Coins of the Year. How Cryptocurrency Traders Made Money on Gold

RBK-cryptoPublicado a 2025-12-17Actualizado a 2025-12-17

Resumen

In 2025, while Bitcoin and most cryptocurrencies experienced significant volatility, gold consistently reached new all-time highs. Crypto investors gained exposure to this rally through gold-backed stablecoins, a niche asset class that became one of the year's top performers with returns of approximately 65%. The leading tokens, Paxos' PAXG and Tether's XAUT, saw their combined market capitalization surge past $4 billion, dominating the sector. Gold itself hit a record high above $4,380 per ounce in October. In contrast, Bitcoin, which also peaked in October, fell over 30% from its high and was down 8% year-to-date. The article highlights that gold confirmed its role as a safe-haven asset during a year of geopolitical tension, notably after Donald Trump administration's policies began, while Bitcoin's hedging properties were questioned. Gold's performance (+26%) significantly outpaced Bitcoin and major US stock indices like the NASDAQ (+17%) and S&P 500 (+12%).

"RBC-Crypto" does not provide investment advice, the material is published for informational purposes only. Cryptocurrency is a volatile asset that can lead to financial losses.

While Bitcoin and most other cryptoassets experienced significant price volatility throughout 2025, gold confidently set new highs. For investors who did not want to leave the digital market, there was a way to participate in this rally through gold-backed stablecoins. This niche asset category became one of the main beneficiaries of the year, demonstrating one of the best returns in the market.

Gold-backed stablecoins showed one of the highest returns on the crypto market since the beginning of 2025, with growth of about 65%. Among the top hundred cryptocurrencies by capitalization, according to Coinmarketcap data as of December 17, "gold tokens" outperformed most major cryptoassets in terms of percentage growth.

The largest representatives of "gold tokens" are PAXG from Paxos and XAUT from Tether. According to The Block data as of December 17, their combined capitalization accounts for about 87% of the entire market, with figures of $1.5 billion and $2.25 billion.

In early December 2025, the capitalization of the gold-based token sector exceeded $4 billion for the first time in history, representing a growth of more than three times compared to the beginning of the year. The main share of the increase came from PAXG and XAUT—their values at the beginning of the year were $525 million and $645 million.

Leader of the Crypto Market

Over the 11 months of 2025, gold quotes rose for eight months in a range from 2% to 11%. In May, June, and July, price changes did not exceed 1%. A historical maximum was reached in October at a level above $4.38 thousand per ounce. According to Tradingview data as of December 17, the price has decreased by less than 2% from the record level.

For comparison: Bitcoin, like gold, reached a maximum in October at $126.2 thousand, but by the current moment its quotes have fallen from the peak by more than 30%. And since the beginning of the year, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) have lost 8% and 12% respectively, trading around $87 thousand and $2.9 thousand. The capitalization of the crypto market as a whole fell by about 9%, to $2.97 trillion, over the same period.

Coins that outperformed gold in terms of yield since the beginning of the year belong to the privacy sector—Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR) with growth of 600% and 125% respectively. And the coins with the closest yields following the "gold tokens" include the token affiliated with the largest crypto exchange Binance—BNB (BNB) and the most popular hard fork (modified version of the codebase) of Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash (BCH). Their growth rates since the beginning of the year were about 25%.

Gold vs. Bitcoin

During geopolitical and other crises, investors tend to buy assets that can protect their capital from risks. Traditionally, one such asset is considered to be gold. This is what happened in 2025 after Donald Trump took office as US President in early January, when he began applying trade tariff policies to various countries.

Initially, many experts assumed that against the backdrop of macroeconomic shocks, Bitcoin would move together with gold. Especially actively, the thesis was promoted during periods of active growth of the main cryptocurrency. For example, against the backdrop of explosive growth at the end of 2024, the largest capital manager—BlackRock—repeatedly noted the hedging properties of Bitcoin during geopolitical tensions and concerns about the state of the US national debt and budget deficit.

However, in 2025, the thesis that Bitcoin plays the role of a hedging asset was called into question, and gold confirmed itself as a protective asset. Experts began to point this out against the backdrop of diverging dynamics in the middle of the year.

"It is unfair to think that institutional investors invest capital in Bitcoin for the same reason as in gold. These two assets do not play the same role in investment portfolios," said eToro analyst Josh Gilbert in August.

The yield of gold since the beginning of 2025 is 26% ahead of Bitcoin and many other asset classes, such as the leading US stock indices—NASDAQ and S&P 500. Their quotes have increased by 17% and 12% respectively since the beginning of the year. In 2025, gold correlates more with indices than with the main cryptocurrency.

