escalating even further.

Upon closer examination of this group photo, it becomes clear that it is a work from the venerable celebrity magazine 'Vanity Fair,' featured on the cover of its latest issue's report titled 'Cryptocurrency's True Believers Demand to Be Taken Seriously.'

This article, through close observation of the industry's core circle, delves into how the crypto industry, after enduring multiple rounds of regulatory storms and market crashes, is attempting to redefine the global power landscape in 2026 with massive political donations and a 'savior-like' grand narrative.

Although the stories of crypto industry tycoons have already appeared in a series of traditional magazines such as 'Fortune' and 'The New York Times,' 'Vanity Fair,' as a media outlet deeply versed in celebrity culture, clearly has a more 'sinister' reporting perspective. The article doesn't dwell too much on complex industry trends but instead spends a significant amount of ink on the starkly contrasting private life details of these 'power redefiners.'

In the author's portrayal, these billionaires are depicted as a group of eccentrics who are both detached from reality and eager to dominate it: on one hand, they discuss the future of human civilization in mansions in Puerto Rico, while on the other, they are obsessed with searching for extraterrestrial life, practicing extreme survivalism, and even often going barefoot in public.

Triple Crown Digital partner Noelle Acheson commented on this, saying, 'We can laugh all we want (and we really do want to laugh) at these 'Vanity Fair' photos, at the awkward poses and perplexing character portrayals... but the deeper question is: Is this how the mainstream media views the cryptocurrency industry? If so, we have a lot of work to do.'

In the eyes of most industry insiders, this article not only fails to positively portray the image of cryptocurrency practitioners but also highlights stereotypes about the crypto industry.

Tally co-founder Dennison Bertram further revealed that this article is 'Vanity Fair' magazine deliberately mocking cryptocurrency and its related figures, with both the text and photos filled with deep disdain and sarcasm. Before getting involved in cryptocurrency, he had worked as a fashion photographer for over a decade.

Analyzing Cathie Wood's close-up photo as an example, he said, 'Here, Cathie Wood is deliberately made to appear small. The camera shoots down on her, and the composition deliberately downplays her stature. The messy curtains, her crossed ankles, and the intentionally placed luggage cart all contribute to the deliberately created冷酷无情 (cold and ruthless) atmosphere in the picture. Could there be a more mean-spirited visual effect than this?'

Looking at Michael Novogratz's photo, 'His eyes are squinted, looking fierce. Why? Because he's wearing glasses. He's holding them, almost invisible. His face is deliberately cast in shadow, appearing very menacing. It's another mess, everything is crooked, nothing is整齐划一 (neat and uniform). Is this a positive image? I don't think so at all.'

A group of tycoons who rose to the top through the crypto industry originally attempted to seek more recognition and support from the outside world through 'Vanity Fair' magazine, but they didn't realize it was a huge 'trap,' instead appearing as clown-like figures in the public eye. This is undoubtedly a painful lesson.

At this point, the act of seeking recognition in mainstream magazines itself has become a target of criticism. Nozomi founder Jinelle D'Lima believes that Satoshi Nakamoto and the cypherpunks never sought approval. 'The key point is, you don't need their approval: capital flows don't need it, network operation doesn't need it, the functioning of everything doesn't need it. We weren't built to cater to 'Vanity Fair' or 'Forbes.' We were built to resist everything they represent: gatekeepers, the system, and those who decide what is legitimate and what is illegal.'

'Now we're on the cover. Could it be any more ironic? This isn't like us. We were never supposed to be these people,' Jinelle D'Lima said.

The reason 'Vanity Fair's' report has become a vortex of controversy is that it reveals an awkward predicament for the crypto industry: even if the industry tries to exchange astronomical political donations and 'capitulation' to the mainstream financial system for 'serious treatment' from mainstream circles, within the aesthetic and value systems of mainstream culture, these nouveau riche are still viewed as a subcultural group with cult-like overtones.

This PR disaster might be telling everyone: the true power of the crypto industry has never been in the glossy reports of mainstream media, but in the code that can operate just fine without needing to be 'taken seriously.'

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620917

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did the group photo of crypto leaders on the cover of Vanity Fair spark widespread ridicule online?

AThe photo and accompanying article portrayed crypto leaders as eccentric and out-of-touch billionaires, highlighting their unconventional lifestyles and using unflattering visual compositions, which many in the industry felt reinforced negative perceptions and stereotypes.

QWhat was the main criticism from industry experts like Dennison Bertram regarding Vanity Fair's portrayal of crypto leaders?

ADennison Bertram, a former fashion photographer, criticized the magazine for intentionally mocking the figures through deliberate visual choices, such as unflattering angles, messy backgrounds, and shadowy lighting, which made them appear awkward or sinister.

QHow did the Vanity Fair article describe the private lives of crypto billionaires?

AThe article depicted them as 'weirdos' who are disconnected from reality yet aspire to dominate it, mentioning their interests in topics like alien life, extreme survivalism, and often going barefoot in public, while discussing humanity's future from luxury homes in Puerto Rico.

QWhat deeper issue did Noelle Acheson highlight about the Vanity Fair coverage?

ANoelle Acheson pointed out that the deeper issue is whether this portrayal reflects how mainstream media views the cryptocurrency industry, suggesting that if so, the industry still has significant work to do to improve its image and understanding.

QAccording to Jinelle D'Lima, why is seeking validation from mainstream publications like Vanity Fair contrary to crypto's original ethos?

AJinelle D'Lima argued that figures like Satoshi Nakamoto and cypherpunks never sought approval, as crypto was built to resist gatekeepers, institutions, and those who decide legitimacy—not to conform to mainstream validation through publications like Vanity Fair or Forbes.

