Crypto leaders join CFTC panel as U.S. pushes ‘pro-innovation’ rules

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-02-13Actualizado a 2026-02-13

Resumen

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has formed an Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC) under the Trump Administration, comprising leaders from both crypto and traditional finance sectors. Members include executives from Coinbase, Uniswap, Ripple, Chainlink, and Solana, as well as representatives from prediction markets and major financial institutions like Nasdaq and the London Stock Exchange. CFTC Chair Mike Selig stated the committee aims to develop adaptive regulations to keep pace with innovations in blockchain and AI, ensuring the agency’s rules reflect market realities. The move is seen as a shift from the previous administration’s enforcement-heavy approach. Industry leaders, including Uniswap’s Hayden Adams and Chainlink’s Sergey Nazarov, welcomed the initiative as a positive development for DeFi, tokenization, and the broader crypto ecosystem.

The Donald Trump Administration has formed a new advisory team, the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC), filled with crypto and traditional finance leaders to help drive American innovation.

On the 13th of February, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) unveiled the members of the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC).

Players from the crypto industry include Coinbase’s Brian Armstrong, Uniswap’s CEO Hayden Adams, Ripple’s Brad Garlinghouse, Chainlink Labs’ Sergey Nazarov, and Solana’s Anatoly Yakovenko, among others.

On the prediction markets segment, Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan and Kalshi’s Tarek Mansour. Additionally, leaders from sport betting platforms FanDuel and DraftKings were tapped.

On the traditional finance side, Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) CEO Frank LaSalla, London Stock Exchange CEO David Schwimmer, Nasdaq CEO Adena Friedman, and others.

CFTC’s end-game

Academic and interest group representatives are also part of the team to provide a balance on tech updates and breakthroughs. According to CFTC chair Mike Selig, this was an ‘energizing moment’ for the regulator, adding that,

“The IAC’s work will help ensure the CFTC’s decisions reflect market realities so the agency can future-proof its markets and develop clear rules of the road for the Golden Age of American financial markets.”

Selig added that the committee will help CFTC formulate adaptive regulations for new breakthroughs in blockchain and AI that are transforming financial markets. He added,

“By bringing together participants from every corner of the marketplace, the IAC will be a major asset for the Commission as we work to modernize our rules and regulations for the innovations of today and tomorrow.”

Great for DeFi and broader crypto?

It’s worth noting that Selig first signaled the move in late January, calling for ‘fit-for-purpose’ regulation of new technologies disrupting financial markets.

Interestingly, the update also comes at a crucial time for prediction markets. The regulator recently withdrew a Biden-era rule that banned event contracts tied to sports and political activities.

Selig said the move was the agency’s ‘commitment to lawful innovation,’ underscoring the pro-crypto and pro-innovation pivot under the Trump Administration.

Reacting to the latest IAC update, Uniswap’s Hayden Adams said,

“Last admin’s CFTC only wanted to talk via subpoenas and enforcement. And lots of builders on this IAC! A great sign for the future of the agency.”

Similarly, Chainlink Labs’ Nazarov echoed Adams’ enthusiasm and expected the move to be bullish for tokenization, DeFi, and crypto overall.

Final Thoughts

CFTC chair forms an advisory team to help prepare the agency to form adaptive regulations.
Crypto leaders viewed the move as positive for the industry and a U-turn from the previous administration’s enforcement actions.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the name of the new advisory committee formed by the CFTC, and what is its purpose?

AThe new advisory committee is called the Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC). Its purpose is to help the CFTC drive American innovation, ensure its decisions reflect market realities, and develop adaptive regulations for new technologies like blockchain and AI.

QName at least three crypto industry leaders who are members of the newly formed CFTC committee.

AThree crypto industry leaders on the committee are Brian Armstrong (Coinbase), Hayden Adams (Uniswap), and Brad Garlinghouse (Ripple).

QAccording to CFTC Chair Mike Selig, what two key technologies is the committee tasked with helping to formulate regulations for?

AThe committee is tasked with helping to formulate regulations for blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI).

QWhat recent action did the CFTC take regarding prediction markets, and how did the chairman describe this move?

AThe CFTC withdrew a Biden-era rule that banned event contracts tied to sports and political activities. Chairman Selig described this move as a demonstration of the agency's 'commitment to lawful innovation'.

QHow did Uniswap CEO Hayden Adams characterize the difference between the current CFTC's approach and that of the previous administration?

AHayden Adams said that the previous administration's CFTC 'only wanted to talk via subpoenas and enforcement,' contrasting it with the new committee which includes many builders, calling it a 'great sign for the future of the agency.'

Lecturas Relacionadas

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHace 10 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHace 26 min(s)

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns that the current artificial intelligence investment boom shows classic signs of a bubble, which he expects will eventually burst. In a Bloomberg Television interview, he noted that great technological revolutions often lead to capital inflows that create bubbles, making it difficult for investors and companies to calibrate their spending accurately—either overspending to capture market share or underspending and losing their competitive position. This caution comes amid significant rallies in AI-related assets, particularly chipmakers, driven by soaring demand for data centers and high-bandwidth chips, raising debates about overheating valuations. In contrast, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently asserted that investors embracing the AI wave would see "crazy" returns and dismissed concerns over return on investment for data center spending as outdated. Dalio, however, focuses on the risks in the profit realization phase. He argues that bubbles tend to show signs of破裂 when markets transition from investment to the need for tangible returns, describing the burst as a process of converting paper wealth into cash. While acknowledging AI's intrinsic value, he expressed concern over the future profitability of some AI companies, suggesting the market is repeating a familiar pattern. The 76-year-old billionaire, who fully exited Bridgewater in 2025, has a net worth estimated at $21.5 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros