Crypto Scams and Hacks Surge to $370M in January: CertiK

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-02-02Actualizado a 2026-02-02

Resumen

In January, cryptocurrency scams and hacks surged to $370.3 million, marking the highest monthly loss in 11 months and a fourfold increase from January of the previous year. The majority of the stolen funds came from a single social engineering scam that resulted in a $284 million loss. Phishing attacks accounted for over $311.3 million of the total. The month's largest incidents included a $28.9 million hack on Step Finance, a $26.4 million exploit of the Truebit protocol due to a smart contract bug, and a $13.3 million attack on SwapNet. Overall, 16 major hacks were recorded, causing $86.01 million in losses—a slight decrease from the previous year but a 13% rise from December. The figures represent a 214% increase from December's losses and highlight a significant escalation in crypto security breaches.

The total value of stolen cryptocurrencies via exploits and scams extended to $370.3 million last month, the biggest monthly figure hit in 11 months and around a fourfold increase from January of last year.

CertiK, the biggest Web3 security service provider, stated on January 31 that out of 40 scam incidents that happened in January, the major portion of the total value stolen came from one victim that lost about $284 million because of a social engineering scam.

Around over $370 million stolen was accounted for by phishing scams, which stole over $311.3 million over the month. This month’s figure is the biggest loss, followed by the Bybit hack in February 2025.

In February 2025, the hackers swept off around $1.5 billion overall over the month, a major portion of which came from the $1.4 billion hack on crypto exchange Bybit. The recent amount marks over a 277% surge from January 2025, when attackers swept in and stole $98 million.

The Biggest Surge

CertiK also mentioned that it is also a 214% surge from December, witnessing $117.8 million lost to crypto theft. The blockchain security and data analytics company, PeckShield, revealed on February 1 that the hack of Step Finance in the last month of January was the biggest for the month.

Attackers swept $28.9 million in the attack on the decentralised finance portfolio tracker, where a lot of its treasury wallets were risked, having over 261,000 Solana (SOL) taken. After this, the biggest exploit for the month was the $26.4 million attack on the Truebit protocol on January 8, when a bug in a smart contract permitted an attacker to mint tokens almost for free. This also banged the price of the Truebit (TRU) token.

PeckShield also highlighted the $13.3 million hack on liquidity provider SwapNet on January 26 and the $7 million hack against the blockchain protocol Saga on January 21. The firm mentioned that there were around 16 hacks overall in January, equating to $86.01 million in losses, a 1.42% fall from a year ago, but over a 13% rise from December.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

CrossCurve Bridge Exploit Exposes $3 Million Loss in Cross-Chain Security Breach

TagsCertiKHackScam

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the total value of stolen cryptocurrencies in January according to CertiK?

A$370.3 million

QWhich single incident accounted for the majority of the stolen funds in January?

AA social engineering scam that resulted in a loss of about $284 million to one victim.

QWhat was the most significant hack prior to January's surge, as mentioned in the article?

AThe Bybit hack in February 2025, where approximately $1.4 billion was stolen.

QAccording to PeckShield, which was the largest individual hack incident in January?

AThe $28.9 million hack of Step Finance.

QWhat type of attack was responsible for the majority of the stolen funds in January?

APhishing scams, which stole over $311.3 million.

Lecturas Relacionadas

China's Tech Industry Is Crossing the 'Visibility Threshold' in Bulk

China's tech industries are successively crossing a "visibility threshold" into the global market spotlight. This wave, exemplified by AI, robotics, and innovative pharmaceuticals (the "new-new three"), differs from past waves like garments/appliances or EVs/batteries/solar panels. Earlier industries met existing demand, but these new sectors are helping to *define* emerging markets and applications. Crossing this threshold signifies an industry has achieved scale, competitive advantages, rapid growth, and the ability to drive its supply chain. Recent data shows China's AI sector growing over 30%, producing 80% of certain intelligent robots, and a surge in new drug approvals. This acceleration stems from China's industrial evolution from "completeness" to "density": different sectors now share technologies, talent, and infrastructure, enabling capabilities (e.g., from EVs) to rapidly migrate to adjacent fields (e.g., robotics). This dense ecosystem, combined with improved system integration and faster market access, acts as an infrastructure for generating new industries. The nature of competition is also evolving. The visible product is just an interface; long-term advantage lies in the underlying patents, standards, and open ecosystems. While building this "moat," China's approach emphasizes openness—through open-source models and collaborative R&D—to foster wider adoption and iterative improvement. Crossing the visibility line marks the start of market validation. The consecutive emergence of these industry waves signals China is developing a sustained capacity to generate new, globally relevant innovations, shifting from being defined by global narratives to participating in shaping them.

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

China's Tech Industry Is Crossing the 'Visibility Threshold' in Bulk

marsbitHace 21 min(s)

10 Billion Repurchase Fails to Halt HYPE's Decline, Are Core Members and Multicoin Quietly Selling Tokens?

Foresight News reports that despite a massive $1 billion buyback program by the Assistance Fund, the HYPE token has fallen from its July high of $70 to around $52.40. Analyst MLM tracked data showing that since team token vesting began in December 2025, approximately 4.93 million HYPE (worth ~$270M) were allocated to core contributors. Of these, 1.19 million (~$32.5M) were sold on the open market, and 3.14 million (~$132M) were transferred to OTC desks. However, the report argues that direct team selling is not the primary driver of the price decline. In the same period, the protocol's Assistance Fund used 99% of trading fees to repurchase about 9.8 million HYPE for approximately $364 million, a rate more than double the team's selling pressure. The analysis points to other significant factors: major venture capital firms like Multicoin Capital and a16z have been unstaking and moving substantial amounts of HYPE to exchanges, with some confirming sales for portfolio management. Additionally, HYPE spot ETFs have experienced consistent daily net outflows since early July, reversing the strong inflows seen in May and June. The report concludes that while protocol buybacks absorb team selling, declining trading volume reduces this buyback power, and combined selling pressure from large investors and ETFs has significantly impacted the price.

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

10 Billion Repurchase Fails to Halt HYPE's Decline, Are Core Members and Multicoin Quietly Selling Tokens?

marsbitHace 46 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片