Lecturas Relacionadas

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

Anthropomorphic "Teletubby" robot offers cleaning services in San Francisco at $30/hour, but it's entirely remote-controlled. The robot, created by startup Tau Robotics, can perform household tasks like washing hands, mopping floors, and taking out trash. While the initial demo videos appear impressive and are notably shown at normal speed (unlike many sped-up robot demos), the company reveals the actions are performed via human teleoperation, not autonomous AI. Tau Robotics, founded in 2024, argues this "cheat" is a strategic way to bridge the current capability gap, ensure task completion, and collect real-world home data to eventually train autonomous systems. Their service features three robot models: Chelsea for kitchens/bathrooms, Elon for regular tidying with memory, and Tony for deep cleaning. Priced at $30 per hour, it's cheaper than average human cleaners in the US. The article discusses the broader challenge of deploying humanoid robots in homes, comparing Tau's approach to others like China's Ziliang and the US's 1X Neo, which also use teleoperation. A key reason for choosing a humanoid form is to make remote control more intuitive for human operators. The piece also notes the potential "emotional value" of having a humanoid servant. The service is currently invite-only in San Francisco.

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

"Teletubbies" Robot Cleaning Service, $30/Hour, Pure·Manual·Intelligence

marsbitHace 11 min(s)

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbitHace 55 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

Qualcomm reported its Q3 FY2026 results (ending June 2026), with revenue of $9.95B, down 4% YoY but above expectations. Gross margin declined to 53.1%, pressured by rising costs across manufacturing and memory. Key business segments showed mixed performance: Handset revenue fell 19.6% YoY to $5.09B, dragged by an 11% decline in non-Apple Android shipments and weaker high-end mix. Conversely, Automotive revenue surged 61% to $1.59B, and IoT grew 9% to $1.83B. Core operating profit dropped 41% YoY due to margin compression and higher expenses. Management's Q4 FY2026 guidance projects revenue of $9.7B-$10.5B, in line with consensus, but Non-GAAP EPS guidance of $2.05-$2.25 fell short of expectations. Amidst persistent weakness in its core handset market, Qualcomm is pursuing growth in AI, focusing on Edge AI (smartphones, PCs, automotive) and Data Center AI. Its data center strategy includes four pillars: AI accelerators (e.g., AI200), commercial CPUs (Dragonfly C1000), custom silicon, and connectivity solutions. While these initiatives initially boosted its stock, concerns over AI capital expenditure sustainability have since erased those gains. The company targets $5B in data center revenue for FY2027 and $15B for FY2029. The report concludes that with the traditional handset business still under pressure, the data center opportunity is currently viewed as a longer-term option, and a more conservative valuation based on core operations may be warranted until AI contributions materialize.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Qualcomm: AI Hype Subsides, When Will Smartphones Emerge from the Gloom?

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

At the 2026 YC Startup School, Jeff Dean outlined his vision for AI's next phase, shifting focus from simply scaling models to building intelligent, autonomous systems. He believes AI's progress is no longer just about creating smarter models, but about integrating them into systems capable of long-term, iterative work, automated experimentation, and continuous learning. This evolution moves the competition from "who has the bigger model" to "who can best organize intelligence." Dean suggests AI capabilities are now comparable to a junior engineer, enabling the automation of complex workflows. However, the true challenge and opportunity lie in managing these AI "workers" at scale. He emphasizes the importance of **context engineering**—structuring tools, memory, and feedback loops—over raw model power. For startups, this means building deep expertise in niche domains where general models currently fail (near 0-1% success rates), leveraging proprietary data, specialized tools, and domain-specific evaluators. A recurring theme is re-examining fundamental constraints. Dean's past work, like moving Google's search index to memory or creating the TPU, stemmed from questioning outdated assumptions about hardware and cost. He sees similar inflection points today, particularly in **specialized inference hardware** to drastically reduce latency and energy consumption for real-time Agent operation. Notably, he points out that in modern AI systems, the dominant cost is often not computation but **data movement**. Reliable, long-running Agents require robust system design, borrowing concepts from distributed computing like checkpointing, state management, and parallel exploration to handle failures and maintain progress over days or weeks. As AI automates execution, the scarcest human skills will shift to **defining clear specifications**, **judging what problems are worth solving** (taste), and designing effective feedback loops. Ultimately, Dean's framework prioritizes understanding the problem deeply, identifying the true bottlenecks, and systematically building closed-loop systems where AI can not only perform tasks but also improve AI itself.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

From TPU to Self-Evolving Agents: How Jeff Dean Predicts the Next Step in AI

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Coldcard exploit sparks Bitcoin flight, ‘bullish’ crypto consolidation: Hodler’s Digest, August 2

A Coldcard hardware wallet exploit led to estimated losses of 1,367 BTC ($88.6 million), causing a spike in small Bitcoin transfers as users moved funds to centralized exchanges and other custody methods. In U.S. politics, the Clarity Act faces hurdles with time running out for a Senate vote, amid debates over ethics rules and crypto regulation. Major crypto firms like Coinbase reported disappointing Q2 earnings, while an analyst notes the industry is entering a significant consolidation phase, with revenue concentrating in a few dominant protocols like Hyperliquid and Pump.fun. Bitcoin's price decline continued, though some analysts suggest the market may have bottomed. Other news includes Telegram's legal troubles in Russia and Australia, layoffs at Pump.fun ahead of token distributions, and a White House staffer accused of insider betting leaving his post.

cointelegraphHace 1 hora(s)

Coldcard exploit sparks Bitcoin flight, ‘bullish’ crypto consolidation: Hodler’s Digest, August 2

cointelegraphHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot