CoinFound × OSL Research Launches Stablecoin Research Collaboration, First Phase Focuses on USDGO

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-09Actualizado a 2026-04-09

Resumen

CoinFound and OSL Research have launched a stablecoin research partnership, with the initial phase centered on USDGO. The collaboration will conduct thematic research on the USDGO stablecoin ecosystem, utilizing on-chain data analysis and market structure observations. The study aims to explore the development path of stablecoins within the digital financial system and their application potential in trading, settlement, and on-chain financial scenarios. As stablecoins increasingly serve as a bridge between traditional finance and on-chain financial infrastructure, there is growing demand for research into their issuance mechanisms, liquidity structures, and ecosystem synergies. CoinFound and OSL Research will collaborate on building research frameworks and sharing industry insights. Their joint efforts will include co-developing research content, establishing data analysis frameworks, and publishing findings through reports, market observations, and thematic analyses. OSL Research, part of the OSL Group, focuses on in-depth digital asset research and provides forward-looking market insights. CoinFound specializes in Web3 data and research, offering analysis of asset structures and capital flow trends through on-chain analytics. Together, they aim to advance stablecoin research and provide clearer industry benchmarks for the digital asset market.

As the first research direction of the collaboration, both parties will conduct a thematic study on the USDGO stablecoin ecosystem. Through on-chain data analysis and market structure observation, they will explore the development path of stablecoins in the digital financial system and their application potential in trading, settlement, and on-chain financial scenarios.

As stablecoins increasingly become a critical bridge connecting the traditional financial system with on-chain financial infrastructure, market demand for research on stablecoin issuance mechanisms, liquidity structures, and ecosystem synergy continues to grow. Against this backdrop, the collaboration between CoinFound and OSL Research will focus on building a joint research framework and delivering industry insights. Both parties will cooperate in co-creating research content and data analysis frameworks, releasing findings to the market through joint research reports, industry observations, and thematic analyses.

OSL Research, a subsidiary of the OSL Group, specializes in in-depth research on the digital asset industry, providing forward-looking market insights.

CoinFound focuses on Web3 data and research, offering insights into asset structures and capital flows through on-chain analysis and industry research.

Both parties aim to promote the continuous deepening of stablecoin-related research through this collaboration and provide clearer industry references for the digital asset market.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the primary focus of the initial research collaboration between CoinFound and OSL Research?

AThe initial research will focus on the USDGO stablecoin ecosystem, examining its development path in the digital financial system and its application potential in trading, settlement, and on-chain financial scenarios.

QWhy is there an increasing market demand for research on stablecoins according to the article?

ABecause stablecoins are increasingly becoming a critical bridge connecting the traditional financial system with on-chain financial infrastructure, raising the need for studies on their issuance mechanisms, liquidity structures, and ecological synergy.

QWhat specific areas will the CoinFound and OSL Research collaboration cover in terms of methodology?

AThe collaboration will cover joint building of research frameworks and data analysis frameworks, utilizing on-chain data analysis and market structure observation.

QWhat are the respective research specialties of OSL Research and CoinFound as described in the article?

AOSL Research focuses on in-depth research of the digital asset industry and provides forward-looking market insights. CoinFound specializes in Web3 data and research, offering insights into asset structures and fund flows through on-chain analysis and industry research.

QWhat is the ultimate goal of the research partnership between CoinFound and OSL Research?

AThe goal is to promote the continued deepening of stablecoin-related research and provide clearer industry references for the digital asset market.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinistHace 7 min(s)

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinistHace 7 min(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbitHace 12 min(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot