Crypto Analyst Points to the Bloody Monday Factor After Crypto Market Slips

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-19Actualizado a 2026-01-19

Resumen

A crypto analyst has attributed the recent market downturn to "Bloody Monday," noting that nearly $100 billion was wiped out in 12 hours. The global crypto market cap fell 2.82% to around $3.13 trillion, with BTC and ETH declining 2.33% and 3.01%, respectively. Key factors include US tariff threats against several European nations and a shift in investor sentiment toward gold and silver amid trade tensions. Other global markets, including European and Japanese indices, also saw declines.

The crypto market is down, and a crypto analyst has pinned this to a factor called “Bloody Monday.” He further underlined the extent to which the market has lost its value in just 12 hours. Many more factors are possibly influencing the downswing across the globe.

Crypto Analyst on Bloody Monday

Ted Pillows, a notable crypto market analyst, has referred to today’s decline as “Bloody Monday.” He said that the factor was back, hinting that it could be affecting the movement of the price. Ted further added that almost $100 billion has been wiped out in the last 12 hours.

Crypto enthusiasts have reacted to his post with some saying that the decline was expected and they were loaded on shorts. Another crypto enthusiast said that it was just liquidation, which was a normal market cleanup.

Decline in Crypto Market

The decline of the crypto market is more than evident, with several tokens losing momentum in just 24 hours. The market cap has shed almost 2.82% of its value and is now hovering around $3.13 trillion. The CMC20 Index has slipped to $195.57, down by 2.80%. The FGI, earlier moving above 50 points, has plunged to 45 points when the article is being written.

As for the price of top tokens, BTC and ETH are down by 2.33% and 3.01% over the last 24 hours, respectively. They are now exchanging hands at $92,793.11 and $3,206.69, applicable in the same order. Interestingly, the crypto market has retraced its steps at a time when investors are allocating funds to Gold and Silver amid rising international trade tensions.

Factors Behind this Bloody Monday

Several factors have influenced the price on Monday. The most talked about factor is the recent tariff threat by US President Donald Trump. He has vowed to impose tariffs on eight European countries till he is allowed to buy Greenland, which Trump says is for national security. An initial imposition could be of 10% effective February 01, likely to be hiked to 25% effective June 01, 2026, if both don’t reach a deal.

Eight countries facing the possible tariff rate are Norway, Denmark, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Britain, and Finland. Not just crypto but most of the global markets recorded a decline. DAX Futures and EUROSTOXX 50 Futures plunged by around 1.1% while Japan’s Nikkei lost 1%.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Solana (SOL) Tumbles 6%: Can Bulls Halt the Freefall, or Do Bears Truly Hold the Reins?

TagsCrypto AnalystCrypto Market

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the 'Bloody Monday' factor mentioned by the crypto analyst?

AThe 'Bloody Monday' factor refers to the significant market decline that occurred on Monday, where nearly $100 billion was wiped out from the crypto market in just 12 hours, as highlighted by analyst Ted Pillows.

QHow much has the total crypto market cap decreased according to the article?

AThe crypto market cap has decreased by almost 2.82%, now hovering around $3.13 trillion.

QWhat are the current prices of BTC and ETH after the decline?

ABTC is currently priced at $92,793.11 (down 2.33%) and ETH is at $3,206.69 (down 3.01%) over the last 24 hours.

QWhat major event is cited as a key factor influencing the market decline?

AThe recent tariff threat by US President Donald Trump against eight European countries, with proposed tariffs starting at 10% effective February 01 and potentially rising to 25% by June 01, 2026, if no deal is reached.

QWhich countries are facing potential tariffs according to the article?

AThe eight countries facing potential tariffs are Norway, Denmark, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Britain, and Finland.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 4 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片