Crypto Bill Faces a New Challenge, Delaying its Implementation

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-05Actualizado a 2026-03-05

Resumen

The crypto bill, known as the Clarity Act, faces new challenges that could delay its implementation until at least July 2026. Banks and crypto firms remain opposed, with banks warning of potential deposit flight and risks to financial stability, while crypto companies support the bill for regulatory clarity and the ability to offer yield-bearing products. Despite criticism from former President Trump toward banks, the American Bankers Association has offered suggestions for the bill's advancement. In the Senate, Democrats are seeking additional conditions, including a ban on officials profiting from crypto and stricter anti-money laundering rules. The ongoing conflict in Iran and the approaching 2026 mid-term elections further complicate progress, though some remain optimistic about a potential agreement.

The crypto bill now has a new challenge, not overcoming the same, which could delay its implementation for a longer time. Banks and crypto firms are still on opposite sides despite the intervention of the White House. A maximum stretch has been drawn for July 2026 because months after that could see more focus on the mid-term election.

Challenge for the Crypto Bill

The Clarity Act essentially aims to state regulations for crypto firms more effectively; however, banks have penned a line to obstruct its implementation. Banks have flagged a possibility of deposit flight. This could affect their lending capacity, which is then expected to impact the macro economic condition of the nation.

US President Donald Trump has criticized banks by saying that they were trying to undermine the bill. Trump, in a social media post, called it a powerful crypto agenda and said that they would not allow banks to undermine it.

The American Bankers Association has sought a precautionary move to prevent deterrence to economic growth and financial stability. It has, reportedly, offered constructive suggestions for the advancement of the bill.

Support from Crypto Giants

Needless to say, crypto giants are in support of the crypto bill for two reasons. They have operated in gray areas for a long time, and they are still on the lookout to reward/recruit users in their ecosystem. The Clarity Bill underlines regulations that could help promote adoption of cryptocurrencies.

Another reason is that it enables crypto firms to extend yield-bearing products to users. Companies have reportedly spent approximately $119 million to support pro-crypto candidates in 2024, and are hoping to get a favorable result by July 2026.

Challenges in the Senate

Democrats have sought additional conditions before giving a green light. The crypto bill has to be supported by a minimum of seven democrats. The group has asked for a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules.

The ongoing conflict in Iran is also making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill, according to a statement by Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel.

Many anticipate that no discussion or no progress by July 2026 could delay the bill for a long time, as discussions would then shift to the mid-term election, which is scheduled to happen in November 2026.

Nevertheless, Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger has signalled that the path to a workable agreement is clearer than it was before.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

From Bear Trap to Breakout? Ethereum (ETH) Tests a Crucial Momentum Shift After a 7% Jump

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason for the potential delay in the implementation of the crypto bill?

AThe main reason for the potential delay is a new challenge that the bill is facing, with banks and crypto firms remaining on opposite sides despite White House intervention. Furthermore, the focus is expected to shift to the mid-term elections after July 2026, which could postpone the bill for a longer time.

QWhy are banks opposing the Clarity Act for crypto regulations?

ABanks are opposing the Clarity Act because they have flagged the possibility of deposit flight, which could affect their lending capacity and subsequently impact the nation's macroeconomic condition.

QHow have crypto giants shown their support for the crypto bill?

ACrypto giants support the bill because it provides regulatory clarity after they have operated in gray areas for a long time, and it enables them to extend yield-bearing products to users. They have also spent approximately $119 million in 2024 to support pro-crypto candidates.

QWhat additional conditions have Democrats requested before supporting the crypto bill?

ADemocrats have requested a ban on officials profiting from crypto ventures and to tighten anti-money laundering rules before giving their support to the bill.

QAccording to the article, what external event is making it difficult to discuss the crypto bill?

AAccording to Brian Gardner, the Chief Washington Strategist at Stifel, the ongoing conflict in Iran is making it difficult to have a discussion on the bill.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Ethereum Foundation adds SEAL 911 co-founder to board as privacy focus grows

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has appointed crypto security expert Pascal "pcaversaccio" Caversaccio, co-founder of SEAL 911, to its board of directors. This voluntary one-year appointment aligns with the EF's heightened organizational focus on privacy and security, which it recently deemed "non-negotiable protocol guarantees." Caversaccio is a long-time contributor, a member of the EF's Silviculture Society advisory group, and the author of key documents on Ethereum's cypherpunk ethos and privacy roadmap. The board, which also includes Aya Miyaguchi, Vitalik Buterin, and Patrick Storchenegger, sets the EF's vision and acts as a "security council" to protect its mission. The move underscores the Foundation's commitment to advancing layer-1 privacy, post-quantum security, and Ethereum's self-sovereignty.

cointelegraphHace 15 min(s)

Ethereum Foundation adds SEAL 911 co-founder to board as privacy focus grows

cointelegraphHace 15 min(s)

Fed Drops 'Hawkish Bomb' Late at Night: Interest Rates on Hold, Internal Divisions Unseen in a Decade

