Crypto Tycoons Grace the Cover of 'Vanity Fair', Only to Face Widespread Ridicule Online

比推Publicado a 2026-03-18Actualizado a 2026-03-18

Resumen

Crypto industry leaders, including Cathie Wood (ARK Invest), Olaf Carlson-Wee (Polychain), and Michael Novogratz (Galaxy Digital), were featured in a *Vanity Fair* cover story titled “Crypto’s True Believers Want to Be Taken Seriously.” However, the article and its accompanying photos were widely mocked across social media. Rather than portraying the figures as serious innovators, the publication depicted them as eccentric and out-of-touch billionaires—highlighting their interests in extraterrestrial life, extreme survivalism, and going barefoot in public. Critics within the crypto community accused *Vanity Fair* of intentional ridicule, pointing to unflattering photo compositions and dismissive writing that reinforced negative stereotypes. The piece has sparked debate about the crypto industry’s relationship with mainstream media. Some, like Noelle Acheson, acknowledged the awkward portrayal but suggested it reflects how the industry is perceived externally. Others, including Jinelle D’Lima of Nozomi, argued that seeking validation from traditional gateways like *Vanity Fair* contradicts crypto’s original anti-establishment ethos. The incident underscores a cultural disconnect: despite the industry’s financial influence and political lobbying, it remains marginalized in mainstream cultural narratives. The backlash serves as a reminder that crypto’s real strength lies in its technology and decentralized values—not in mainstream approval.

Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher

Original Title: Overnight, Crypto Tycoons Were Severely Played by 'Vanity Fair'

Overnight, a group photo of crypto tycoons flooded the X timelines of all crypto practitioners, accompanied by overwhelming ridicule and criticism.

The main subjects in the picture include industry heavyweights such as ARK Invest CEO Cathie Wood, Polychain founder Olaf Carlson-Wee, and Galaxy Digital founder Michael Novogratz, but this still couldn't stop the storm from escalating even further.

Upon closer examination of this group photo, it becomes clear that it is a work from the venerable celebrity magazine 'Vanity Fair,' featured on the cover of its latest issue's report titled 'Cryptocurrency's True Believers Demand to Be Taken Seriously.'

This article, through close observation of the industry's core circle, delves into how the crypto industry, after enduring multiple rounds of regulatory storms and market crashes, is attempting to redefine the global power landscape in 2026 with massive political donations and a 'savior-like' grand narrative.

Although the stories of crypto industry tycoons have already appeared in a series of traditional magazines such as 'Fortune' and 'The New York Times,' 'Vanity Fair,' as a media outlet deeply versed in celebrity culture, clearly has a more 'sinister' reporting perspective. The article doesn't dwell too much on complex industry trends but instead spends a significant amount of ink on the starkly contrasting private life details of these 'power redefiners.'

In the author's portrayal, these billionaires are depicted as a group of eccentrics who are both detached from reality and eager to dominate it: on one hand, they discuss the future of human civilization in mansions in Puerto Rico, while on the other, they are obsessed with searching for extraterrestrial life, practicing extreme survivalism, and even often going barefoot in public.

Triple Crown Digital partner Noelle Acheson commented on this, saying, 'We can laugh all we want (and we really do want to laugh) at these 'Vanity Fair' photos, at the awkward poses and perplexing character portrayals... but the deeper question is: Is this how the mainstream media views the cryptocurrency industry? If so, we have a lot of work to do.'

In the eyes of most industry insiders, this article not only fails to positively portray the image of cryptocurrency practitioners but also highlights stereotypes about the crypto industry.

Tally co-founder Dennison Bertram further revealed that this article is 'Vanity Fair' magazine deliberately mocking cryptocurrency and its related figures, with both the text and photos filled with deep disdain and sarcasm. Before getting involved in cryptocurrency, he had worked as a fashion photographer for over a decade.

Analyzing Cathie Wood's close-up photo as an example, he said, 'Here, Cathie Wood is deliberately made to appear small. The camera shoots down on her, and the composition deliberately downplays her stature. The messy curtains, her crossed ankles, and the intentionally placed luggage cart all contribute to the deliberately created冷酷无情 (cold and ruthless) atmosphere in the picture. Could there be a more mean-spirited visual effect than this?'

Looking at Michael Novogratz's photo, 'His eyes are squinted, looking fierce. Why? Because he's wearing glasses. He's holding them, almost invisible. His face is deliberately cast in shadow, appearing very menacing. It's another mess, everything is crooked, nothing is整齐划一 (neat and uniform). Is this a positive image? I don't think so at all.'

A group of tycoons who rose to the top through the crypto industry originally attempted to seek more recognition and support from the outside world through 'Vanity Fair' magazine, but they didn't realize it was a huge 'trap,' instead appearing as clown-like figures in the public eye. This is undoubtedly a painful lesson.

At this point, the act of seeking recognition in mainstream magazines itself has become a target of criticism. Nozomi founder Jinelle D'Lima believes that Satoshi Nakamoto and the cypherpunks never sought approval. 'The key point is, you don't need their approval: capital flows don't need it, network operation doesn't need it, the functioning of everything doesn't need it. We weren't built to cater to 'Vanity Fair' or 'Forbes.' We were built to resist everything they represent: gatekeepers, the system, and those who decide what is legitimate and what is illegal.'

'Now we're on the cover. Could it be any more ironic? This isn't like us. We were never supposed to be these people,' Jinelle D'Lima said.

The reason 'Vanity Fair's' report has become a vortex of controversy is that it reveals an awkward predicament for the crypto industry: even if the industry tries to exchange astronomical political donations and 'capitulation' to the mainstream financial system for 'serious treatment' from mainstream circles, within the aesthetic and value systems of mainstream culture, these nouveau riche are still viewed as a subcultural group with cult-like overtones.

This PR disaster might be telling everyone: the true power of the crypto industry has never been in the glossy reports of mainstream media, but in the code that can operate just fine without needing to be 'taken seriously.'

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7620917

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy did the group photo of crypto leaders on the cover of Vanity Fair spark widespread ridicule online?

AThe photo and accompanying article portrayed crypto leaders as eccentric and out-of-touch billionaires, highlighting their unconventional lifestyles and using unflattering visual compositions, which many in the industry felt reinforced negative perceptions and stereotypes.

QWhat was the main criticism from industry experts like Dennison Bertram regarding Vanity Fair's portrayal of crypto leaders?

ADennison Bertram, a former fashion photographer, criticized the magazine for intentionally mocking the figures through deliberate visual choices, such as unflattering angles, messy backgrounds, and shadowy lighting, which made them appear awkward or sinister.

QHow did the Vanity Fair article describe the private lives of crypto billionaires?

AThe article depicted them as 'weirdos' who are disconnected from reality yet aspire to dominate it, mentioning their interests in topics like alien life, extreme survivalism, and often going barefoot in public, while discussing humanity's future from luxury homes in Puerto Rico.

QWhat deeper issue did Noelle Acheson highlight about the Vanity Fair coverage?

ANoelle Acheson pointed out that the deeper issue is whether this portrayal reflects how mainstream media views the cryptocurrency industry, suggesting that if so, the industry still has significant work to do to improve its image and understanding.

QAccording to Jinelle D'Lima, why is seeking validation from mainstream publications like Vanity Fair contrary to crypto's original ethos?

AJinelle D'Lima argued that figures like Satoshi Nakamoto and cypherpunks never sought approval, as crypto was built to resist gatekeepers, institutions, and those who decide legitimacy—not to conform to mainstream validation through publications like Vanity Fair or Forbes.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

链捕手Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros