Congress Targets Crypto Prediction Markets With 4 Bills Banning War And Assassination Bets

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-19Actualizado a 2026-03-19

Resumen

US Congress is intensifying regulatory pressure on crypto prediction markets with the introduction of the BETS OFF Act, the fourth such legislative effort since January. Sponsored by Senator Chris Murphy and Rep. Greg Casar, the bill aims to ban betting on sensitive events including terrorism, assassinations, wars, and any occurrences where the outcome is known or can be influenced. The legislation extends US jurisdiction to offshore platforms, mandates payment processors to block related transactions, and imposes criminal penalties on US-based promoters. This action follows suspicious trading activity, notably on Polymarket, where large, anonymous bets were placed and won substantial sums just hours before US military actions against Iran and Venezuela. Lawmakers express concern that such markets create dangerous conflicts of interest, allowing individuals with insider knowledge to profit from and potentially influence government decisions. The bill joins three others introduced since January, all seeking to prohibit betting on government actions, terrorism, and assassinations, reflecting broad bipartisan and public support for such restrictions.

Crypto prediction platform Polymarket and derivatives exchange Kalshi were closing in on $20 billion valuations when the US Congress decided it had seen enough.

A Bill Targeting Crypto And A Very Long Acronym

Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Rep. Greg Casar of Texas introduced the BETS OFF Act this week — short for Banning Event Trading on Sensitive Operations and Federal Functions.

The legislation would make it illegal to place, accept, or facilitate bets on terrorism, assassinations, wars, or any event where someone already knows the outcome or has the power to determine it.

The bill doesn’t stop at US borders. Because many of these contracts trade on offshore crypto platforms, the legislation would extend federal gambling laws to reach international operators.

Payment processors would be required to cut off money flows to prohibited platforms. US-based individuals who run or promote these businesses could face criminal penalties.

Any registered commodity exchange listing these types of contracts would also be barred from doing so.

The law would take effect 30 days after being signed.

Suspicious Trades That Caught Washington’s Attention

The bill’s arrival follows a pair of incidents that drew intense scrutiny on Capitol Hill. Hours before US military strikes on Iran — and before American forces extracted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro — anonymous accounts on Polymarket placed large bets on those exact outcomes. They walked away with hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Murphy argued this creates a dangerous setup: when people connected to government decisions can profit anonymously from bets placed before those decisions go public, the line between governing and gambling disappears.

The concern isn’t just corruption. It’s that decision-makers could develop a financial interest in pushing policy toward specific outcomes.

Total crypto market cap currently at $2.44 trillion. Chart: TradingView

Polling backs up public concern. According to data from Data for Progress, 61% of independents and 57% of Republicans support banning wagers on government actions. Opposition to betting markets tied to terrorism or assassinations is even higher — 80% of voters said no.

Four Bills In Under Three Months

The BETS OFF Act is part of a rapid pile-on from lawmakers. It’s the fourth major piece of legislation targeting crypto prediction markets since January.

In January, Rep. Ritchie Torres of New York introduced a bill barring federal officials from betting on markets tied to government decisions — a direct response to a trader who turned $30,000 into more than $400,000 betting on Maduro’s capture before it happened.

On March 5, a bipartisan pair — Blake Moore of Utah and Salud Carbajal of California — filed a bill requiring the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to ban contracts on terrorism, war, elections, and government activity, with a carve-out letting individual states allow sports betting.

Five days later, Senator Adam Schiff and Rep. Mike Levin introduced the DEATH BETS Act, targeting contracts tied to war, assassination, and individual deaths.

That bill came after $529 million in Iran-related trades hit Polymarket in a single stretch.

Featured image from Thomas Fuller/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images, chart from TradingView

Criptos en tendencia

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the full name of the BETS OFF Act and who introduced it?

AThe BETS OFF Act stands for Banning Event Trading on Sensitive Operations and Federal Functions. It was introduced by Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut and Rep. Greg Casar of Texas.

QWhat specific types of bets would the BETS OFF Act make illegal?

AThe BETS OFF Act would make it illegal to place, accept, or facilitate bets on terrorism, assassinations, wars, or any event where someone already knows the outcome or has the power to determine it.

QWhat two specific incidents involving Polymarket are cited as reasons for the proposed legislation?

AThe two incidents were large, anonymous bets placed on Polymarket hours before US military strikes on Iran and before American forces extracted Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. The bettors won hundreds of thousands of dollars.

QAccording to the article, what is a major concern of lawmakers regarding these prediction markets beyond corruption?

AA major concern is that decision-makers could develop a financial interest in pushing government policy toward specific outcomes to profit from their bets.

QHow many major bills targeting crypto prediction markets have been introduced since January, and what is one example?

AFour major bills have been introduced since January. One example is the DEATH BETS Act, introduced by Senator Adam Schiff and Rep. Mike Levin, which targets contracts tied to war, assassination, and individual deaths.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHace 51 min(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar 4

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar 4 (4) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar 4 (4) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu 4 (4)Después de comprar tu 4 (4), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear 4 (4)Tradear fácilmente con 4 (4) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

797 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.10.20Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar 4

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de 4 (4).

活动图片