Crypto card payments overtake P2P stablecoin transfers: Artemis report

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-15Actualizado a 2026-01-15

Resumen

According to a blockchain analytics report by Artemis, crypto card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer (P2P) stablecoin transfers as the primary driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. The data shows that crypto card payments now operate at a monthly run rate exceeding $15 billion, compared to approximately $11 billion for P2P transfers. This shift indicates that stablecoins are increasingly being used through traditional card networks rather than through direct on-chain transactions. Visa dominates this segment, accounting for over 80% of the tracked volume, while Mastercard holds a smaller but growing share. The growth is attributed to expanding merchant acceptance and integration with existing payment infrastructure, allowing users to spend stablecoins without requiring merchants to directly accept crypto. Although P2P transfers remain important for remittances and cross-border settlements, their growth has been slower. The report highlights a structural evolution in stablecoin usage—from infrastructure-led to interface-led adoption—where cards act as the primary user-facing access point, embedding crypto liquidity into global commerce and driving mainstream adoption.

Crypto-linked card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer [P2P] stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. This is according to a new report published on 15 January by blockchain analytics firm Artemis.

The report, titled Stablecoin Payments at Scale: How Cards Bridge Digital Assets and Global Commerce, shows that stablecoin volumes routed through crypto cards now exceed direct wallet-to-wallet payments. It marks a structural shift in how stablecoins are being used in practice.

Artemis data indicates that crypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

While P2P usage continues to grow steadily, card-based payments have accelerated faster. The growth is driven by expanding merchant acceptance and tighter integration with existing payment rails.

Cards emerge as stablecoins’ primary payment interface

Rather than replacing traditional payments outright, stablecoins are increasingly being used behind the scenes through familiar card networks.

The report highlights that most stablecoin-backed card transactions ultimately settle through major card processors.

This allows users to spend dollar-pegged tokens without requiring merchants to accept crypto directly.

Visa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report. Mastercard represents a smaller but growing share, while regional card programs contribute marginally.

This model has allowed stablecoins to scale in consumer payments without requiring new merchant infrastructure. It effectively embeds crypto liquidity into existing global commerce systems.

P2P payments remain relevant but grow more slowly

Artemis notes that P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

However, growth in this segment has been more incremental compared with the rapid expansion seen in card-linked spending.

The divergence suggests that while stablecoins are widely used for moving value between wallets, everyday consumer usage is increasingly mediated through cards rather than direct on-chain payments.

Stablecoin usage shifts from rails to interfaces

The report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption.

Stablecoins remain the settlement layer. However, cards have become the dominant user-facing access point, lowering friction for mainstream users and businesses.

According to Artemis, this dynamic helps explain why stablecoin transaction volumes continue to rise even as direct on-chain payment activity grows at a slower pace.

The findings underline how stablecoins are integrating into traditional financial systems. They do this not by replacing them outrightly, but by quietly powering familiar payment experiences at scale.


Final Thoughts

  • The Artemis report shows a clear shift in how stablecoins are being used, with card-based payments now playing a central role in everyday transactions.
  • As traditional payment rails increasingly bridge digital assets and commerce, stablecoin adoption appears to be moving closer to mainstream consumer behavior rather than remaining a niche crypto-native activity.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the Artemis report, which method has become the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity?

ACrypto-linked card payments have surpassed P2P stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity.

QWhat is the monthly run rate of crypto card payments compared to P2P stablecoin transfers as reported by Artemis?

ACrypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

QWhich card network dominates the stablecoin card payment segment and what is its market share?

AVisa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report.

QWhat key role do P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play, according to the report?

AP2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

QHow does the report frame the evolution of stablecoin adoption in terms of infrastructure and interfaces?

AThe report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption, where stablecoins remain the settlement layer but cards have become the dominant user-facing access point.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Hace 40 min(s)

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Hace 40 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手Hace 45 min(s)

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手Hace 45 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片