Coinbase CEO calls tokenized stocks ‘inevitable’ amid CLARITY Act uncertainty

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-18Actualizado a 2026-01-18

Resumen

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong remains highly optimistic about tokenized stocks, calling them "inevitable" due to their potential to be faster, cheaper, and more global, despite recent regulatory uncertainty surrounding the CLARITY Act. The tokenized stock market has grown rapidly to $867 million, nearing $1 billion, with projections suggesting it could reach trillions by 2030 under clear regulation. A Bitwise survey indicated strong institutional interest, with stablecoins and tokenization being the top focus among financial advisors. However, the industry is divided on proposed crypto legislation, with Coinbase withdrawing support over concerns that the Senate bill bans tokenized stocks, while others like Robinhood downplayed these issues. BNB Chain has recently overtaken Solana as the leading settlement layer for tokenized equities.

In less than a year, the tokenized stock market has risen from zero to nearly $1 billion and could explode if regulatory clarity is established for the sector.

Despite the recent legislative hiccups with the CLARITY Act, the Coinbase CEO has remained bullish on on-chain stocks. On X (formerly Twitter), he said tokenized stocks will be huge and added,

“It’s inevitable – faster, cheaper, more global”

Sizing tokenized markets

Tokenized equities and ETFs are the on-chain version of traditional shares. Most projections for the sector range from a few trillion dollars to tens of trillions by 2030.

For McKinsey, the market could reach $3.8 trillion in an accelerated adoption scenario with clear and permitted regulation.

In other words, the massive potential is undeniable. In fact, a recent survey by asset manager Bitwise found that stablecoins and tokenization had the highest interest among the financial advisors interviewed.

“Stablecoins and tokenization attracted the most interest (30%), followed by “digital gold”/fiat debasement (22%) and crypto-linked AI investments (19%).”

This was a telltale sign of the immense potential and institutional interest in tokenization. Commenting on the survey, Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan said,

“Crypto’s future has always depended on what financial advisors think of it.”

Tokenization rules split industry

However, the future growth hinges on clear rules for issuers. But the industry appears divided over the provisions of the Senate’s crypto market structure bill regarding tokenized securities.

For Coinbase, the Senate draft banned tokenized stocks and stablecoin rewards, forcing the exchange to withdraw its support earlier in the week.

But other leaders, such as Robinhood’s chief legal officer and former SEC commissioner Dan Gallagher, downplayed the concerns as “overblown.”

“Concerns about tokenization in the Senate bill are overblown, but we’ll work with Congress to address any lingering uncertainty.”

It remains to be seen whether a deal will be reached to reignite the bill’s momentum and usher in the tokenization boom.

Meanwhile, the tokenized stock market has reached $867 million and is inching closer to $1 billion. Notably, the sector saw an 11% surge in Monthly Transfer Volume to $2.3 billion while holders increased by 22% to 159,000.

This was indicative of accelerated early adoption and appetite for tokenized stocks.

At the chain settlement level, Solana has been leading traction since last July, but BNB Chain flipped it and has maintained the lead over the past two months.


Final Thoughts

  • Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong was bullish on tokenized stocks despite regulatory uncertainty.
  • BNB Chain flipped Solana as the top settlement layer for tokenized stocks and ETFs.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the Coinbase CEO's view on tokenized stocks despite the uncertainty surrounding the CLARITY Act?

ACoinbase CEO Brian Armstrong remains bullish on tokenized stocks, calling them 'inevitable' and describing them as 'faster, cheaper, more global'.

QWhat is the projected market size for tokenized equities and ETFs by 2030 according to McKinsey?

AMcKinsey projects that the tokenized market could reach $3.8 trillion in an accelerated adoption scenario with clear and permitted regulation.

QAccording to a Bitwise survey, which crypto-related topic attracted the most interest from financial advisors?

AStablecoins and tokenization attracted the most interest at 30%, followed by 'digital gold'/fiat debasement (22%) and crypto-linked AI investments (19%).

QWhy did Coinbase withdraw its support from the Senate's crypto market structure bill?

ACoinbase withdrew its support because the Senate draft was interpreted as banning tokenized stocks and stablecoin rewards.

QWhich blockchain has recently become the top settlement layer for tokenized stocks and ETFs?

ABNB Chain flipped Solana and has maintained the lead as the top settlement layer for tokenized stocks and ETFs over the past two months.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) kept its benchmark interest rate at 1% on July 31, as widely expected, following a June hike to a 31-year high. The decision passed with an 8-1 vote, with board member Hajime Takata again dissenting in favor of a hike to 1.25%. Despite holding rates steady, the BOJ signaled a hawkish tilt, warning that underlying inflation is likely to accelerate and exceed 2% from the latter half of the fiscal year. While it slightly lowered its core inflation forecast for FY2026, officials expressed stronger confidence that an overshoot will occur later, driven by yen weakness, corporate pricing behavior, and lingering energy shock effects. Markets were focused on the BOJ's forward guidance. Analysts noted the central bank appeared to balance short-term caution with a long-term warning of tighter policy. Governor Kazuo Ueda faces the challenge of reconciling a government reluctant to tighten further with bond markets already pricing in additional hikes, with the timing of the next move debated. Adding complexity, the BOJ reportedly intervened in currency markets hours before the rate decision, buying yen to support the currency which had fallen to 40-year lows against the dollar. Yen weakness stems from the wide U.S.-Japan interest rate gap, high fuel prices, and market skepticism about the pace of BOJ policy normalization. The yield on Japan's 10-year government bonds fell to 2.8%, indicating investor expectations for future monetary tightening.

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Bank of Japan Signals Interest Rate Hike Despite Keeping Them at 1%

cryptonews.ruHace 6 min(s)

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

This article argues that the SK H力士 2x Leveraged ETF (7709) is fundamentally a negative expected value (EV) product, rather than simply a "double SK H力士" investment. Its core issue stems from its daily rebalancing mechanism to maintain a 2x leverage target. After a price move, the fund must buy more after a rise or sell after a fall to readjust its leverage, creating a systematic pattern of buying high and selling low. This introduces a "delay loss": it always reacts to past price changes, missing potential gains from adjusting earlier during an uptrend and suffering greater losses from adjusting later during a downtrend. While more frequent intraday rebalancing would improve returns in strong, smooth trending markets by reinvesting profits or cutting losses sooner, it also dramatically increases volatility drag (frictional losses) during choppy, oscillating markets due to more frequent high-buy/low-sell trades. The author draws a parallel to an option seller who delta hedges (short gamma), which involves similar "buy high, sell low" dynamic hedging. However, unlike an option seller who receives upfront premium (IV and theta) as compensation for this risk, the leveraged ETF investor receives no such compensation. Instead, they bear all the path-dependent volatility decay, plus additional costs like swap/derivatives financing, management fees, and trading slippage. Thus, the product's return profile can be framed as: 2x directional return minus realized variance drag minus financing costs minus derivatives costs minus management fees minus transaction costs. For the investor to profit, SK H力士's price must not only rise significantly but do so in a strong, sustained, and smooth trend to overcome these inherent structural costs. High volatility and frequent price reversals are particularly damaging. The article also notes that while the ETF has no explicit liquidation line like perpetual futures, avoiding a sudden "blow-up," its net asset value can still decay towards zero over time through this combination of volatility drag and fees. For experienced traders, directly managing leverage via perpetual contracts may offer more control and potentially lower costs than this packaged, mechanistic product.

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

Why Are Leveraged ETFs like 7709 Inherently Negative EV Products?

marsbitHace 13 min(s)

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

The article discusses the growing debate over whether TradeXYZ, which dominates Hyperliquid's HIP-3 market with over 90% of its volume, might break away to build its own independent trading platform. This possibility is fueled by TradeXYZ's immense market influence and the common industry trend of successful projects seeking more control and profit capture. Key arguments for a potential split include TradeXYZ's overwhelming contribution to Hyperliquid's metrics and the financial incentive to retain all transaction fees, as it currently splits them 50/50 with Hyperliquid. The piece draws parallels to other cases, like Anthropic's "Claude Code" competing with its former partner Cursor, suggesting "betrayal" can occur when business leverage shifts. However, strong counterarguments suggest a split is unlikely or would be detrimental. TradeXYZ relies on Hyperliquid's high-performance infrastructure and its platform as a primary user acquisition channel. Building a comparable system would be challenging. Furthermore, the founders of both projects share a history of trust and mutual admiration. The analysis concludes that a separation would likely be a lose-lose scenario: Hyperliquid would lose a major growth narrative and trading volume, while TradeXYZ would face technical hurdles, user migration issues, and reputational damage, potentially allowing competitors to seize market share. The most rational path is seen as continued collaboration, with TradeXYZ potentially negotiating better terms while leveraging Hyperliquid's established strengths.

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

'Backstabbing' or 'Win-Win'? How Likely Is TradeXYZ to Break Away from Hyperliquid and Go Solo?

marsbitHace 22 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片