The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady at 3.50%-3.75% on July 29, marking the fifth consecutive pause since late 2026. While the decision was widely expected, it revealed a significant internal rift. Three FOMC voting members—Hammack, Kashkari, and Logan—dissented, advocating for a 25-basis-point hike. This level of opposition, the first of its kind since 2016, signals persistent hawkish pressure. Chairman Wash, in a post-meeting press conference, delivered a firm message, emphasizing an unwavering commitment to the 2% inflation target and stating the Fed "would not hesitate to act." He announced a substantial shift away from forward guidance, urging markets to interpret economic data independently. Wash also highlighted AI-related capital spending as a key variable, noting its potential dual impact on boosting productivity while potentially pushing up certain prices. Market reaction was pronounced. Stocks fell sharply, with the Dow dropping over 2% for its worst day in 15 months. Long-term Treasury yields surged, with the 30-year yield hitting its highest since 2007, while the dollar weakened and gold briefly rose above $4,100. The combination of internal policy dissent and a shift toward data-dependent communication introduced significant uncertainty into the market outlook.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Fed Drops 'Hawkish Bomb' Late at Night: Interest Rates on Hold, Internal Divisions Unseen in a Decade

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

The article examines the significance of recent data showing China's total R&D expenditure, measured by purchasing power parity (PPP), catching up to or slightly surpassing that of the United States in 2024. It argues that while this milestone reflects China's immense capacity to mobilize research resources, the competition in semiconductors now extends far beyond sheer financial input. The analysis highlights key differences: China's R&D is heavily skewed towards experimental development (over 80%), focusing on product engineering and industrialization, whereas the U.S. allocates a proportionally larger share (about 15%) to basic research. Furthermore, leading U.S. semiconductor firms reinvest a significant portion of their substantial global sales revenue into R&D, creating a sustainable commercial innovation cycle that is difficult to replicate. The article emphasizes that semiconductor progress depends on converting R&D into commercially viable products that pass rigorous customer validation and achieve repeat orders, not just on spending levels. It concludes that as China enters the top tier of R&D spenders, the critical challenges shift to improving resource allocation efficiency, fostering long-term basic research, and building effective mechanisms to bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and reliable, market-ready industrial capabilities.

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

marsbitHace 59 min(s)

Walsh: 2% Inflation Target Unwavering, Maintain Independence, Focus on AI Transformation (Full Text Attached)

Fed Chair Warsh emphasized an unwavering commitment to the 2% inflation target, stating there is "no soft target" and that the FOMC is united on this goal. He indicated that if high inflation persists, interest rate hikes would likely be part of the solution. The Fed voted 9-3 to maintain the benchmark rate at 3.5%-3.75%. Warsh announced a significant shift in policy communication, moving away from forward guidance. He noted that market rates have risen between meetings, reflecting a tightening of financial conditions as participants now react more to direct economic data rather than Fed signals. On AI, Warsh highlighted a nearly 20% annual growth rate in high-tech capital expenditures related to artificial intelligence. He acknowledged its potential to boost productivity and supply but also its role in driving up prices for certain sectors like chips and AI infrastructure. The Fed is assessing whether these price pressures will remain sector-specific or spread more broadly. Warsh stressed the Fed's independence, asserting it will not deviate from its mandate due to external pressures. He framed the current decision not as a "pause" but as a period of rigorous review of economic conditions, with future actions to be data-dependent.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Walsh: 2% Inflation Target Unwavering, Maintain Independence, Focus on AI Transformation (Full Text Attached)

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Top 10% of American Households Capture 88% of Wealth, How Is the AI Era Cake Divided?

AI Worsens Wealth Inequality as Top 10% of US Families Garner 88% of Stock Gains (2019-2026) A report from the China Finance 40 Forum highlights that the AI boom is significantly widening wealth inequality in the United States. From 2019 to Q1 2026, wealth from directly held stocks by US households nearly doubled from $29 trillion to approximately $55 trillion, with rapid growth concentrated post-2023, coinciding with the AI-driven stock market surge. The distribution of these gains has been starkly uneven. Between 2022 and Q1 2026, the wealth increase of about $21 trillion was captured almost entirely by the wealthiest families: the top 10% secured roughly 88% ($18.5 trillion), while the bottom 50% received only about 1% ($0.2 trillion). This has contributed to a growing disparity in disposable income shares. The report, referencing economic historian Robert Allen, draws parallels to historical technological shifts like the "Engels' Pause" during the First Industrial Revolution, where worker wages stagnated despite productivity gains. It suggests AI could induce a similar period where capital收益 outpace labor income, exacerbating inequality. Huang Yiping of Peking University identifies four mechanisms through which AI impacts income distribution: capital-bias (reducing labor's income share), task polarization (hollowing out middle-skill jobs), skill-based digital divides, and wealth amplification through assets. He warns that if this trend continues, strong supply growth driven by AI could be undermined by persistently weak consumer demand, threatening sustainable economic growth. To address these challenges, the report proposes a three-pronged strategy: 1) Defensive measures like strengthening social safety nets and antitrust enforcement; 2) Empowering workers through education reform and lifelong learning to collaborate with AI; and 3) Rebalancing via policies such as potential taxes on AI超额收益 and mechanisms for broader sharing of technology's benefits, ensuring AI's红利 are more equitably distributed.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Top 10% of American Households Capture 88% of Wealth, How Is the AI Era Cake Divided?

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot