Crypto Analyst Points to the Bloody Monday Factor After Crypto Market Slips

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-01-19Actualizado a 2026-01-19

Resumen

A crypto analyst has attributed the recent market downturn to "Bloody Monday," noting that nearly $100 billion was wiped out in 12 hours. The global crypto market cap fell 2.82% to around $3.13 trillion, with BTC and ETH declining 2.33% and 3.01%, respectively. Key factors include US tariff threats against several European nations and a shift in investor sentiment toward gold and silver amid trade tensions. Other global markets, including European and Japanese indices, also saw declines.

The crypto market is down, and a crypto analyst has pinned this to a factor called “Bloody Monday.” He further underlined the extent to which the market has lost its value in just 12 hours. Many more factors are possibly influencing the downswing across the globe.

Crypto Analyst on Bloody Monday

Ted Pillows, a notable crypto market analyst, has referred to today’s decline as “Bloody Monday.” He said that the factor was back, hinting that it could be affecting the movement of the price. Ted further added that almost $100 billion has been wiped out in the last 12 hours.

Crypto enthusiasts have reacted to his post with some saying that the decline was expected and they were loaded on shorts. Another crypto enthusiast said that it was just liquidation, which was a normal market cleanup.

Decline in Crypto Market

The decline of the crypto market is more than evident, with several tokens losing momentum in just 24 hours. The market cap has shed almost 2.82% of its value and is now hovering around $3.13 trillion. The CMC20 Index has slipped to $195.57, down by 2.80%. The FGI, earlier moving above 50 points, has plunged to 45 points when the article is being written.

As for the price of top tokens, BTC and ETH are down by 2.33% and 3.01% over the last 24 hours, respectively. They are now exchanging hands at $92,793.11 and $3,206.69, applicable in the same order. Interestingly, the crypto market has retraced its steps at a time when investors are allocating funds to Gold and Silver amid rising international trade tensions.

Factors Behind this Bloody Monday

Several factors have influenced the price on Monday. The most talked about factor is the recent tariff threat by US President Donald Trump. He has vowed to impose tariffs on eight European countries till he is allowed to buy Greenland, which Trump says is for national security. An initial imposition could be of 10% effective February 01, likely to be hiked to 25% effective June 01, 2026, if both don’t reach a deal.

Eight countries facing the possible tariff rate are Norway, Denmark, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Britain, and Finland. Not just crypto but most of the global markets recorded a decline. DAX Futures and EUROSTOXX 50 Futures plunged by around 1.1% while Japan’s Nikkei lost 1%.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Solana (SOL) Tumbles 6%: Can Bulls Halt the Freefall, or Do Bears Truly Hold the Reins?

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the 'Bloody Monday' factor mentioned by the crypto analyst?

AThe 'Bloody Monday' factor refers to the significant market decline that occurred on Monday, where nearly $100 billion was wiped out from the crypto market in just 12 hours, as highlighted by analyst Ted Pillows.

QHow much has the total crypto market cap decreased according to the article?

AThe crypto market cap has decreased by almost 2.82%, now hovering around $3.13 trillion.

QWhat are the current prices of BTC and ETH after the decline?

ABTC is currently priced at $92,793.11 (down 2.33%) and ETH is at $3,206.69 (down 3.01%) over the last 24 hours.

QWhat major event is cited as a key factor influencing the market decline?

AThe recent tariff threat by US President Donald Trump against eight European countries, with proposed tariffs starting at 10% effective February 01 and potentially rising to 25% by June 01, 2026, if no deal is reached.

QWhich countries are facing potential tariffs according to the article?

AThe eight countries facing potential tariffs are Norway, Denmark, France, Sweden, the Netherlands, Germany, Britain, and Finland.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight NewsHace 34 min(s)

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight NewsHace 34 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 42 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Trading

Spot