Coinbase CPO Lists 5 Critical Errors US Congress Should Avoid In Stablecoin Regulation

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-03-11Actualizado a 2026-03-11

Resumen

Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad outlines five key mistakes US Congress should avoid in stablecoin regulation. He warns against undermining bipartisan goals of the GENIUS Act, which aims to strengthen the US dollar, boost demand for Treasuries, and keep digital innovation onshore. Shirzad cautions against favoring traditional banks with unverified claims about deposit flight risks, as stablecoins benefit consumers and banks alike. He also emphasizes the need for precise regulatory authority to prevent future misuse and avoid disrupting existing lawful business partnerships. Finally, he urges Congress to consider the voices of millions of crypto investors, not just bank lobbyists, and to enact clear rules that foster innovation in the US rather than driving it abroad.

After the country’s first stablecoin bill (the GENIUS Act) passed last year, the proposed crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, faced significant delays in the US Congress, particularly due to growing opposition from the traditional banking sector.

In this climate, Coinbase’s Chief Policy Officer, Faryar Shirzad, has outlined five critical recommendations on what Congress should avoid when it comes to regulating stablecoins.

Coinbase CPO Urges Congress Not To Favor Banks

First, Shirzad cautioned against undermining the bipartisan goals established in the country’s stablecoin legislation, which was signed into law last year by President Donald Trump.

He stated that the GENIUS Act aims to strengthen the US dollar, increase demand for US Treasuries, and encourage digital asset innovation within the United States, rather than allowing this innovation to migrate to other countries, such as China.

Coinbase’s CPO said that any amendments to the rewards framework should reinforce these goals, not diminish them.

Shirzad also highlighted the importance of consumer interests, warning against legislative measures that might extract funds from consumers based on unverified claims regarding deposit flight risks.

He noted that stablecoins are designed to make transactions faster and more affordable, with banks themselves being among the foremost adopters.

Revisiting settled laws to favor banks and potentially hamper non-bank platforms would represent poor public policy, especially if rooted in unreliable premises, Shirzad claimed.

Potential Pitfalls For Stablecoins

The Coinbase official also emphasized the need for precise regulatory authority, advising Congress not to introduce vague enforcement powers that could be misused in the future.

Ambiguous regulations could allow succeeding administrations to undermine Congress’s original intent, which could inadvertently lead to the prohibition of lawful activities in the space. Therefore, Shirzad urged lawmakers to establish clear statutory guidelines that provide firm boundaries for any regulations.

Another critical point raised by Shirzad pertains to the need for legislation that does not disrupt existing lawful businesses. He claimed that the stablecoin ecosystem currently involves partnerships among issuers, platforms, and technology providers.

Coinbase’s CPO further claimed that any new legislation should set guidelines for the future rather than retroactively invalidate legitimate commercial agreements or target specific companies.

Finally, Shirzad called for Congress to listen to the voices of voters. While bank executives hold considerable political sway in Washington, he stated that ‘tens of millions of Americans” are invested in cryptocurrencies, and their opinions should carry equal weight. The Coinbase executive concluded:

Stablecoins strengthen the dollar, increase demand for U.S. Treasuries, and modernize payments. They’re also going to be a big commercial opportunity for banks of all sizes. Congress should focus on clear rules that allow innovation to grow in America — not policies that push it offshore.

The daily chart shows Coinbase’s stock, COIN, inching closer to $200 on Tuesday’s trading session. Source: COIN on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the five critical recommendations that Coinbase's CPO outlined for Congress regarding stablecoin regulation?

AThe five recommendations are: 1) Not to undermine the bipartisan goals of the GENIUS Act, 2) Avoid legislative measures that extract funds from consumers based on unverified claims, 3) Not to introduce vague enforcement powers, 4) Ensure legislation does not disrupt existing lawful businesses, and 5) Listen to the voices of voters invested in crypto.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary purpose of the GENIUS Act as stated by Faryar Shirzad?

AThe primary purpose of the GENIUS Act is to strengthen the US dollar, increase demand for US Treasuries, and encourage digital asset innovation within the United States to prevent this innovation from migrating to other countries.

QWhy does Shirzad warn against introducing vague enforcement powers in stablecoin regulation?

AHe warns that ambiguous regulations could allow future administrations to misuse these powers, undermine Congress's original intent, and potentially lead to the prohibition of lawful activities in the crypto space.

QWhat potential negative outcome does Shirzad associate with legislation that favors traditional banks over non-bank platforms?

AHe claims that revisiting settled laws to favor banks would represent poor public policy, as it could hamper non-bank platforms and be based on unreliable premises like unverified claims of deposit flight risks.

QWhat key benefits of stablecoins does the Coinbase executive highlight in his concluding statement?

AHe states that stablecoins strengthen the dollar, increase demand for U.S. Treasuries, modernize payments, and represent a significant commercial opportunity for banks of all sizes.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbitHace 2 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHace 3 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片