Coins of the Year. How and Why the Trump Family Cryptocurrencies Crashed

"2026 will be a 'bull' year. Bitwise forecasts for the cryptocurrency market

Coins of the Year. How and Why the Solana Cryptocurrency Soared and Fell

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the performance of gold-backed stablecoins in 2025 compared to major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum?

AGold-backed stablecoins demonstrated one of the highest returns on the crypto market in 2025, with a gain of about 65%. In contrast, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH) lost 8% and 12% of their value respectively since the start of the year.

QWhich are the two largest gold-backed stablecoins by market capitalization and what were their values as of December 17?

AThe two largest gold-backed stablecoins are PAXG by Paxos and XAUT by Tether. As of December 17, their market capitalizations were $1.5 billion and $2.25 billion, respectively, together accounting for about 87% of the entire market.

QWhat significant milestone did the gold-backed token sector achieve in December 2025?

AIn early December 2025, the market capitalization of the gold-backed token sector exceeded $4 billion for the first time in history, representing a growth of more than three times since the beginning of the year.

QAccording to the article, how did Bitcoin's performance as a hedging asset compare to gold's in 2025?

AIn 2025, the thesis that Bitcoin acts as a hedging asset was called into question, while gold confirmed its status as a safe-haven asset. Gold's performance since the start of the year outpaced Bitcoin's by 26%.

QWhich two privacy-focused cryptocurrencies outperformed gold in terms of returns in 2025?

AThe two privacy-focused cryptocurrencies that outperformed gold in returns were Zcash (ZEC) and Monero (XMR), with gains of 600% and 125% respectively since the start of the year.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

Tech giants like Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft are undergoing a radical financial transformation due to AI. Their traditional "light-asset, high-free-cash-flow" model is being dismantled by staggering capital expenditures on AI infrastructure—data centers, GPUs, and power. Combined 2026 guidance exceeds $700 billion, a 4.5x increase from 2022, causing free cash flow to plummet (e.g., Amazon's fell 95%). To fund this, they are borrowing unprecedented sums through long-dated, multi-currency bonds (e.g., Alphabet's 100-year bond). The world's most conservative capital—pensions, insurers—is now funding Silicon Valley's most speculative bet. This shift makes these companies resemble heavy-asset industrials (railroads, utilities) rather than software firms, threatening their premium valuations. Historically, such infrastructure booms (railroads, fiber optics) followed a pattern: genuine technology, overbuilding fueled by competitive frenzy, aggressive debt financing, and a crash triggered by financial conditions—not technology failure. The infrastructure remained, but many original builders and financiers did not survive. The core gamble is a "time arbitrage": using cheap debt today to build scale and lock in customers before AI capabilities commoditize. They are betting that AI revenue will materialize before debt comes due. Their positions vary: Amazon is under immediate cash pressure; Meta's path to monetization is unclear; Alphabet has a robust core business buffer; Microsoft has the shortest path from infrastructure to revenue. The contract is set: the most risk-averse global capital has lent its time to Silicon Valley, awaiting a future that is promised but uncertain.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Borrowing Money from a Hundred Years Later, Building Incomprehensible AI

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

"The article explores the 'VVV' concept as the new AI-focused narrative within the Base ecosystem, centered around the token $VVV of the privacy-focused, uncensored generative AI platform Venice, led by crypto veteran Erik Voorhees. Venice has seen significant growth in 2026, with its API users surging, partly attributed to exposure from OpenClaw. The platform now boasts over 2 million total users and 55,000 paid subscribers. Correspondingly, the $VVV token price has risen over 9x this year. Key to its performance are tokenomics designed for value accrual: reduced annual emissions, subscription revenue used for buyback-and-burn, and a unique staking mechanism. Staking $VVV yields $sVVV, which can be used to mint $DIEM tokens. Each staked $DIEM provides a daily $1 credit for using Venice's API services, creating tangible utility. The article also highlights other tokens associated with the 'VVV' narrative. $POD, the token of distributed AI network Dolphin (which co-developed Venice's default AI model), saw a massive price surge. $cyb3rwr3n, a project for a Venice credit auction market, gained attention due to perceived connections to Venice's team despite official denials. Finally, $SR of robotics platform STRIKEROBOT.AI rose after announcing a partnership with Venice for robot vision-language model development. Overall, the 'VVV' ecosystem combines AI platform growth, deflationary tokenomics, and innovative utility mechanisms, driving significant investor interest and price action in related tokens."

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

The 'VVV' Concept Soars 9x in Half a Year, The New AI Narrative on Base Chain

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Trading

Spot

Futuros